Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-13-2013, 09:56 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yostumpy View Post
Yes I want to interupt the boost hose to the FIP, so that it can be 'partially ' restricted, in a similar way to the VW 'umwelt' eco engine IIRC. but then be opened up to give me max power when needed.
IIRC, the "umwelt version of the AAZ had NO boost pin, as the turbo was essentially just used to make sure there was sufficient air for a total clean burn. The turbo offered no performance (HP/Torque) gains

__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-13-2013, 10:11 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
yostumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: gravesend, uk
Posts: 47

wallace - '98 landrover 300tdi defender 110 hard top
90 day: 24.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
sounds about what I'm thinking of, leave turbo on, restrict boost hose to FIP, so turbo makes more air for more effient lean burn. how much better was the unwelt over std turbo deisel, for milage. Question is will my plan give me any gains, or make it worse.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 10:44 AM   #13 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb View Post
All the turbocharger does is increase the amount of air entering the combustion chamber. Either the computer, by keeping the injector open longer, or some other mechanism, adds fuel to match the extra air. Stopping the additional fuel altogether, with no other compensating changes, could cause you to run dangerously lean.
That is wrong. Diesels ALWAYS run lean - because diesel fuel is designed to be ignited by the heat of compression and burns slowly regardless of fuel/air mixtures, this allows them to burn fuel completely and with greater expansion, resulting in better fuel efficiency.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 02:07 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
yostumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: gravesend, uk
Posts: 47

wallace - '98 landrover 300tdi defender 110 hard top
90 day: 24.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ok ! bit of an update. As today was nice, it did a bit of tinkering and washed the truck, then i noticed the leak off pipes were not looking too good, so replaced them with something that I had lying around, then I thought that looks the same size pipe as the boost pipe. So I nipped round the other side, and whipped off the boost pipe from the turbo, and plugged it with a screw, then pushed a small length of pipe on the turbo outlet and plugged that one too. Started it up. and it ran. So I took it for a spin. Well I have to say i was VERY surprised indeed. Folks had said it would be pants, wouldn't pull over 50mph etc etc, but I wasn't convinced by the doom and gloom merchants, ( I never am).
So what was it like then? well as I said I was surprised. As I pulled away initially i waited until the road was completely clear just in case it was really slow as predicted. BUT it wasn't, moving off isn't much different really, obviously its less powerful, but it is MUCH more powerful than a 12J n/a, prob on a par with a 19j TD. it seems happy to rev freely, seems more fun to drive, dare I say it, (round country lanes anyway). I took it out on the dual carriage way, and it pulled a desired 60mph up a long ( 1 1/2mile) incline. I decided to accelerate and although much slower, it DID pick up well. Then on the return, on the flat, I planted my foot, and (again obviously not as quick) it accelerated from 56- 75 with ease and prob would have gone over 80 with ease had I not had to turn off. So It is VERY drivable but the funny thing I noticed (as I drove with one eye in the side mirror) there was ABSOLUTELY no smoke whatsoever.

So To recap I've blanked off the turbo boost pipe, so I still have a fully functioning turbo but without the extra fuelling on boost.
The BIG question is MPG. Will it be a gain, a loss, or same as. If it is a reasonable gain (10% would be nice) then I'll plumb in some copper micro bore pipe and a small gas tap fitted in line, in the cab, so when up a long hill, or loaded I'll turn on the 'gas'. It really does go very well indeed.! Can't wait ti fill up after a couple of hundred miles ( always fill up twixt 200-250)
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 02:21 PM   #15 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,525 Times in 2,799 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yostumpy View Post
Now would this work, I mean the turbo boost on without the xtra fuel, would it give ANY xtra power, over 'no turbo' and would it cause it to run lean.
Yes had my diesel set up to run N/A. Then I added a turbocharger. Now I have the turbos boost and quite a bit of extra power with adding any extra fuel.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 04:02 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
yostumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: gravesend, uk
Posts: 47

wallace - '98 landrover 300tdi defender 110 hard top
90 day: 24.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Yes had my diesel set up to run N/A. Then I added a turbocharger. Now I have the turbos boost and quite a bit of extra power with adding any extra fuel.

Did you gain any milage adding the turbo without the xtra boost?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 04:13 PM   #17 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,525 Times in 2,799 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yostumpy View Post
Did you gain any milage adding the turbo without the xtra boost?
I picked up little over 2mpg on my daily drive and looks like I picked up at least 3mpg on pure highway driving.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 01:37 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 69

Black sheep 2013 - '11 Volkswagen Jetta S
90 day: 29.01 mpg (US)

black sheep 2014 - '11 volkswagen jetta trendline plus
90 day: 29.78 mpg (US)

Black sheep 2015 - '11 Vw Jetta mk6
90 day: 22.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
interesting
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 03:12 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
yostumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: gravesend, uk
Posts: 47

wallace - '98 landrover 300tdi defender 110 hard top
90 day: 24.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I picked up little over 2mpg on my daily drive and looks like I picked up at least 3mpg on pure highway driving.
Thats a good gain. IIRC about a 9% gain on daily. If I could get 10% THAT'D put me in 32-33mpg (uk) daily and prob 37-38 on a run, (best is 35.4 at the mo) My goal ( the HOLY GRAIL) is 40mpg on a run!!

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com