Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-26-2013, 06:16 AM   #41 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,002
Thanks: 8,231
Thanked 9,003 Times in 7,437 Posts
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr --
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO
The future is still a battle between battery chemistry and fuel cells.
Meanwhile, as far as internal combustion engines go, I'd still keep the Diesels as a primary choice.
Lately, I've taken a liking to the Scuderi Air-Hybrid. But with extra compressed air storage that can be recharged overnight.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-26-2013, 03:21 PM   #42 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 113
Thanks: 16
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I don't think fuel cells will be able to power a road vehicle with satisfactory performance with out batteries or capacitors.
That would seem to agree with the Honda FCX Clarity wikipedia article:
"Main components of the vehicle include fuel cell, two hydrogen tanks behind the rear and ultracapacitors."

Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Believe me, before becoming a dieselhead I used to be favorable to fuel-cells and 10 years ago I even used to think they would be economically-viable in 2015.
Unfortunately, fuel cells suffer from being one of those techs constantly labelled as 'just around the corner' by politicians and journos!
I think the main reasons they are still so economically uncertainty has less to do with improvements in 'cell' technology (including cost reduction) but is more a matter of storage and infrastructure. ... That's why I like this methanol route so much!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2013, 10:09 PM   #43 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,701 Times in 1,519 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air-Hybrid View Post
Unfortunately, fuel cells suffer from being one of those techs constantly labelled as 'just around the corner' by politicians and journos!
Maybe, politicians and jornalists' engagement in a fuel-cell hype takes some credibility away from them. Needless to say how politicians fail, and how many journalists are irresponsible.


Quote:
I think the main reasons they are still so economically uncertainty has less to do with improvements in 'cell' technology (including cost reduction) but is more a matter of storage and infrastructure. ... That's why I like this methanol route so much!
I remember one teacher from my high-school senior year doing some comments about the '89-'90 ethanol crisis in Brazil, when American methanol and even Italian grape ethanol were imported to keep dedicated-ethanol cars running instead of retrofitting them to run on gasoline. He said pure methanol is highly toxic, so it required the gas station attendants to wear an "astronaut suit" to ensure methanol vapors wouldn't penetrate thru their skin, but in Brazilian gas stations some reckless attendants thought they were safe just with a surgical mask
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 09:41 AM   #44 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 113
Thanks: 16
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
He said pure methanol is highly toxic, so it required the gas station attendants to wear an "astronaut suit" to ensure methanol vapors wouldn't penetrate thru their skin, but in Brazilian gas stations some reckless attendants thought they were safe just with a surgical mask.
Wikipedia's page on Methanol Toxicity paints the fuel as having good points and bad, but as generally being no worse than petrol.
And states the "maximum allowed exposure in air is 1260 mg/m³ for methanol, 1900 mg/m³ for ethanol and 900 mg/m³ for gasoline. [Plus] methanol is much less volatile than gasoline".

Also, I don't know about what it's like these days thoughout the Americas but barely any stations pump their own gas here.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 04:03 PM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,002
Thanks: 8,231
Thanked 9,003 Times in 7,437 Posts
There's a least one state (the 33rd ) where Service is a legal requirement.

No need to pump your own gas when your dressed up to go somewhere with clean hands.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 04:55 PM   #46 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
There's a least one state (the 33rd ) where Service is a legal requirement.
...OR and NJ
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 11:01 AM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
topcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: England
Posts: 37

Celica VVTI - '05 Toyota Celica GT VVTI
Team Toyota
90 day: 41.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
I'm surprised no one has mentioned diluting petrol or diesel with methanol. Can it safely be done to a regular car, where does one get hold of methanol, is it cheaper than petrol?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 12:45 PM   #48 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat View Post
I'm surprised no one has mentioned diluting petrol or diesel with methanol. Can it safely be done to a regular car, where does one get hold of methanol, is it cheaper than petrol?
The energy density of methanol is half that of gasoline. On an unmodified fuel injection system this will lead to dangerously lean mixtures as well as significantly reduced mileage.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 01:51 PM   #49 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,308

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,579 Times in 2,842 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat View Post
I'm surprised no one has mentioned diluting petrol or diesel with methanol. Can it safely be done to a regular car, where does one get hold of methanol, is it cheaper than petrol?
No, never ever put more than 1% or 2% methanol in a diesels fuel system and the only time you should be doing that is when you have fuel jelling problems from the cold.

Diesels can burn methanol in place of diesel fuel if you introduce the methanol into the engines intake air.
Water+Methanol injection is slowly becoming more popular over here, mostly to boost engine power. It can be used to reduce diesel consumption.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 03:52 PM   #50 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
This isn't the first time I've heard of Methanol being touted as a future fuel. Early Flexfuel cars were made to run on E85(85% Ethanol) or M85(85% Methanol). Including an experimental Flexfuel Taurus, Escort, and Crown Victoria. Check under History on the wiki page for a brief summary. Flexible-fuel vehicle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
If it could also use CNG or LNG, that would be even more cost-effective, since many of the hydrogen is converted from Natural Gas
Then you have the problem of storing a Gas. It either requires a high pressure air tank or a cooled liquid tank. There is a third option that takes advantage of hydrogen's innate ability to condense better when mixed with a compound but I've never seen this on a production vehicle.

Using a liquid fuel is just plain better for the consumer too. Easier to refill and takes up less interior space. CNG vehicles are still largely limited to fleets due to limited refilling stations available.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
The energy density of methanol is half that of gasoline. On an unmodified fuel injection system this will lead to dangerously lean mixtures as well as significantly reduced mileage.
There have been some studies of running up to 10% Ethanol in a Diesel engine to improve fuel economy. But biodiesel is the only biofuel available from a Diesel pump. I haven't heard of anyone using Methanol as a Diesel additive. :/

__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com