Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-11-2012, 04:29 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
Cd vs Velocity

Quote:
Originally Posted by examorph View Post
Hello, I am back, this project has not been started yet and I have been very busy lately so have had no time to do much extra work on it but now I finally have a bit more time to spend thinking about how I should design the car.
I have modelled the car and have ran some wind tunnel tests on it and got some results but dont really know how to read them....the wind tunnel test results show me the drag coeficient (what I wanted) but this is on a graph over time, as time pass's the drag coeficient changes, the velocity of the air going over the vehicle also changes, this is strange because I set the value for the air speed and it should be constant, so I dont understand why the drag coeficient and air speeds are changing, any ideas?

The graph I see is the exact same graph as the one shown at the bottom of this picture:

http://gfxspeak.com/wp-content/uploa...6541711650.jpg

and here is the 2d slice air flow image I see constantly changing with time:

http://gfxspeak.com/wp-content/uploa...6541170698.jpg

Please note, these images were from google and are not of the car I have designed, I will get some images of that soon.
For vehicles the size of an automobile,their length as associated with velocity renders a transition to turbulent boundary layer at around 20-mph (32 km/h).The air around a road vehicle is considered turbulent itself and Reynolds number acts accordingly.
For this reason,coefficients of aerodynamic drag are constant above 20 mph and do not vary.So I'm as confused as you are about some of the results you are getting.
CFD modelling for 3-Dimensional flow requires the complete Navier-Stokes solution which may not be included in your software package.Not long ago,it would require supercomputers to solve these 3-D 'problems.'

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-12-2012, 06:37 AM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you for the reply, I spent some more time playing around with the software and found that I was wrong, the speed the vehicle is going is not constant, it is accelerating or slowing down from its previous speed in real time meaning it takes time for the speed to become the one you tell it.

Now that I have a drag coefficient I am again confused, I am getting low numbers for the car I have modelled and similar ones I modelled in the past, the drag coefficients are ranging from 0.5-0.7, from comparing them to real size vehicles these are very very small numbers but it's understandable because the vehicle size is also a lot smaller, the size of the vehicle is only about 1.5m length x 0.8m width and 0.5m high.

The two questions I have are, do you think these drag coefficients are correct for the vehicle size given and if they are correct wouldn't that mean that the drag coefficient of this vehicle is so low that the motor running it will not be able to get to the speeds required for air resistance to slow the vehicle down allot. If this is also true then wouldn't that mean that I shouldn't really have to worry about aerodynamics and my main goal should be making the vehicle as light as possible?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 12:19 AM   #23 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Coefficients by definition don't consider size.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 12:57 PM   #24 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am confused now, because I thought that the larger the vehicle the larger the drag therefore the larger the coefficient?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 01:02 PM   #25 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Drag increases with size because the frontal area increases. Total drag = Cd * A (projected / frontal area).

The coefficient of drag is the same for two identical shapes regardless of whether one is larger than the other.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 01:07 PM   #26 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So is a change of about 0.1-0.3 in the coefficient of drag a big change?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 01:09 PM   #27 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Define "big".

(Yes, that probably qualifies as big.)

You can view the impact of changes by comparing results from the aero & rolling drag calculator
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 03:45 PM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thank you for the calculator, very helpful

New question , I asked this before but after researching more I ask again, what shape should I make the car? I ask this again because I made a tear drop shape for a body around the car and tested it in the wind tunnel, the drag coefficient was about 0.5, I read on other websites that it is possible to achieve CD's of as low as 0.07! so I think I could probably do a little better than 0.5 if I change the shape, I saw images of some of the lowest CD vehicles, here is one that looked interesting:

http://www.actiflow.com/images/nuna5.jpg
http://www.techniche-europe.com/files/Nuna5_Car.jpg

What do you guys think of this? do you think I should spend my time modelling it and trying it in the wind tunnel or do you think there are better designs?

Also the car has to have 4 wheels which may cause problems with this design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 06:19 PM   #29 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by examorph View Post
thank you for the calculator, very helpful

New question , I asked this before but after researching more I ask again, what shape should I make the car? I ask this again because I made a tear drop shape for a body around the car and tested it in the wind tunnel, the drag coefficient was about 0.5, I read on other websites that it is possible to achieve CD's of as low as 0.07! so I think I could probably do a little better than 0.5 if I change the shape, I saw images of some of the lowest CD vehicles, here is one that looked interesting:

http://www.actiflow.com/images/nuna5.jpg
http://www.techniche-europe.com/files/Nuna5_Car.jpg

What do you guys think of this? do you think I should spend my time modelling it and trying it in the wind tunnel or do you think there are better designs?

Also the car has to have 4 wheels which may cause problems with this design.
I believe that the NUNA cars are at the low end of the drag spectrum.I think they are all 3-wheelers though.
In 1996,the Honda Dream-2 solar car team published a paper for the Japanese Society of Automotive Engineers about some research they did.It was all CFD as they ran out of time before they could put their 'car' in the tunnel.
Anyway,their Cd 0.10, 3-wheel Dream-2 was modified to 4-wheels and I think they were able to maintain around Cd 0.10.
You might check out this paper.Cd 0.10 is pretty good.They show front and side elevation views as well as the plan view.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 01:23 PM   #30 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wow thank you for the great paper!

Now that I am looking at cars such as the NUNA and Honda dream 2 I am starting to wonder, is the large surface area needed if the car is not using solar panel's, would reducing this area give an even lower CD? I ask because although the car I am designing is ran from an electric motor, solar panels or any additional power supply to the car battery is not allowed.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com