01-14-2009, 12:25 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
If you run all day long at Wide Open Throttle, it might help a tiny bit. In real world driving, it usually doesn't. It might actually hurt engine efficiency. And then there's the temptation to floor it, just to hear that sound.
I wouldn't do it.
I a previous life, I put dual Flowmasters on my Suburban. The started rusting within a year. I live in Texas, where there is no salt on the roads. They're not the best quality. I then moved on to the Cherry Bombs. Sounded amazing. Neither did anything for mileage, though. That's when I traded it in for a Civic.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 12:36 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark
The fact that they are so cheap means you will get a quicker return on investment.
|
"Return on investment"???
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 12:41 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Well, if you start with the assumption that they do improve mileage...
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 12:58 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
Well, if you start with the assumption that they do improve mileage...
|
That has been researched, looked at, hashed over, re-hashed over, re-re-hash-hashed over, not to mention done to death, and it just plain doesn't work that way.
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 01:02 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
'zactly. I totally agree with you. I guess my e-subtlety ( ) was too subtle.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 01:04 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Frank and PaleMelanesian are completely right. You won't see any improvement in FE from replacing your muffler. Your car will just be louder, thats all.
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 01:27 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
'zactly. I totally agree with you. I guess my e-subtlety ( ) was too subtle.
|
I got it~ I just wanted to use my new dead horse gif! LOL
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 02:03 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
I'll have to save that one for later. So many times it can be useful!
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
01-14-2009, 06:00 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
high school
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston, Ma.
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeah i didnt expect any FE gain from just the muffler, but what about an entire new exhaust system... like from the headers back.? or is it again with the, if any, "immeasureable" gains if there are any and the definite debate in regards to there being gains at all.
__________________
|
|
|
|