Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2014, 04:02 PM   #31 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
You put the EGR cooler in your exhaust stream and then plumb it into your heater core circuit, instant heat or faster warm ups and to some degree both.
I have a couple ideas as to how, but none are necessary cheap/simple.... but any thoughts as to how to force a significant amount of exhaust gasses through the cooler that doesn't involve repurposing some exhaust cutouts to make the exhaust path going through the cooler receive more flow than a path that doesn't have the cooler?

I could see the cooler receiving significant flow if it were used as an alternate path for exhaust that would otherwise flow through a cat.

Trying to route all of the exhaust through the cooler will work fine with certain engines, but they look like they would become super restrictive on anything that uses exhaust tubing larger than the ~1.5" they appear to be. could run them in parallel to allow more flow through them, but that could run into size/complexity issues pretty quickly.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-05-2014, 01:50 PM   #32 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
I was just going to use exhaust cut outs. They are very common OE on older 1980s vehicles. Most are vacuum or mechanically controlled.

You don't want all the engines exhaust trying to go through the cooler while running at speed. Plus you will want a way to close off flow to the exhaust heat exchanger when the weather warms back up. All of it at idle while warming up might be nice.

I think after the catalytic converter would be the best place to put it. The exhaust will be hotter and contain less soot.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 01:57 PM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
it wouldn't be too out of the way to build a small controller to try and handle most, if not all, of those functions automatically.

after-cat: yes, in a goal of making the most of the fuel, it would be wise to place it right after a device that's purpose is to essentially take any unburned fuel still in the exhaust and light it up.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 01:46 AM   #34 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Control systems would be doable.
Vacuum thermostats and shutter stats were widely used before computer controls.
They are still used in some applications.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2015, 06:39 AM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AndrzejM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840

Berta - '97 BMW 318 tds Compact
90 day: 62.03 mpg (US)

Charlie - '07 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso Exclusive
90 day: 37.58 mpg (US)

Corsa - '05 Opel Corsa C
90 day: 53.22 mpg (US)

Mruczek - '03 Audi A2
90 day: 60.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
Subscribed
__________________


Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2015, 04:26 PM   #36 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: AZ
Posts: 67
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Timing

I wonder if you were to adjust cam timing on the intake as BACK as you could go..... Is the cam timing independently adjustable? You could try to make it almost an atkinson type engine. Hang the intake valves open 20-30 degrees past bdc. I bet that would help fuel economy big time. It would hurt power a bit, So I figure other mods like electric water/oil pump would help compensate for that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 12:31 AM   #37 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 57
Thanks: 1
Thanked 63 Times in 22 Posts
Hi 'ya Synergy,

Right now the engine has a stock non adjustable cam sprocket. Once I establish some baseline data I'll install the adjustable sprocket and we'll see what effects it will make. Since this is a single cam engine, both the intake and exhaust timing are effected. Should be interesting. The tests will be videoed and the cam sprocket test is #2 on the list.

Its been pretty cold in Michigan however I have been busy hammering away at the software. I think I'll have a fully automatic version 1.0 working by the weekend.

I should have some more updates soon.

Jim
__________________
G10 powered Mazda MX5 45+ MPG(sold)
B3 powered Mazda MX5 40+ MPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 10:31 AM   #38 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 57
Thanks: 1
Thanked 63 Times in 22 Posts
Sorry for the lack of updates, I have been busy writing software and working out test procedures.

Well, The dyno is now operational and can run pre-recorded tests. Fuel usage varies +- 2 grams on a 15 mile simulation...That is pretty good.








I shot an introduction video back in February and plan on shooting more video's on various experiments. https://youtu.be/q8Fu02ti93c



More updates coming soon,

Jim
__________________
G10 powered Mazda MX5 45+ MPG(sold)
B3 powered Mazda MX5 40+ MPG
  Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to fujioko For This Useful Post:
Daox (04-02-2015), echo-francis (04-02-2015), freebeard (04-02-2015), Joggernot (04-02-2015), MetroMPG (04-02-2015), mikeyjd (04-02-2015), pgfpro (04-02-2015), Piwoslaw (12-11-2015), RustyLugNut (04-02-2015)
Old 04-02-2015, 12:49 PM   #39 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Super impressive. The YT video is really good!
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 12:51 PM   #40 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
Incredible work, seriously. Thank you for doing this and sharing it with us Jim!

__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com