Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: Do you think people would buy a diesel-powered 60s American Classic?
Yes, they'd be lining up to pay $8k or more 9 17.65%
Sure, there'd be a few people interested in paying $6k-8k 15 29.41%
Good luck, I'm sure someone would pay $4k-6k 10 19.61%
It's your dream, but you might be alone on this one 17 33.33%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-20-2012, 05:09 PM   #51 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,187

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
The cummins 5.9L engines weigh like 1100 pounds.

The old brick filter head and the lift pump are the main source of inward air leaks.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-21-2012, 11:34 PM   #52 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Instead of American classic cars I would target the people that cherish European classic cars like VWs, Opels, and BMWs. I would guess that they would be more amenable to the "what if " of modern diesel drivetrains in their cars.
Hmmm... I'm imagining a Mercedes 240d engine and manual tranny in a bmw 2002

I don't really think there's much point into swapping a diesel engine into those cars. They're so small and already get pretty good gas mileage. I don't see them being very desirable unless they're in fabulous shape and then why not leave them as-is? They are also much harder to find than the American cars.

I'm trying to fill a gap for folks who want a decent-sized vehicle that is fuel efficient and still somewhat interesting, in addition to being biofuel-compatible. Currently a Mercedes diesel is the only thing that fits that category.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012, 10:14 AM   #53 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
I thought the V8 was a 5.7 liter. A 4.3 would be a V6.
Nope, the V8 came in 3 varieties 4.3,4.8,5.7 all had head bolt issues.
The "6" came in 2 varieties, inline and V, the best motor GM ever made diesel wise was the inline 6 olds, it weighed almost as much as the 5.7, had more headbolts and was rock solid as diesel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 07:27 PM   #54 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ok, just want to clarify what people are saying with an example.

I buy an 80s 4x4 Suburban with a 6.2L, and say a 62 Corvair with a stock V8 and automatic tranny

I can swap the 6.2L diesel into the Corvair and it will work fine with the stock transmission (gearing)?

Can I then swap the V8 gasser into the Suburban and have two running vehicles at the end? (thus able to sell the Suburban and lowering my costs)

I'm obviously going to look more into the specific transmissions and such once I am ready to start buying and working on this project. Just trying to get some general info for now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 10:23 PM   #55 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
tortoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 71

number 9 - '89 Geo Metro LSi
90 day: 49.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacolocho View Post
I buy an 80s 4x4 Suburban with a 6.2L, and say a 62 Corvair with a stock V8 and automatic tranny.
Huh? Do you mean maybe a Chevelle, or a Corvette? Corvairs had rear mounted air-cooled flat sixes, ya know? On the other hand, Chevelles started in '63.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tortoise For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (01-29-2012)
Old 01-29-2012, 10:25 PM   #56 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
OK, poor choice. I actually know like zero about Corvairs. Sure, an Impala or Chevelle or even a Cadillac.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 02:15 AM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vacationtime247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Crescent City, CA
Posts: 284

The Toylet - '87 Toyota Supra 350 Chevy V8 / 700R4

In-Durrrr-Oh - '09 TMEC Enduro TMEC 200cc Enduro
90 day: 60.9 mpg (US)

Tem-poo - '86 Ford Tempo GL 4 Door 2.0 Liter Diesel 5 Speed
90 day: 47.52 mpg (US)

Ass Tick - '01 Pontiac Pontiac Aztek GT 5 Door

Green Baby Poop Stain - '01 Pontiac Aztek Aztek Base Model

Black Track - '01 Pontiac Aztek GT
Thanks: 14
Thanked 35 Times in 21 Posts
This statement bothers me because it's true. > = (
VT247

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
As far as classic car guys being interested in the "correct" engines, the midwest guys at least seem to want to stick a 350 Chevy into everything from a Radio Flyer wagon to a school bus.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 01:31 PM   #58 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacolocho View Post
Ok, just want to clarify what people are saying with an example.

I buy an 80s 4x4 Suburban with a 6.2L, and say a 62 Corvair with a stock V8 and automatic tranny

I can swap the 6.2L diesel into the Corvair and it will work fine with the stock transmission (gearing)?

Can I then swap the V8 gasser into the Suburban and have two running vehicles at the end? (thus able to sell the Suburban and lowering my costs)

I'm obviously going to look more into the specific transmissions and such once I am ready to start buying and working on this project. Just trying to get some general info for now.
Redline on a 6.2 in 4000rpm, best to stick at 3600rpm or lower. Depending on what exactly you are dealing with you may want a higher rearend differential (which is likely already on the suburban) not because of the redline but because of the excess fuel consumption migrating above 2800rpms.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 01:34 PM   #59 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Redline on a 6.2 in 4000rpm, best to stick at 3600rpm or lower. Depending on what exactly you are dealing with you may want a higher rearend differential (which is likely already on the suburban) not because of the redline but because of the excess fuel consumption migrating above 2800rpms.
You mean a higher differential in the [chevelle]? Can you be more specific please, I'm getting confused as to what you're referring to...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 09:14 PM   #60 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
My 82 suburban has a 2.8 geared rearend diff from a very old unnamed chevy car.

Many times (but not always) rearends are swappable from one chevy to another, even if they are 30 years apart with a small amount of effort (assuming they are the same size)

I was saying with a 6.2 you probably want a higher rearend than what would come in a typical 60's era car just because you would waste a lot of gas if your rpms are too high, it probably wouldn't hurt anything and you can even tune the 6.2 to deal with high RPMs fairly well but there is not point to have the gears needed for pulling stumps when the 6.2 in a car can get better fuel economy in the 1600-2200rpm range.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
larrybuck (11-26-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com