Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-24-2013, 06:55 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AndrzejM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840

Berta - '97 BMW 318 tds Compact
90 day: 62.03 mpg (US)

Charlie - '07 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso Exclusive
90 day: 37.58 mpg (US)

Corsa - '05 Opel Corsa C
90 day: 53.22 mpg (US)

Mruczek - '03 Audi A2
90 day: 60.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
I have deleted both A/C and P/S and I'm not missing that at all For sure engine is spinning much easier at idle so if you're coasting with engine on you'll gain some FE for sure.

I can't provide any numbers though because I haven't done any A-B-A tests.

__________________


Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-24-2013, 09:48 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 163

Camry - '99 Toyota Camry
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
You're right I will probably just leave it off lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2013, 09:51 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 163

Camry - '99 Toyota Camry
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrzejM View Post
I have deleted both A/C and P/S and I'm not missing that at all For sure engine is spinning much easier at idle so if you're coasting with engine on you'll gain some FE for sure.

I can't provide any numbers though because I haven't done any A-B-A tests.
Yeah I do quite a bit of neutral coasting
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2013, 05:46 PM   #14 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Since my power steering belt broke last summer I have noticed no real difference in mileage.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 06:59 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 163

Camry - '99 Toyota Camry
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
I have taken the belt off today we shall see what gain I see. I took it for a test drive at slow speeds it takes more effort to turn but not terrible at speed its fine. I did notice it coasted longer without the belt on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 01:59 AM   #16 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
I recently did a test where I spun the P/S pump up to different speeds using a power drill, optical tachometer and kill-a-watt meter.
The results were at 850 RPMs the P/S pump took almost no power to spin at that speed only detected about a 150 watt draw.
The posibility of gaining any MPG improvement form a P/S delete were looking to be slim to none.
But when I did the test at a more normal cruising speed of 2000RPMs the P/S power consumption jumped to about 500 watts.
For a small car that turns higher RPMs on the highway that should make at least a 1MPG difference.

With my suburban a 500 watt accessory reduction should make at least a half MPG difference.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
sully06 (07-03-2013)
Old 07-03-2013, 03:07 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 163

Camry - '99 Toyota Camry
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Yeah I don't expect to see high gains but I'm looking at the big picture my goal is to get to 40 mpg. One less accessory will increase coasting as well
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 10:50 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
justme1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: ff
Posts: 459
Thanks: 59
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
Blew the hose 2 years back. I couldnt find one so did a simple bypass to keep neutral hydraulics action and fluid inside the rack n pinion.
I did see a 1/2 mpg increase but project snow balled at this point and it would have required 3-4 tanks test to give you solid returns answer and that never happened.
The new more amperage toyota alternator and Largest battery I could fit were next added 2 weeks later.
This was a 1+ mpg mod also because Darkened morning drive kept running Alternator on constant .
Small Batteries are lighter but wont run headlamps for long till alternator starts constant on off cycles. "Good Mod" for night drivers.
Also larger pulley reduces voltage peak mine went from nearly 14.4vdc to 13.2under driving it.
I never looked back and cant say exactly how much had changed where, as said I went into modding it full force and fast.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to justme1969 For This Useful Post:
sully06 (07-03-2013)
Old 07-03-2013, 01:03 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 142

Cinco The Miata - '90 Mazda Miata
Team Mazda
Sports Cars
90 day: 36.13 mpg (US)

Oscar Wilde - '02 Honda Metropolitan
Motorcycle
90 day: 94.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
I deleted my power steering and air conditioning and felt like it made it made a noticeable improvement in my mileage.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 03:38 AM   #20 (permalink)
Exceptional Member
 
YukonCornelius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 166

Crapolier - '98 Chevrolet Cavalier base
90 day: 34.81 mpg (US)

05 CTS-V - '05 cadillac cts-v
90 day: 33.01 mpg (US)

95 Accord - '95 Honda Accord
90 day: 38.06 mpg (US)

11 CTS-V - '11 Cadillac CTS-V
Thanks: 27
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
I thought about doing this in my accord but in a fast acting swerve scenario I would regret that mod. I would hate to not be able to control my car properly to save a little gas.

__________________




Don't know why it says 00, it's a 95
374,000 miles and tired.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com