Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-20-2009, 11:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,543

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 63.95 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,301
Thanked 597 Times in 386 Posts
Thanks for both your posts.

I'm trying to get this done this weekend (I only get one weekend off every month)so all the advice is very much appreciated.

I just measured the bottom angle up and it came out to be 28 degrees.

If I make the top around 15 degrees the bottom will be close to 15 degrees also. Is this a better way to go then then 11 degrees top with 28 degrees bottom?

__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-20-2009, 11:55 PM   #12 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Bottom has minimal airflow, I'd worry more about keeping the top attached. 15* may do it for you, though.

Best to set up a test bed type of mod, that you can tweak and test, rather than going all out on the first iteration, just for this type of question.

I do think that 28* on the bottom is way too steep to even think that airflow will stay attached, so it might be OK to break cleanly, rather than try to keep attached flow. I assume the front will have a lowered stagnation point, so there will be less than normal airflow under the car as well, correct?
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 01:32 AM   #13 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,543

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 63.95 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,301
Thanked 597 Times in 386 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Bottom has minimal airflow, I'd worry more about keeping the top attached. 15* may do it for you, though.

Best to set up a test bed type of mod, that you can tweak and test, rather than going all out on the first iteration, just for this type of question.

I do think that 28* on the bottom is way too steep to even think that airflow will stay attached, so it might be OK to break cleanly, rather than try to keep attached flow. I assume the front will have a lowered stagnation point, so there will be less than normal airflow under the car as well, correct?
Yes the front bumper is only 4" off the ground. Plus I'm adding even more front lip so it will sit around 1" off the ground. The side skirts will be around
1" also.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line


Last edited by pgfpro; 11-24-2009 at 04:10 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 01:42 AM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 460 Times in 328 Posts
"Yes the front bumper is only 4" off the ground. Plus I'm adding even more front lip so it will sit around 1" off the ground. The side skirts will be around 1" also."

That sounds like a maximum downforce setup. I suppose it might be useful on ice, but it will probably raise rolling resistance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 02:13 AM   #15 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
"Yes the front bumper is only 4" off the ground. Plus I'm adding even more front lip so it will sit around 1" off the ground. The side skirts will be around 1" also."

That sounds like a maximum downforce setup. I suppose it might be useful on ice, but it will probably raise rolling resistance.
That would be a nail-biter setup around here... I've seen guys with 3-4" of clearance trash their bottoms out here, and I rode around with about 2" for awhile, but I decided it was just too hard to negotiate every pebble in the road at the correct angle and raised the 'Scort back up.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 12:12 PM   #16 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,543

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 63.95 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,301
Thanked 597 Times in 386 Posts
OK I think I will leave the bottom clearance at 4".

I thought that the idea was to keep as little air from going under the car. I was wrong this aero stuff is killing me.LOL

The only time I will need down-force would be at the track and the hill climb.

For the most part it will be used for hopefully 1000 mile road trips across the great western United States. I will be mostly on the Interstate Freeway system but you never know when I have to stop to get food etc. what the roads will be like.

So today I will see what a 15 degree drop roof angle will get me for the bottom rear piece.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 09:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Check out the nose of vetter's streamlined bikes - it's curved at the nose to allow some air to still get under the vehicle. Not much, but you need enough flow to fill the space between the car and the road, else you get the same effect as the wake behind the vehicle, which will create downforce by means of a vacuum under the car as the air rushes over and around the vehicle, but not under it to equalize the negative pressure.

No matter what you end up doing, make sure it can be changed without too much frustration, because after you test it, you may reveal a weak point in your design, such as a portion with detached flow or a turbulent vortex.

Hey, you never know.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 12:13 PM   #18 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,543

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 63.95 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,301
Thanked 597 Times in 386 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Check out the nose of vetter's streamlined bikes - it's curved at the nose to allow some air to still get under the vehicle. Not much, but you need enough flow to fill the space between the car and the road, else you get the same effect as the wake behind the vehicle, which will create downforce by means of a vacuum under the car as the air rushes over and around the vehicle, but not under it to equalize the negative pressure.

No matter what you end up doing, make sure it can be changed without too much frustration, because after you test it, you may reveal a weak point in your design, such as a portion with detached flow or a turbulent vortex.

Hey, you never know.


Quote:
Check out the nose of vetter's streamlined bikes
I just looked at his bikes. I think I'll raise it to 5" and start there.

I wish I could do some testing with my setup, but now may engine is apart so I can't drive it. But I should have it back running in about a month.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 12:15 PM   #19 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
You promised inside the engine pics! Let's have 'em!
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 09:27 PM   #20 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,543

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 63.95 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,301
Thanked 597 Times in 386 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
You promised inside the engine pics! Let's have 'em!
I will have a ton of pics at a later date with a thorough write up on my engine design.

__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project: 3D Driving Model noeryan General Efficiency Discussion 51 04-01-2012 11:38 AM
11 mpg to 15 mpg is it possible mostly on driving style and small mods? strider3700 Introductions 48 05-09-2010 03:08 AM
New York Auto Show: VW Golf Wins World Car of the Year Award SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 1 12-18-2009 05:46 AM
"Hypermiler" pulled over for driving too slow SVOboy Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 100 11-03-2009 12:11 AM
Car ads depicting "unsafe" driving banned in Canada MetroMPG The Lounge 15 10-30-2009 06:48 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com