Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-08-2014, 12:48 AM   #21 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
If coasting is so dang efficient why don't manufacturers put it into automotive cruise controls . Have them de=clutch and coast for 5 seconds and restart. Is it beyond the capabilities of cars which use radar to cc.

__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-08-2014, 01:20 AM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
davelobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 170

CRX - '91 Honda CRX HF
Last 3: 63.1 mpg (US)

the ugly one - '97 saturn SL just sl,not sl1 or 2
Team Saturn
90 day: 44.15 mpg (US)

Vibe - '07 Pontiac Vibe
Team Pontiac
90 day: 44.24 mpg (US)

Hoopdie - '05 Toyota Corolla CE
90 day: 42.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 38 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn View Post
If coasting is so dang efficient why don't manufacturers put it into automotive cruise controls . Have them de=clutch and coast for 5 seconds and restart. Is it beyond the capabilities of cars which use radar to cc.
They won't touch that with a ten foot pole. Have the car automatically speed up and slow down would be a lawsuit waiting to happen. The manufacturers are getting real serious real fast however because of the outlandish café standards. They are covering grills with shutters, making smooth under-bellies, using auto shut-off at stops, shutting down cylinders under light loads, etc. These are all out there and being used already. I have a hunch they may learn a little from sites like this.
__________________
Get bored very quickly. Vibe, Saturn, and crv all long gone. Been a while but I'm back in the game, gunna see what I can do with this Corolla.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 01:23 AM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
The Prius coasts with the engine off and no drive to the wheels.

-

The problem with automated EOC is predicting when the customer will want or need power back. An experienced EOCer knows how to get around that. Your common driver will not enjoy the feeling of having to wait for power to come back... however short the wait is (the Prius gets a free pass because you get electric assist before the engine comes back on).
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 01:27 AM   #24 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
For the same reason they spec lower than optimal air pressure- to avoid customer complaints about a harsh ride. If a car eoc'd by itself people would freak.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 01:36 AM   #25 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
davelobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 170

CRX - '91 Honda CRX HF
Last 3: 63.1 mpg (US)

the ugly one - '97 saturn SL just sl,not sl1 or 2
Team Saturn
90 day: 44.15 mpg (US)

Vibe - '07 Pontiac Vibe
Team Pontiac
90 day: 44.24 mpg (US)

Hoopdie - '05 Toyota Corolla CE
90 day: 42.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 38 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
For the same reason they spec lower than optimal air pressure- to avoid customer complaints about a harsh ride.
he he, they would have loved my 55 psi tires in my weightless CRX. Rattled fillings loose on our wonderful Michigan roads.
__________________
Get bored very quickly. Vibe, Saturn, and crv all long gone. Been a while but I'm back in the game, gunna see what I can do with this Corolla.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 08:31 AM   #26 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
I agree it is dangerous to others in traffic for you or your car to do random speed changes. Although good for fuel mileage is not without trouble.

It was mentioned in another thread about the increased air polution relavent to engine starts and restarts. Imagine everyone adding to poorer air quality.

I am going off topic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davelobi View Post
They won't touch that with a ten foot pole. Have the car automatically speed up and slow down would be a lawsuit waiting to happen. The manufacturers are getting real serious real fast however because of the outlandish café standards. They are covering grills with shutters, making smooth under-bellies, using auto shut-off at stops, shutting down cylinders under light loads, etc. These are all out there and being used already. I have a hunch they may learn a little from sites like this.
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 08:53 AM   #27 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Indiana, US
Posts: 133

TheCav - '04 Chevy Cavalier LS
Thanks: 13
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
I want to throw in my experience. I attempted EoC in my chevy cavalier for about a few days. Two times my knock sensor went off. I have not attempted to EoC again. Not sure why this happened Can anyone help to explain that to me?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 10:26 PM   #28 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
During or after?

-

Pollution caused by restarts is because of fuel wasted trying to get the engine spinning. Starter motors typically aren't powerful enough to start the engine wiithout some assistance from the combustion itself. So, with most motors, the fuel maps are run extra rich at start-up and when cranking.

Mazda minimizes this by priming a cylinder with fuel for the restart under iStop. But it still requires fuel to start the engine.

You don't have this problem with a bump-start. The motive force for the engine comes from the tires, not the starter or the motor itself... and that's more than enough.

Bump-start: No fuel enrichment mode. Just a seamless move between engine off and engine on...
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (07-08-2014)
Old 07-09-2014, 04:26 AM   #29 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
There's another problem with the restarts, which is that running the engine at low duty cycle means the cats will cool off considerably.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 10:56 AM   #30 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
I bump start the Focus on occasion to save the starter motor if I am parked facing downhill.

At my last job, where I would travel for work, I used to do it quite frequently. My office was on somewhat of a hill. I could coast out of the parking lot and for a few city blocks before bump starting the car.

It's bad on the motor mounts. There is a broken motor mount on the Focus. But I blame that on all of the city miles and the car having a bad motor mount.

Noticed that I can't do it in 2nd gear (or first). The car just stops.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com