Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-16-2023, 10:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Spokane Valley
Posts: 47

War Pig - '01 Ford Taurus SEL
Thanks: 3
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Ford Explorer 5.0 Proposal

What is your guys thoughts on attempting a mid to mild mpg build on a 2001 5.0 explorer? 13/18 avg stock mpg

If I choose this route almost everything on the vehicle will be rebuilt or replaced. Suspension, balal joints, rear axles, brakes, fluids, full engine and transmission rebuild. I want it to basically be "new".

For the engine I'd do a rebuild. I would mill off 30 thousands of the heads increasing compression ratio to 9.6/1. Mildly increase initial and base timing. Electric fan. Full synthetic oil. Keep or replace with the milder explorer cam and not replace with the GT hotter cam. EGR block. Any other ideas?

Replace the AWD system with the F150 4x4 system. It does not seem to difficult to achieve and seems to greatly increase drivetrain efficiency.

Replace rims with equal size lighter weight rims. Build a front aero under tray/off-road engine protector.

Any other ideas, what kind of MPG could I expect off this build? Or maybe go with a SUV that's already more fuel efficient?

__________________
First: 2001 Ford Taurus Eco Build Thread

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...s-33334-2.html
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-17-2023, 12:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Growin a stash
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 793
Thanks: 409
Thanked 303 Times in 227 Posts
My parents had one of those. I wouldn't do it unless you really like the vehicle.

Theirs was mechanically reliable but the interior was falling apart. Big time clunker.

Maybe a Subaru would be better?
__________________


2024 Chevy Bolt

Previous:
2015 Nissan Leaf S, 164 mpge
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2023, 06:41 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,961

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 38.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,833
Thanked 2,467 Times in 1,531 Posts
It's hard to start with a less efficient vehicle, so from that perspective, I guess there's a lot of low hanging fruit. I second ME_Andy's opinion. Do it if you love it. There are few enough vehicles on the road anymore that are easy to love.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2023, 11:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,598 Times in 1,426 Posts
If you replace the AWD with a part-time 4WD, get free-wheel hubs, otherwise it will still have too much drag from the front differential.

As far as the electric fan goes, it can do wonders.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2023, 11:44 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Spokane Valley
Posts: 47

War Pig - '01 Ford Taurus SEL
Thanks: 3
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
If you replace the AWD with a part-time 4WD, get free-wheel hubs, otherwise it will still have too much drag from the front differential.

As far as the electric fan goes, it can do wonders.
I will definitely have to look into that further! Thank you I wouldn't of thought of that
__________________
First: 2001 Ford Taurus Eco Build Thread

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...s-33334-2.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2023, 10:44 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,165

Sport Utility Prius - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 52.98 mpg (US)

300k Sequoia 4WD - '01 Toyota Sequoia Limited 4wd
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 259 Times in 208 Posts
If you don't need a 4wd I would go wild and put a massively small rear ratio in the rear end. That would be the benefit of owning a Ford. Limitless rear gear capabilities. I was averaging 25mpg in a 3.0 Ford Ranger with 3.73s but i bet with 3.08s or below i could've been at 30's. That's kinda my least favorite part about my Sequoia is no available gear swaps to decrease rpm's.
__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2023, 11:53 AM   #7 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 3,864
Thanks: 434
Thanked 1,069 Times in 944 Posts
Unsure gearing will help a ranger, maybe the later round nose ones.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2023, 12:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Spokane Valley
Posts: 47

War Pig - '01 Ford Taurus SEL
Thanks: 3
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko View Post
Unsure gearing will help a ranger, maybe the later round nose ones.
Gearing is one of the biggest changes you can make to a vehicle. For the most part, taller gearing will almost always help mpg on the highway. I'm used to a 95hp 4cyl truck so with an explorer making more than double the power I could probably get away with taller gearing, even if only go a little taller.

However I wonder how it would affect city milage???

__________________
First: 2001 Ford Taurus Eco Build Thread

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...s-33334-2.html
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com