Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2013, 03:26 PM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,549
Thanks: 8,091
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
Quote:
Wheel base is 110in...
The driver in the car is...
The car is 42" tall..
the engine is...
So—done deal? Too late for major changes?

Quote:
The seat will move up 10 ins to help the driver get in. The canopy moves up and forward to let the driver in.
Your renderings don't show the cut-lines. What's the step-over height for entry/egress? Where are the hinges?

Quote:
it weights ~845lbs

the engine is a 250cc twin 6speed with a lsd, I'm working a turbo and a automated pulse and glide system.
Maybe 15 horsepower? 56.333 lb/horsepower? What's it's 1/4 mile time?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-12-2013, 04:35 PM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 830
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
I wonder why a twin? I would suspect a single is a fair bit more efficient. Is it a smoothness thing?

Last edited by pete c; 01-12-2013 at 04:56 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 06:35 PM   #53 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 36
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Actual it has 28 hp
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 06:41 PM   #54 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 36
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
1/4" time

Actually it has 28 hp. 1/4" mile in 19 secs. It the same 1/4" time as a 2001 prius. This is why I'm working on a turbo.

Quote:
So—done deal? Too late for major changes?
What changes do you want to see?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 07:43 PM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,549
Thanks: 8,091
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
Other than the front half of all four pontoons, the excessive headroom, the number of exposed suspension elements, the diameter of the drive half-shafts and lack of a slammable door—no changes just for my sake.

I just want to see a closeup picture of 'stack-of-nickels' welds on aluminum tubing. Or some power tools.

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 11:21 PM   #56 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
1/4" mile and 1/4" time = pretty dang small.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
HydroJim (01-14-2013)
Old 01-14-2013, 04:40 AM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AndrzejM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840

Berta - '97 BMW 318 tds Compact
90 day: 62.03 mpg (US)

Charlie - '07 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso Exclusive
90 day: 37.58 mpg (US)

Corsa - '05 Opel Corsa C
90 day: 53.22 mpg (US)

Mruczek - '03 Audi A2
90 day: 60.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoGogebic View Post
Yeah it seems like most cars aren't designed for colder weather. For example, why don't they make cars with electric assisted heating. The car would have a coil that turned on for a couple minutes until the engine was up to temperature to heat the car. People still warm up their car around here just because the heat doesn't really work until you have the engine on for 5-10 mins. Plus having a electric windshield defroster would be nice so you don't have to have the heat blasting and the cabin temperature at a 100 just to keep the windows from frosting up when it -5degrees.

Gogogebic
I like your project and I can't wait to see the fabrication stage.

Anyway regarding your post above, take a look here: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post338027 There are such cars
__________________


Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 07:20 AM   #58 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
HydroJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 625

Aerofocus (retired) - '00 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 44.66 mpg (US)

The Red Baron (sold) - '93 Geo Metro
90 day: 44.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 156 Times in 103 Posts
Reverse Trike - Spartan Trike Project

Ignore the fact that this link is to a trike. The main thing I'm pointing out is his design. the way the driver's legs go all the way to the front. it saves a lot of space.

And if you're wondering about his 1000 lb curb weight, that's only because he has to add ballast for California regulations. in reality, it weighs closer to 500-600 pounds.
__________________
Aerospace Controls Engineer.
Currently driving a mostly stock 2014 Mitsubishi Mirage DE hatchback.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 10:03 AM   #59 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 36
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
headroom

4-5" of headroom is hardly excessive. I have it set up so if you roll the thing your head won't be the thing hitting the ground. There's a rollbar in the front and back.

The whole thing about exposed the suspension and the wheeling fairing is being over dramatized. The frontal area of this car is about the same as a motorcycle. The car is much smaller then it looks like in these pictures.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 04:28 PM   #60 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,549
Thanks: 8,091
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
Quote:
4-5" of headroom is hardly excessive. I have it set up so if you roll the thing your head won't be the thing hitting the ground. There's a rollbar in the front and back.
Fair enough, maybe hats will come back.

Quote:
The whole thing about exposed the suspension and the wheeling fairing is being over dramatized.
Did you look at the design HydroJim posted? Construction being equal, those fenders would have less weight and better cross-wind aerodynamics. Even though his would work better aerodynamically if they were turned front-to-back.

The two-dimensional streamlining you use is comparable to the Tromphenwagen.

An ideal streamline shape would have a blunt nose and a convex taper in the rear, instead of the ogee curve you use (and you wouldn't lose that spare tire.


Why did you delete the enclosing fairing on the rear suspension from your intermediate design?


Last edited by freebeard; 01-14-2013 at 04:33 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com