Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-11-2010, 01:43 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
I'm not sure if this would work but could you just run 10 8v batteries in a parallel/series setup to give you 40v. I know it would increase the amps but I'm not sure if it would increase the aH.

Or if you would run two strings of 4 12v for 48v and switch to the second string when the batteries are low on the first. This would allow you to also charge one string while using the other.

__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-21-2010, 10:18 PM   #22 (permalink)
Ford Escort 2.0
 
TomEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 240

Electricar - '89 Ford Escort LX Hatchback
Thanks: 6
Thanked 27 Times in 24 Posts
Experiments can support or help disprove theories. In this case it appears that FW may have some positive effect, but the gains are relatively low.

Here are the latest numbers -

Day Miles wH/mi
1 - 11.9 - 224
2 - 13.9 - 217
3 - 11.3 - 232
4 - 23 - 227
5 - 15 - 220
6 - 14.1 - 194
7 - 7.9 - 252
8 - 4.9 - 229
9 - 9.4 - 223
10 - 5.6 - 220
11 - 11.9 - 231
12 - 11.4 - 222
13 - 8.9 - 221
14 - 9.9 - 235
15 - 13 - 242

Average wH/mi with FW on - 226 (FW on during steady state driving)
Average wH/mi with FW off - 229 (from previous months)

So far, the experiment points to the use of FW during certain drive environments as not producing a significant difference. I'd probably need about 30 samples to produce a reliable trend line.

Overall this month, I'm at 229 wH/mi using mixed FW and non FW driving, which is about my normal level of efficiency.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2010, 10:12 PM   #23 (permalink)
Ford Escort 2.0
 
TomEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 240

Electricar - '89 Ford Escort LX Hatchback
Thanks: 6
Thanked 27 Times in 24 Posts
Field Weakening - November's Experiment Draws to a Close

Here are the final numbers -

Day Miles wH/mi
1 - 11.9 - 224
2 - 13.9 - 217
3 - 11.3 - 232
4 - 23 - 227
5 - 15 - 220
6 - 14.1 - 194
7 - 7.9 - 252
8 - 4.9 - 229
9 - 9.4 - 223
10 - 5.6 - 220
11 - 11.9 - 231
12 - 11.4 - 222
13 - 8.9 - 221
14 - 9.9 - 235
15 - 13 - 242
16 - 8.7 - 218
17 - 18 - 235

Average wH/mi with FW on - 226 (FW on during steady state driving)
Average wH/mi with FW off - 229 (from previous months)

Overall this month, I used 232 wH/mi using mixed FW and non FW driving, which is about my normal level of efficiency. According to the data, Field Weakening doesn't improve efficiency to a significant degree at mid power levels.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
electric car, field weakening



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paul and Sabrina's Cheap 3 Phase Inverter (AC Controller) with Field Oriented Control MPaulHolmes Fossil Fuel Free 3480 05-04-2022 05:43 PM
Wake field of pickup KamperBob Aerodynamics 28 07-14-2011 01:52 PM
Fuel Warmer and Fuel magnet? boostanddestroy EcoModding Central 42 04-25-2010 04:48 PM
Deactivating Alternator Field wire Noel DIY / How-to 13 08-28-2008 01:40 PM
Field Weakening Experiment for Speed Increase TomEV Fossil Fuel Free 12 04-10-2008 03:53 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com