09-27-2008, 11:20 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 26
TDI Cup - '10 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Cup Street 90 day: 50.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Effect of surface temperature on attached flow
I have been wondering the last few days and so far I have been unsuccessful in finding any real information on whether or not an increase in surface temperature has a postive impact on attached flow.
For example, could it matter what color your car is? If your car is black and you live in a sunny climate, will the increased surface temperature of the car help reduce viscosity of the airflow over the car thus reducing drag? I realize at highway speed the cooling effect of the air over the surface will neutralize any solar heating, however in city driving could this make a difference?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-28-2008, 09:04 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
I haven't seen any "real" info on the topic, but I doubt there's any significant effect of the temp of the vehicle's surface on airflow simply because the passing air isn't in the vicinity long enough to change temperature.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-28-2008, 09:14 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 76
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I don't think the car's surface would affect it, but the local air temp would slightly vary the density of air which makes it harder/easier for the car to push through the air.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mattW For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2008, 06:45 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
effect
I don't know of any investigation ever performed.I don't think it's an oversight.In the city,where it might have an effect,the speeds would be so slow as to lose any benefit.----------------- And as already mentioned,at higher speeds,the residence time of the air over the car is so brief,as to render the effect null.---------------------- My intuition tells me that this is probably a dead end,mpg wise.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
10-06-2008, 02:31 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
aerostatic
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5
Blue - '04 Chevrolet Impala LS 90 day: 29.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
If you have access to a introductory Heat Transfer textbook, you should be able to find out more information about this topic. Most hx books contain at least baisc info about it and may direct you to further reading. Your local library may not have them, but should be able to order them on inter-library loan. Heated surfaces would have some positive effect but on ordinary vehicles the difference wouldn't be enough to notice because the points of separation are very distinctly due to geometry. ie behind the rear-view windows and cabin.
I'm sure if results were to be taken in the lab, positive results could be recorded for shapes that are more aerodynamic which do not regularly experience flow separation but my guess is that positive results would be obtained only at higher temps than would occur from solar heating.
|
|
|
02-25-2011, 01:23 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
if the surface temperature is increase, we heat the surface and insulate from inside, so that the passenger won't feel hot?
does this decrease the drag?
|
|
|
02-25-2011, 01:40 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Sure! Snow and ice melt off black vehicles sooner and more completely, so that makes 'em sleeker.
|
|
|
02-25-2011, 10:03 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 403
Thanks: 1
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
Sure! Snow and ice melt off black vehicles sooner and more completely, so that makes 'em sleeker.
|
I have not been here long, but I do get a giggle when Frank gives one of his 'short and sweet' answers.
|
|
|
02-25-2011, 04:49 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
DieselMiser
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
|
NACA did some tests and the results in drag were not all too great.
EDIT: I meant to state that they had little effect
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...1979070772.pdf
__________________
Last edited by ConnClark; 02-25-2011 at 08:01 PM..
|
|
|
02-25-2011, 10:00 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master Ecomadman
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
|
Colder air is denser and has less viscosity, therefore would remain attached longer in adverse pressure gradients and have a thinner boundary layer. I think that a cold surface would have less drag for body dominated by surface drag and not much effect on a blunt body like a car.
__________________
- Tony
|
|
|
|