Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-15-2011, 03:02 PM   #21 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 36
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
I somewhat agree with Fat Charlie, but I am doing my best to overcome the inherent risk of driving a smaller car. How concerned are you guys about the risks of driving a smaller car?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-15-2011, 04:03 PM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoGogebic View Post
I somewhat agree with Fat Charlie, but I am doing my best to overcome the inherent risk of driving a smaller car. How concerned are you guys about the risks of driving a smaller car?
What risk? that you have less vehicle to hit or to hit other things? that small cars are less likely to roll over, that lighter cars stop faster and accelerate faster?
Trash cans and soup cans are both made out of steel that is pretty close to the same thickness, but what one is going to be easier to dent? the trash can is going to crumple while the soup can is hard to crush.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2011, 08:42 PM   #23 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
What's the inherent risk of driving a car that can get out of its own way? I'll take something nimble any day.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
GoGogebic (08-15-2011)
Old 08-15-2011, 09:22 PM   #24 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 36
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
The cockpit of my car is less then 32" wide so avoiding a direct frontal impact should definitely be easier then with my focus.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2011, 09:26 PM   #25 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Think more like it being a motorcycle... there is no crash protection at all there, and people still safely drive them. The difference is what you rely on for safety. With a car, most people mindlessly stay in their lane and when rely on airbags, crumple zones, etc to keep them safe when involved in a accident. Motorcyclists must be more aware of their surroundings and actively avoid dangers to stay safe. An alert motorcyclist can avoid the accident altogether.

That's another reason to lose a wheel... trikes are generally considered motorcycles and thus are allowed special exemptions in most (all?) states, such as being allowed to drive in HOV lanes. I would think a trike could handle snow equally well as compared to a 4-wheeled car with more weight per tire.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2011, 10:26 PM   #26 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 36
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Darcane,

You'll see earlier in the post I live in Wisconsin. I couldn't make it to the first stop light with 3 wheels. We get up to 12" of snow a day. The side streets take 1 day to get plowed good and salt doesn't work in below zero weather. A trike is definitely out of the question, but thanks for commenting.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2011, 01:52 PM   #27 (permalink)
imported Appalachian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 70

Yoda - '97 Toyota Corolla Base
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

She-Ra - '03 Honda Accord EX
90 day: 22.91 mpg (US)

Thor - '04 Toyota 4Runner SR5
90 day: 18.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Having a small car has enabled me to avoid so many accidents. My only concern with my car is how I would do in a side impact collision because of how light my doors are. Thick steel tubing in the doors would make me feel safer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2011, 02:51 PM   #28 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 194.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
You might be able to enhance side impact protection by connecting the front and read pods with a bar: (if you pardon the poor shop)

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	side_bar.jpg
Views:	194
Size:	55.2 KB
ID:	9340  
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
GoGogebic (08-21-2011)
Old 08-23-2011, 04:34 PM   #29 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoGogebic View Post
Darcane,

You'll see earlier in the post I live in Wisconsin. I couldn't make it to the first stop light with 3 wheels. We get up to 12" of snow a day. The side streets take 1 day to get plowed good and salt doesn't work in below zero weather. A trike is definitely out of the question, but thanks for commenting.
While I live in Washington now, I grew up and learned to drive in southcentral Alaska (I've driven in one town that averages 25ft of snow a year and can get nearly 4ft in 24hrs), so I've got a pretty strong understanding of how snow affects driving dynamics. I'm still missing how you will be negatively affected driving in it by losing one wheel with all other things remaining equal. With decent tires intended for snow, you will have plenty of traction for winter driving.

And, they are a little different than an on-the-road trike, but I've ridden 3-wheelers in snow and my brother used to ice-race on a dirt bike converted to a trike. I remember both having plenty of traction up front.

If you don't want a trike, so be it. It's your vehicle. I just don't see that a trike should be eliminated as an option solely due to winter performance.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2011, 04:42 PM   #30 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
He thinks the 3rd wheel would be "breaking trail" and that's a deal killer. Personally, I doubt it. I live in heavy snow country too and I wonder how bad that could be. I played with trike atvs in heavy snow too. I recall going through deep snow woods following my friend on his snowmobile; I did keep the front wheel in his track but still the snow was quite deep.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com