Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-03-2012, 11:40 AM   #41 (permalink)
Definately a Modder!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 94
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
I am seriously thinking about hooking up a quick lashup to my N-18, and N-75 valves on my car. I'll use a couple wires, a couple of LEDs, and a couple resistors. It will be cool to see a visual representation of the duty cycle. I'm doing this in preparation for some future mods to my car in regards to charge pressure control, and EGR modifications.


Any updates on any progress on the MPG front with your EGR delete UFO?

__________________
2002 VW Jetta TDI 5-speed(completed 01M-5-speed swap at 155K miles) 45 MPG City with the 01M, 5-speed 60+ MPG City. Nokian Entyre Low RR Tires. Experimenting with the "Hybrid" 205 Deg F T-stat:

http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread...=306799&page=4

..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-03-2012, 11:58 AM   #42 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
I'm still just taking data, I'm on my second tank with EGR defeated. When I next fill up, I am going to re-enable it and see if I get a mileage change. At this point any difference may be within the margin of error given varied traffic and weather conditions.

I don't think you will get much visual indication of the N18 and N75 activity, the on-off behavior of those signals is in the 1-5 mS range, perhaps too fast for the eye to detect.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 03:07 PM   #43 (permalink)
Definately a Modder!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 94
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Poo, that stinks about the speed. Maybe the total LED brightness will change with varying PWM signal. I've never tried it, so I don't know.
__________________
2002 VW Jetta TDI 5-speed(completed 01M-5-speed swap at 155K miles) 45 MPG City with the 01M, 5-speed 60+ MPG City. Nokian Entyre Low RR Tires. Experimenting with the "Hybrid" 205 Deg F T-stat:

http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread...=306799&page=4

..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 03:34 PM   #44 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh8loop View Post
Poo, that stinks about the speed. Maybe the total LED brightness will change with varying PWM signal. I've never tried it, so I don't know.
The brightness will vary. If you can set the proper resistance, the difference between 1mA average current and 10mA average current is obvious on an LED.

Your typical LED drops 2V, so your resistor will see 12V when the solenoid is energized. Use a value of 1K ohms, and at 90% duty, you will have about 10mA average current, and 10% duty you will have about 1mA.

Install the resistor in series with the LED, and wire the series set across the terminals of the solenoid.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 07:06 PM   #45 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
So you are removing emissions equipment on your engine to get better mileage ?
That's terrible !

Saving a few dollars while causing more pollution is something large corporations do.

I would hate to see us stoop so low as to join them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 12:40 AM   #46 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
The large corporations designed emmissions equipment that give you cleaner exhaust but most of them just happen to require more fuel get burned.

EGR on a diesel that is used to reduce NOx (also reduces fuel milage) could be replaced with water injection and get better fuel milage.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 12:45 AM   #47 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
So you are removing emissions equipment on your engine to get better mileage ?
That's terrible !

Saving a few dollars while causing more pollution is something large corporations do.

I would hate to see us stoop so low as to join them.
NOx is a secondary pollutant, and requires reaction to hydrocarbons and UV light to actually be pollution. Reality is not as simple as you'd like it to be.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 10:49 AM   #48 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Another thing that's worth noting is the NOx is a local pollutant. By that I mean that any effect that is may have is going to be limited to the local area. I you don't live in an area that has NOx issues (primarily smog), you can make the argument that it's doing no significant harm.

On the other hand, removing the NOx emissions control device increases fuel efficiency and therefore reduces CO2 emissions. Unlike NOx emissions, CO2 emissions are of a concern on a global scale, not local.

So, the case can actually be made that you're helping emissions.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Diesel_Dave For This Useful Post:
Cd (02-04-2012)
Old 02-04-2012, 10:24 PM   #49 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
That is if you believe CO2 is as evil as every one says it is.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 10:59 PM   #50 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
That is if you believe CO2 is as evil as every one says it is.
Science is not a matter of belief.

__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com