Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-11-2012, 01:22 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,016

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,870
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,555 Posts
Why don't they come this way from the factory? This sounds like a fantastic, easy mod.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-11-2012, 02:01 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
christofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 292

00C - '00 Toyota Corolla
90 day: 43.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 190 Times in 73 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by christofoo View Post
The exhaust gas gets up to around 500-600 C, but exterior to the pipe nowhere near that hot. I put a K-type thermistor inside the cat shell, for my curiosity, on my Corolla which has the cat located under the floor. My highest reading was 260 C, IIRC. Inside the engine bay with grille blocks it could be hotter, but I'd bet against anything much over 350 C, even touching the exhaust manifold.

I remember someone around here having a fire blanket attached to the hood. I can't find the thread or remember who it was.

EDIT: I remember now:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post333037
I can't help but play devil's advocate, the exhaust components may be ~300 C when surrounded by 80 C air, but if you put an insulative material over them, the pipe could get a lot closer to exhaust gas temp.

Still, exhaust gas itself isn't that much hotter than the max fire blanket rating. I think if you don't go out of your way to create a hazard, i.e. multiple layers of fire blanket all the way around part of the exhaust, you'll very likely end up with a significant safety margin.

That's my guess, FWIW.

BTW, I'm pretty sure lean burn is cooler than stoichiometric (conservation of energy).
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 02:46 AM   #13 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Another option would be to cut a hole in it where you fear it's too close to the exhaust parts. It would still be mostly effective.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 10:01 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
2000neon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 596

VX - '94 Honda Civic VX
Team Honda
90 day: 47.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 133
Thanked 89 Times in 66 Posts
I'm still pretty sure that running lean results in hotter temperatures.

That's a good idea Frank, I should be able to put a hole right above the exhaust and converter but still get a nice improvement.

I'm going to ask around and see if someone has an infrared thermometer that I could borrow to see what sort of temps I've actually got.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com