Did big sugar have a "tobacco moment?"

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by All Darc

Natural sellection was poorly, not effective on reduce parksinson, alzeheimer and artheriosclerosis... All because the danger of primitive environment and need of strength to hunt, predator and infections, would kill people before these diseases arrive or get relevant.

Which is why it's important to begin the discussion of genetic engineering now. We'll all be blind and diabetic in the future if we don't engineer out disease and disability. Our only 2 options to fight genetic problems is to let nature take its course (don't treat disease), or engineer out the genes that give us problems. My preference would be to engineer out the problems starting with the ones most easily identified as being a serious health concern.

[All Darc]

Do you want chicken fried and bacon grease?

Come on along boys it's just down the road a piece :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nEL0feqkB8

;-)


Ok. If you want good genetics, try to combine the best of each thing.
John B. Goodenough DNA for a sharp mind even at 96 years old. Keith Richards DNA for resistance to toxic substances... What else, let's start a list of candidates for each strong charcteristic.

Many pretty blonde girls are already aware of this and they perform genetic sellection since many decades ago about husbands, for a characteristic about be good to deal with money and longevity, since many could marry a 82 years old milionaire.

Originally Posted by redpoint5

Which is why it's important to begin the discussion of genetic engineering now. We'll all be blind and diabetic in the future if we don't engineer out disease and disability. Our only 2 options to fight genetic problems is to let nature take its course (don't treat disease), or engineer out the genes that give us problems. My preference would be to engineer out the problems starting with the ones most easily identified as being a serious health concern.