Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-26-2012, 02:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
meters to feet help

2007 Kia Sportage Aerodynamics



Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw) 0.3

Frontal area (A) 2.62 m2 (est.)



Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) 0.78 m2 (est.)

Aerodynamic resistance (Aero horse power) at 100 km/h (62 mph)19.5 kW (est.)


can anybody translate to feet?

__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-26-2012, 03:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
2.62 square meters is 28.2 square feet
.78 square meters is 8.4 square feet
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 03:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
can anybody translate to feet?
Well 19.5kW@62mpg is like chewing on someone elses toe nail clippings.
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
mcrews (11-26-2012)
Old 11-26-2012, 03:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
FYI, Google has a "built in" conversion utility.

https://www.google.com/search?q=1+sq...to+square+feet
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
mcrews (11-26-2012)
Old 11-26-2012, 03:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
Convert This!

FYI too, EngNET I been using this web page for years on converting anything to anything. Cept water-wine and lead-gold.....any links for those????
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
mcrews (11-26-2012)
Old 11-26-2012, 04:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: MO.
Posts: 71

the turd - '88 honda civic 4dr DX
90 day: 73.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
most cell phones have a unit converter in its tools
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 05:54 PM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I use the google utility- it's right there!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 10:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
3.280833333 feet in a meter. Permanently pounded into my memory during years of surveying. Before the days of permanent memory in calculators, we would shoot a distance with our laser with the switch turned to "meters". Then we would change it to "feet" and shoot it again. In the meantime, the notekeeper would multiply the meter reading by the factor (3.280833333) and compare the result with what the "feet" readout from the laser was saying. This was mostly to double-check the reading & guard against writing down (or reading) a wrong numeral(s). If the "feet" measurment agreed with the "converted" metric measurement, it meant we read & wrote it down right.

Lots of double- & triple-checking in surveying. Much better to find an error right away. Having to go figure out why the traverse didn't "close" after you thought you were already done could be a nightmare - sometimes requiring us to do the whole thing over again. Much easier to just measure everything twice (or 3 times) the first time around.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com