Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2010, 04:55 PM   #11 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
...In order to use E85, the ECU should be able to compensate for it, and the valves / valveseals should be hardened to withstand the higher burning temperatures and lack of lubing - you basically get the same valve-issues as with LPG...
The average EFI car can run upto 50% Ethanol before getting a CEL(Check Engine Light) from an out of spec condition depending on how much range the ECU is given. EFI can compensate for the differences in fueling in most driving since it usually fuels by Oxygen/Lamda Sensor which reads Stoich as 1.0 regardless of the fuel.

Gasoline engines have been using hardened valveseals since the 60's shortly after lead was banned in all pump Gasoline. Lead actually provided the lubrication for valve seals/stems, from my understanding, so hardened valve seals needed to be adopted to keep cars running without it.

If there is any merit to a concern about lubrication I haven't heard of any facts. Considering 2 stroke engines ran reliably with a mixture of 50:1 Gasoline:Oil and 2% of E98 is always an Oil based denaturant and is mixed with at least 15% Gasoline in E85 there doesn't seem to be any lack of Oil for lubrication with E85.

An another note if you noticed only 4 MPG difference from 37 MPG then it was probably your mods and driving changes more than anything else. E85 cannot affect your MPG if you aren't filling up with it .

__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-03-2010, 05:21 PM   #12 (permalink)
Work In Progress
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mt Vernon, WA
Posts: 135

Black Knight - '08 Toyota Yaris
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to honestabe
E85 is more like a race gas. I'd use it in my Supra if I were wanting to really make some power without having to spend $10-20/gallon. If you use E85, you will need to increase your fuel system's ability. To use E85 you need to increase your fuel flow rate by 20%, meaning you get much worse MPG than with regular gas.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 06:16 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
NHRABill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 191

Tahoe - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LT
90 day: 13.22 mpg (US)

SRX - '04 Cadillac SRX AWD

XL - '05 Harley Davidson Sportster XL
90 day: 49.97 mpg (US)

Alero - '02 Oldsmobile Alero GLS

Corvette - '75 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
I have not seen an E85 in the entire state where I live and only a few times in travels to other areas. The only concern I have ever heard regarding E85 is that it dries the gaskets and causes them to leak.

That was more concern from a friend that is a mechanic and responsible for ambulances in Indiana they converted a few over and we were talking about beneits from cork to pressed paper or liquid gaskets not knowing anything about E85 I was surprised by his findings I guess newer vehicles equipped to handle the fuel have the proper gaskets to resist such issues as he was having. All stations selling normal fuel are badged with 10% ethanol labels for at least 4 years now
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Traverse *active*
2002 Oldsmobile Alero GLS *active*
2002 S10 2wd p/u 139,000mi. *active*
1975 Corvette Stingray *active*
1994 Camaro Z28 Convertible 149k *Sold 2013*
1998 Blazer ZR2 189k *Sold 2012*
1995 Tahoe LT 250k *Sold 2011*

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 08:33 PM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by honestabe View Post
E85 is more like a race gas. I'd use it in my Supra if I were wanting to really make some power without having to spend $10-20/gallon. If you use E85, you will need to increase your fuel system's ability. To use E85 you need to increase your fuel flow rate by 20%, meaning you get much worse MPG than with regular gas.
^not
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
shovel (04-05-2013)
Old 12-05-2010, 01:12 AM   #15 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by honestabe View Post
E85 is more like a race gas. I'd use it in my Supra if I were wanting to really make some power without having to spend $10-20/gallon. If you use E85, you will need to increase your fuel system's ability. To use E85 you need to increase your fuel flow rate by 20%, meaning you get much worse MPG than with regular gas.
Increasing the flow rate by %%% does not mean the MPG goes down %%%. Driving style mixed with the tune determine the final MPG. If you leaned out the tune at cruising RPM you could get better MPG but couldn't you do the same for RG Gasoline too?

Due to hanging out on Honda-tech where quite a few E85 tuning discussion goes on, I know the number is not flat across the board. One particular tuner, who's name I have forgotten, noticed that E85 on one particular engine only needed 10% or so more fuel in the low RPM vs closer to 50% for high RPM WOT. Setting it to +33%(IE) across the board ruined performance or so I recall from memory. The numbers are not exact, but you should get the idea, the amount of fuel needed depends on many variables and needs to be tuned accordingly. Each engine is different and E85 has several grades.

So please don't go throwing around numbers like that. eg saying E85 needs this much more fuel etc. The amoun of fuel is very dependent on the engine, weather, and % of Ethanol. Not to mention how the tuner decides to go, they might lean it out during cruise, put everything to stoich for a DD, or even enrichen the mixture to add more power. I've seen far too many throw numbers anywhere from 20% to 2x the fuel, all of it is bogus. Anyone who claims to know the number and to know it all for a fact is a fool. There could be a range but even that is guess work. The number people are often referring to is the difference between "pure Gasoline's" Stoichiometry and Ethanol's which is approx 42% more fuel for Ethanol over the old "pure Gasoline" w/o ethanol. But every engine is different and the number would almost never be 42%.

This is Ecomodder, more facts less feces.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Allch Chcar For This Useful Post:
Boreas (12-05-2010)
Old 12-05-2010, 09:49 AM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
The average EFI car can run upto 50% Ethanol before getting a CEL(Check Engine Light) from an out of spec condition depending on how much range the ECU is given.
It will compensate to some extent, but that doesn't necessarily mean it'll run most efficiently while compensating for the ethanol in the fuel.

Quote:
Gasoline engines have been using hardened valveseals since the 60's shortly after lead was banned in all pump Gasoline.
Obviously not always enough to be running E85 or LPG.
While some engines are perfectly happy to run on LPG or ethanol, that certainly doesn't apply to all engines.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 11:29 AM   #17 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
It's instructive to look at the EPA ratings for flex-fuel vehicles. They have ratings for both gas and E85. The e85 ratings are on average 30% lower than the gas ratings.

__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Restore oil additive... suspectnumber961 The Unicorn Corral 46 11-20-2018 01:15 AM
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 158 01-12-2013 12:59 PM
I want to get to the bottom of this ethanol killing my mpg Nerys General Efficiency Discussion 175 08-16-2012 09:32 AM
Tips needed for eco-driving my diesel truck! nubbzcummins Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 65 12-07-2010 02:37 PM
Honda is developing a variable compression automobile engine: MPG up 7.4% MetroMPG EcoModding Central 22 04-23-2009 11:59 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com