Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-30-2019, 07:46 PM   #41 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,691
Thanks: 7,774
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
Fjords are good, ya!
Are you pining for the fjords?

__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-30-2019, 10:53 PM   #42 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,177 Times in 807 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
They reduce the neutron poisons by running a very enriched reactor fuel blend. We are talking so highly enriched it's not anywhere near commercially viable for power generation.
I'm just generally talking the point at which they consider the fuel spent. I was 11 years a nuclear power plant operator and reactor chemist in the navy. Thankfully I have forgotten all the stuff I probably am not supposed to tell. I will say there ain't nobody as good and safe at running nuclear power as the US Navy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2019, 12:27 AM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: California
Posts: 513

2020 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H
Last 3: 18.4 mpg (US)

2021 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H
90 day: 17.08 mpg (US)

2022 - '08 chevy Tahoe LT
Last 3: 14.38 mpg (US)

2023 - '08 Chevy Tahoe
Last 3: 22.61 mpg (US)

2024 - '08 Chevy Tahoe
90 day: 22.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 96 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
I'm just generally talking the point at which they consider the fuel spent. I was 11 years a nuclear power plant operator and reactor chemist in the navy. Thankfully I have forgotten all the stuff I probably am not supposed to tell. I will say there ain't nobody as good and safe at running nuclear power as the US Navy.

not really you may have not heard of the Semi valley,CA disaster a government ran disaster area
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2019, 12:28 AM   #44 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: California
Posts: 513

2020 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H
Last 3: 18.4 mpg (US)

2021 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H
90 day: 17.08 mpg (US)

2022 - '08 chevy Tahoe LT
Last 3: 14.38 mpg (US)

2023 - '08 Chevy Tahoe
Last 3: 22.61 mpg (US)

2024 - '08 Chevy Tahoe
90 day: 22.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 96 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Nothing wrong with the prius. I can say for sure more straight white guys and soccer mom's drive them than anything.

Who cares where electricity comes from its way cheaper to power an EV than fuel an SUV. Plus everywhere in the country coals market share is being eaten away and replaced by wind and natural gas.

When spent nuclear fuel is recycled it doesn't last tens of thousands of years. The unwanted waste isotopes loose approximately 99.99% of their radioactivity after 40 years when the waste and fuel are seperated.
Then the recycled mixed oxide fuel is stable and ready to use for tens of thousands of years.
Our current plan is to use nuclear fuel once, which consumes up to 5% of the fissile elements, then put it all in "temporary storage" permanently. Which is the stupidest plan anyone would possibly come up with. Thank politicians and nimbly useful idiots.
The reason the spent fuel stays highly radioactive for so long is because the vast majority of the "spent fuel" is still fissile material.
soccer mom dads drive them lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2019, 10:43 AM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,177 Times in 807 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe_Hybrid View Post
not really you may have not heard of the Semi valley,CA disaster a government ran disaster area
Not US Navy, the US Army also blew up a reactor in the Idaho desert.

Here is the navy's blurb, "The US Navy has accumulated over 6200 reactor-years of accident-free experience involving 526 nuclear reactor cores over the course of 240 million kilometres, without a single radiological incident, over a period of more than 50 years."

Last edited by Hersbird; 08-31-2019 at 12:31 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2019, 02:51 PM   #46 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by thingstodo View Post
I would settle for a mild hybrid.
Recently I got to take a look at a Mercedes-Benz C200 EQ-Boost.



Even though 48V might seem too low, its 14hp and 118lb.ft. could already move it at a reasonable pace if it was possible to get it coupled while the ICE is off.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2019, 10:14 PM   #47 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Saskatoon, canada
Posts: 1,488

Ford Prefect - '18 Ford F150 XLT XTR

Tess - '22 Tesla Y LR
Thanks: 749
Thanked 565 Times in 447 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Recently I got to take a look at a Mercedes-Benz C200 EQ-Boost.

Even though 48V might seem too low, its 14hp and 118lb.ft. could already move it at a reasonable pace if it was possible to get it coupled while the ICE is off.
48V ( more like 55V for just-off-the-charger lead-acid cells) at 500A is 30 - 35-ish HP peak. Kinda like the original under-powered (IMHO) beatle.

Driving each of the 4 wheels with a 10 - 15 HP electric motor and a 5:1 gear reduction ... would get you up to 65 mph ... eventually ...

35 HP on each wheel and a 4:1 gear reduction would get you a speeding ticket ... but you might overheat the heck out of the motors
__________________
In THEORY there is no difference between Theory and Practice
In PRACTICE there IS!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thingstodo For This Useful Post:
Xist (09-08-2019)
Old 09-10-2019, 02:43 PM   #48 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,691
Thanks: 7,774
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
Quote:
48V ( more like 55V for just-off-the-charger lead-acid cells) at 500A is 30 - 35-ish HP peak. Kinda like the original under-powered (IMHO) beatle.
With a two-speed transmission. Otherwise the (optional oil-cooled) 68hp Toyota/Lexus single-speed is comparable.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2019, 06:34 PM   #49 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by thingstodo View Post
48V ( more like 55V for just-off-the-charger lead-acid cells) at 500A is 30 - 35-ish HP peak. Kinda like the original under-powered (IMHO) beatle.
I'm not sure if that motor-generator on the C200 EQ-Boost ever reaches 500A.


Quote:
Driving each of the 4 wheels with a 10 - 15 HP electric motor and a 5:1 gear reduction ... would get you up to 65 mph ... eventually ...
Considering the torque output, just one of those motor-generator units could already be enough to move it. Even though it's not a fair comparison to a 50hp VW EA827 1.6D such as the one an uncle of mine had adapted to a Suzuki Vitara, the motor-generator has a little more than 50% torque.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com