07-20-2013, 02:18 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
|
An engine cycle where intake valves only open in the last part of intake cycle?
Would this work?
Has this been tried before?
If during the intake of the 4-stroke cycle
intake valves remain closed, say, during the first half of the piston downward travel.
Some vacuum MIGHT form during the piston downward travel.
Then during the last half, the intake valves open, sucking air fuel mixture all of sudden.
I said MIGHT as some warm exhaust gas might be intentionally left in the cylinder, which will expand, compensating some of the vacuum created by the piston moving down.
I believe this will reduce part-throttle pumping losses.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
07-20-2013, 03:50 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
We call that retarding the intake phase.
Its normally used to boost horsepower not MPGs.
Early opening and early closing has always been used to increase fuel economy.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
07-20-2013, 11:36 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324
MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
|
seems like it would drop efficiency, since work would be required to generate the vacuum in the cylinder. the amount of residual gasses would have to be pretty significant to prevent a vacuum from being formed.
for the "instant suck" to happen, there would have to be a vacuum in the cylinder, the larger the vacuum, the more significant the "sucking".
__________________
|
|
|
07-20-2013, 03:00 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Late and/or early intake valve closure has been used before for efficiency improvement. It's typically called Miller cycling or Atkitson cycling (depending on who you ask). The Toyota Prius engine uses this. The effect is an expansion ratio which is greater than the compression ratio. What you're suggesting wouldn't change the effective compression ratio and I'm not sure as how it would reduce pumping losses. Remeber that lower cylinder pressure on the intake stroke is going to increase pumping losses.
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
07-20-2013, 09:32 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: World
Posts: 385
Thanks: 82
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
|
Considering just the idealised cycle on a PV diagram there will be unrecoverable pumping work done during the part of the "intake" stroke where the valve remains closed.
This is different to early or late inlet valve closing where the pressure remains trapped in the cylinder and the work done in generating it can be recovered.
Last edited by Occasionally6; 07-22-2013 at 01:50 AM..
Reason: Brain ahead of fingers
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 12:51 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Instead of trying to get around pumping losses why not switch to a cycle that benefits from filling the cylinders with as much air as possible?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 03:31 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,703
Thanks: 8,147
Thanked 8,925 Times in 7,368 Posts
|
I'll take the opportunity to mention one of my favorite things, the Scuderi Split-Cycle
Scuderi engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
|
07-22-2013, 01:55 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: World
Posts: 385
Thanks: 82
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Instead of trying to get around pumping losses why not switch to a cycle that benefits from filling the cylinders with as much air as possible?
|
Making an assumption about what you are implying :
All else being equal a CI engine (idealized as constant pressure combustion) is less efficient than a SI engine (idealized as constant volume combustion).
Of course all is not equal and there remains potential in trying to minimise the losses in SI engines.
|
|
|
|