Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-06-2012, 12:10 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge LA
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Experiment I did in the past that worked WHY?

I have done many mods on SUVs over the year to increase mileage. Many my own ideas experiments, mainly dealing with air intake. I did countless 100% highway drives with little to no. Hange except one thing. At one time I did something stupid but don't worry the engine was nothing worth protecting.

Basically I put a pair of pantyhose on the air intake. Removing the filter I did this for 1 tank. I had never gotten gas mileage that good before or after. I experience a 30% increase I'm has mileage. Why?

I don't understand it. The vehicle was modern obdii injected mass airflow sensor o2 sensors. So the mixture of air to fuel should have been the same. Also if your vehicle requires a certain amount of power to maintain its speed an increase of possible power shouldn't change anything. Why did this work? It wasn't my driving style I have driven much better.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-06-2012, 12:17 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Measurement error. Placebo. A nice tailwind. Take your pick, but it wasn't the pantyhose.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 12:23 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge LA
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Neither ^
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 12:28 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
go recreate it about 10 times.

report back
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to drmiller100 For This Useful Post:
Sven7 (04-06-2012)
Old 04-06-2012, 12:43 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: houston
Posts: 374

Black Knight - '94 Toyota Corolla
Team Toyota
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 38 Times in 33 Posts
where they black or tan?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to deathtrain For This Useful Post:
Sven7 (04-06-2012)
Old 04-06-2012, 12:46 AM   #6 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Were they... nah, better not go there.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 05:04 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 355

The Truck - '02 Nissan GU Patrol ST
Thanks: 5
Thanked 76 Times in 50 Posts
What sort of engine was it, if it was a diesel, then I'd believe it, removing the restriction would improve economy considerably.
Do you still have the vehicle?, if so, as said above do it again.
Also, when was the filter changed before that & was it the right spec filter?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 10:31 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge LA
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesla View Post
What sort of engine was it, if it was a diesel, then I'd believe it, removing the restriction would improve economy considerably.
Do you still have the vehicle?, if so, as said above do it again.
Also, when was the filter changed before that & was it the right spec filter?
It was a gasoline land rover discovery. About a year later I drive into water over the windows offloading and got rid of it. air filter was new. As a matter of fact I tried replacing it with a highflow cone filter to no avail. But the difference with no restriction was incredible. It was no fluke. As I got way more miles to the tank than normal and I document all fuel consumption doing the math it came out to 22mpg from 16
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 10:57 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: london, on
Posts: 355

Buggie - '01 Vw Beetle TDI Gls
Thanks: 4
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
I have a discovery. It is a pig. Maybe increasing the restriction would make thE engine think its under lesser load and not add so much gas
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 02:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 7
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
when you did this experiment, did any other variables change at the same time?
Did you go from a very small restrictive oem filter to no restriction, allowing the big piggy engine to operate with less vacuum? Do you have a vacuum gauge to measure changes being made?
Did your panty hose on the end of a hose drastically change the location air was being pulled from, ie from the relatively cold outside to the relatively warm inside, near an exhaust header or similar?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com