Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-16-2019, 10:54 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 802
Thanks: 31
Thanked 192 Times in 161 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post


It looks like all the air sees is high-efficiency airfoils and propellers sucking any detached airflow for lunch.
Hunh? Not sure what you mean here.

__________________
2000 F250 7.3 CC 20+ MPG @ 10000 #
2013 Golf tdi 47.5 mpg neutered, 1500 mi beer run
1988 Ranger EV Volt batts>> 18,000 MPG and climbing. Rag overhaul.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-16-2019, 11:43 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 14,112
Thanks: 3,472
Thanked 4,639 Times in 3,698 Posts
I'm not sure either.

There're three prop circles that leave the mid-span of the wings and the tips of the tail exposed to free air. The fuselage and engine nacelles should have laminar flow, but any attached turbulence (interference drag at the root of the tail in crosswinds?) is actively managed by the propulsion system.

Maybe there is no advantage.
__________________
.
God's blessing on this wonderful world!
_________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2019, 12:40 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 802
Thanks: 31
Thanked 192 Times in 161 Posts
Not to disagree, but most everything in front of the props should be pretty much laminar unless it is a huge profile change.

I can see some turbulence at intersections and with the tip setup from vortice flow, and I wonder about the drive units operating in disturbed air but that will just reduce available thrust and not decrease drag.

I defer to your knowledge base as mine is mostly deduced from my aviation failures.
__________________
2000 F250 7.3 CC 20+ MPG @ 10000 #
2013 Golf tdi 47.5 mpg neutered, 1500 mi beer run
1988 Ranger EV Volt batts>> 18,000 MPG and climbing. Rag overhaul.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2019, 01:28 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,709

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,158
Thanked 2,735 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
And more complicated control linkages.
The Alice is fly by wire, so the blending is done by the computer, and servos do the work?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2019, 01:41 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Newb
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,703

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 28.07 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,194
Thanked 2,546 Times in 1,881 Posts
What I've always wanted to see is at least 1 electric motor driving the wheels. Rather than needing a pushback, just use the electric wheel to taxi, and only spool up the engines at takeoff (or however long is needed to warm up before takeoff). Perhaps the extra weight isn't justified when there's plenty of infrastructure in place for a pushback, though that whole process takes a couple minutes.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
freebeard (07-16-2019)
Old 07-16-2019, 01:54 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 14,112
Thanks: 3,472
Thanked 4,639 Times in 3,698 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
I defer to your knowledge base as mine is mostly deduced from my aviation failures.
Ha! Mine is from lurking on Ecomodder.
__________________
.
God's blessing on this wonderful world!
_________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2019, 02:22 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Newb
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,703

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 28.07 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,194
Thanked 2,546 Times in 1,881 Posts
Maybe it was the 100% fly by wire that made me think of this, but I just listened to "Bit flip" on Radiolab. Apparently the Toyota stuck accelerator issue was due to random bit flipping caused by cosmic radiation. At least that failure mode could be reproduced by simulating/inducing a bit flip in the speed control program. Now the system has redundancy to prevent such a problem (or make it statistically extraordinarily unlikely).

I'm sure an aircraft would have this redundancy built in, but with so much software, there's bound to be weaknesses in the code/redundancy/contingency.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2019, 02:50 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 802
Thanks: 31
Thanked 192 Times in 161 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
The Alice is fly by wire, so the blending is done by the computer, and servos do the work?
Afaik, Everything certified so far is redundant mechanical backup of some sort. Hydraulic mechanical actuation of surfaces. Im not sure the FAA is ready for full fly by wire with a multiple "souls" on board. A multi-million $$ fighter with nukes, they are ok with, as long as it has an ejection seat.
__________________
2000 F250 7.3 CC 20+ MPG @ 10000 #
2013 Golf tdi 47.5 mpg neutered, 1500 mi beer run
1988 Ranger EV Volt batts>> 18,000 MPG and climbing. Rag overhaul.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2019, 03:10 PM   #19 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 855

Go Pod - '00 Honda Insight AC

The Tinyvan - '07 Honda Fit Sport

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth
Thanks: 423
Thanked 438 Times in 285 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
What I've always wanted to see is at least 1 electric motor driving the wheels. Rather than needing a pushback, just use the electric wheel to taxi, and only spool up the engines at takeoff (or however long is needed to warm up before takeoff). Perhaps the extra weight isn't justified when there's plenty of infrastructure in place for a pushback, though that whole process takes a couple minutes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EGTS
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to samwichse For This Useful Post:
freebeard (07-16-2019)
Old 07-16-2019, 05:15 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 14,112
Thanks: 3,472
Thanked 4,639 Times in 3,698 Posts
Quote:
The main landing gear is equipped with an electric motor powered by the auxiliary power unit which allows the aircraft to push back from the gate and taxi without a tug or its jet engines.[1]

The system weighs 300 kilograms (660 lb) and is permanently installed on the aircraft.
So, the weight of 2-3 passengers.
_______________

Quote:
Originally Posted by DDG
What does 'triple redundant closed-loop digital avionics ...
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...cs-system-mean
The primary flight system comprises six computers, three sets of two computers each (triple redundancy X dual redundancy). This, along with massive verification and validation (V&V) was enough to satisfy NASA that the Dragon achieves the two fail safe requirement.

__________________
.
God's blessing on this wonderful world!
_________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com