09-14-2016, 10:45 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
Growin a stash
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 819
Thanks: 417
Thanked 310 Times in 233 Posts
|
He had at least one or two good points. But, I still think EVs are better.
__________________
2024 Chevy Bolt
Previous:
2015 Nissan Leaf S, 164 mpge
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-15-2016, 01:46 AM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Even people that don't own a vehicle rely on the infrastructure for the goods and services they consume. Goods don't just magically appear in the home.
|
Even if you're a house-bound agoraphobe, the people who deliver goods and services to your home pay their highway fuel taxes, which are included in the cost of delivery. Prior to EVs, fuel taxes have been about the fairest possible way of allocating cost that doesn't involve massive invasion of privacy, and a huge amount of bookkeeping overhead.
|
|
|
09-15-2016, 02:15 AM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,834
Thanks: 8,188
Thanked 8,956 Times in 7,398 Posts
|
ME_Andy -- That's the art of it; just enough bait, then you set the hook.
jamesqf -- That is the problem, it's on a state-by-state basis. So if for instance Oregon wants to tax by the mile traveled they have to distinguish in-state and out-of-state miles.
Did anyone say panopticon, because that's how you get a panopticon
|
|
|
09-15-2016, 01:35 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,864
Thanks: 4,337
Thanked 4,491 Times in 3,454 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
...allocating cost that doesn't involve massive invasion of privacy, and a huge amount of bookkeeping overhead.
|
The best way to reduce overhead and eliminate privacy issues is to fund infrastructure in regular taxes. People with more money will pay more of the infrastructure, which is fair because they are likely to be the highest consumers of goods and services.
I'm all about elimination of layers of administration and enforcement, and reducing the avenues of cheating. That's why I'm for a federal sales tax and the elimination of all deductions. Send the IRS and most CPAs to the unemployment line.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-15-2016, 01:47 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
FYI: I'll be seeing these friends again this evening. Maybe an update on their decision.
Meanwhile, a neighbour down the street who was interested in the Volt ended up buying a mid-sized SUV. His wife liked it more. Previous vehicle was a Buick Regal sedan.
|
|
|
09-15-2016, 02:38 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
If a tires lifetime road wear could be predicted, then tires could be taxed for road wear in the future, for both electric and fuel burning vehicles.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-15-2016, 08:59 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,834
Thanks: 8,188
Thanked 8,956 Times in 7,398 Posts
|
I'd thought about that; but I hadn't considered the drifters.
It would hasten the advent of 3D printed polyurethane tires.
|
|
|
09-15-2016, 10:54 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Erie, Pa
Posts: 3
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I own a 2014 Chevy Volt that I bought new as a leftover in February 2016.
Range:
Winter 28-30 miles
Summer 42 miles.
The battery is limited to using 10 KW out of 16 KW.
The price for electricity is $.14/per kwhr
So, I drive for 5 cents per mile in the winter and 3.3 cents per mile in the summer.
Additionally, I use this vehicle to do our 250 mile round trips and I seem to get 42 mpg on the highway in pure ICE mode. So, the engine is nice to have.
It is cramped but handles nice-this is the closest to a sports car I'm going to get. The transmission is pure joy and I don't miss the shifting of gears at all. These planetary gearboxes are the future drivetrains IMHO (although it will be powered by hydrogen and not a big heavy battery).
The kids love it- my 16 year old drives it all the time and he thinks it his car. My 14 year says she is going to get it when he leaves for college.
It was very affordable with the US federal tax rebate and my state rebate.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Puddlejumper For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-16-2016, 12:31 AM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puddlejumper
The price for electricity is $.14/per kwhr
So, I drive for 5 cents per mile in the winter and 3.3 cents per mile in the summer.
|
Well, with gas at $2.20/gal hereabouts, and getting 70 mpg in the Insight, I guess fuel cost is another reason I'm not going to be buying a Volt real soon :-(
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 08:49 AM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
It would hasten the advent of 3D printed polyurethane tires.
|
DIY retread kits. Don't let the gubmint keep you down.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
|