10-24-2013, 02:25 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,892
Thanks: 506
Thanked 868 Times in 654 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacemanspif
Metro: are you recommending an auto for a highway car? Care to explain why? I know autos are caught up to manuals when it comes to efficiency but I thought manuals still have the advantage?
|
He is stating that the auto could be used on the highway, I don't think he recommended it, more of a if you have to it could be used.
The reason autos trash manuals in some models is because of ideotic gearing used on the MT varient, all autos loose a few percent over the MT at a minimum, they just usualy now come with better gearing.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-24-2013, 02:47 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
EcoPlotting
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 101
Thanks: 18
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
From my experience the elantra does not due well in the cold. Sub 50*F, I see at least a 15-25% drop in efficiency if not more in the winter. I don't know if anyone else sees that bad of a change. Texas is usually 80-30F in the winter and 70-110F in the summer. These are really rough numbers.
__________________
|
|
|
10-24-2013, 03:03 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Saratoga County, NY
Posts: 170
TheEgg - '18 Volkswagen Tiguan SEL Premium 90 day: 29.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
|
Well, all cars will suffer in the cold. I've never heard of Hyundais being worse than anything else, but I suppose it's possible. All I know is my old boss's started at -25F.
__________________
|
|
|
10-24-2013, 03:09 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Lots of Questions
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
|
Where is the air intake on the elantra? If it is a stock 'CAI' of sorts, then that could, at least partially, explain the big drop.
__________________
Don't forget to like our Facebook page!
Best EM Quotes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
It has been said, that if you peel the duct tape back on Earth's equator, you'll find that the two hemispheres are held together with J B Weld.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan9
subscribed with a soda.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
If you're burning,and someone throws gasoline on you,there will be a localized cooling effect, but you're still on fire.
|
|
|
|
10-24-2013, 03:21 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
EcoPlotting
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 101
Thanks: 18
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
It does have 2-3??? separate tubes for bring air into the air filter box. One is blocked by my upper grill block at the moment. Maybe I need to look into a WAI.
__________________
|
|
|
10-24-2013, 03:44 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
The automatic Fit does a lot better. It's at 2150 @ 60 mph instead of 2850. The advantages of a manual are mainly at low speed, so if your driving is mainly highway I wouldn't hesitate to get the auto.
__________________
![](http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig268a.png)
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
10-24-2013, 09:46 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Spaced out...
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 748
Thanks: 142
Thanked 205 Times in 149 Posts
|
Thanks for explaining everyone. Seems every nugget of info. I get about the auto industry, the more I hate it. Manuals with only "sport" gearing...how about adding an "eco" gear resulting in a close ratio 5spd with a big overdrive 6th...or 7th...I don't car how many of their gears I have to skip, just give me over 45mpg@65mph...
__________________
-Mike
2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans ![Frown](/forum/images/smilies/frown.gif)
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014
Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"
|
|
|
10-25-2013, 11:05 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacemanspif
Thanks for explaining everyone. Seems every nugget of info. I get about the auto industry, the more I hate it. Manuals with only "sport" gearing...how about adding an "eco" gear resulting in a close ratio 5spd with a big overdrive 6th...or 7th...I don't car how many of their gears I have to skip, just give me over 45mpg@65mph...
|
YES! If you're doing the sport thing you're going to be in gears 1,2,3. My 3rd gear maxes out at 78 mph, 4th at 108. Who needs a "sporty" 5th gear? If you're driving that way you're not going to be using 5th.
__________________
![](http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig268a.png)
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
10-25-2013, 01:09 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 264
gueff - '19 Mercedes Benz A250 4MATIC AMG 90 day: 30.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 79 Times in 33 Posts
|
wow thanks for all the responses people. She did consider the manual but with heavy traffic that might be a pain so she will probably go for the auto. we did a 24hr test drive of both the fit and the elantra this week and thr fit returned about 28mpg for city driving and the elantra about 23mpg. the fit was also more fun to drive and had lots of cargo for her needs. the elantra had more gadgets and she liked the technology better. 23mpg was a turn off for me since thats what I get with my 4wd subaru around town. but that could be because the hyundai only had 10k miles. although the hyundai was better equipped she will probably buy the fit for lower costs. I still think hypermiling in the fit will return better results with smaller more proven engine and the 100lbs weight saving.
but back to epa ratings I have more examples. my subaru which weighs nearly 3200lbs and has a full time AWD system returned about 33.5mpg for a 150 mile highway trip with no fancy tricks. I just cruised at 70-75mph the whole way. this is much better than the 27mpg epa rating. at the same time driving the hyundai for a short while on the highway returned only about 36mpg for about 70mph cruising (lower than epa). I noticed that a lot of times on slight grades and uphills the elantra had to downshift to maintain speed (a no no in hypermiling). the subaru however could just take the grade without downshifting, this was in part due to the higher displacement as well as shorter gearing (2800rpm at 70mph). I think the epa doesnt take grades and more realistic factors into consideration. yes I didnt have time to take the elantra for a 150mile exact same trip but we averaged 5mph slower highway speed. didnt have time to test the fit on the highway but at one time I saw the trip computer dip into 40mpg territory while cruising at 70mph for a short while. the honda tranny downshifted less than the elantra on the highway.
ps. it seems epa highway tests are done at 48mph avg speed. of course real world highway speeds are much higher. also apparentlly tests are done on chasis dynos which doesnt take aero drag into consideration?
__________________
Last edited by ever_green; 10-25-2013 at 01:42 PM..
|
|
|
10-25-2013, 01:58 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
EcoPlotting
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 101
Thanks: 18
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
At a steady 65mph the Elantra will return its epa 38mpg. At 75mph 33mpg. With a upper grill block and tires at 41-42 psi I returned just over 42 mpg at 65.
The EPA is working on auditing manufactures data in order to try to take car of discrepancies.
__________________
Last edited by night9; 10-25-2013 at 04:05 PM..
|
|
|
|