10-11-2009, 05:45 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Frank's post above is an example of his sarcastic humor.
|
HEY! I resemble that remark!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-11-2009, 05:48 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...that's not sarcasim, it's "barnyard" engineering analyses at its best!
Last edited by gone-ot; 10-12-2009 at 08:55 PM..
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 09:59 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norfolk, Va. USA
Posts: 869
Thanks: 14
Thanked 33 Times in 28 Posts
|
I was laughing so hard my dog looked at me as if to ask, "should I call 911 or not?"
Go Frank Go
__________________
When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity.
Albert Einstein
|
|
|
10-14-2009, 12:52 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadisonMPG
That's one of those vehicles, that you might as well not worry about mileage.
|
I disagree too.
But of all the 65+ mods, I'd start with instrumentation first, since modifying your driving style will net you the quickest, potentially largest savings.
Also, you probably already figured this out, but if you're calculating your fuel consumption in "MPG", you'll see relatively small changes in absolute, numerical terms. (Dunno if you're using L/100 km in real life, since you're a Canuck.)
Going from, say, 15 to 17 mpg in fuel savings & monetary terms is absolutely worth going after.
|
|
|
10-14-2009, 12:53 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
PS: yup, thanks for the laugh Frank.
|
|
|
10-14-2009, 01:51 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 19
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Well Metro I use mathematical conversions to calculate actual MPG rather than using L/100km. Yep that's what I used to use however it isn't accepted here as its an american site LOL...
And I am planning on getting a new guage, however when that is I dunno, however I've already modified the nut behind the wheel. (Frankly I think everyone that gets a new vehicle should have to drive 20clicks on black ice to adjust their driving habits. I didn't realise just how much more power etc this vehicle used than my old one and that was a wake up call as to my lead footed ness...) Also I removed the cross bars from the roof rack, was going to remove the whole thing but the friggen screws wouldn't come off...
|
|
|
10-14-2009, 09:15 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
I'd suggest continuing to adjust the nut behind the wheel. I know I'm always tweaking things here or there to see if it increases my FE. Your current fuel log shows you at ~4% above the 2008 EPA rating. General conservative driving should get you at least 20% above 2008 EPA. If you think you are really already at that point, I'd look at the vehicle to see if there is any maintenance issues with it that may be reducing your mileage.
Last edited by Daox; 10-14-2009 at 09:28 AM..
|
|
|
10-14-2009, 10:53 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Oh, and do a block heater too. That'll make a noticeable difference in your winter fuel economy.
|
|
|
10-15-2009, 08:52 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 19
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Thanx, its already got a block heater lol
|
|
|
|