Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-19-2011, 07:48 PM   #31 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Here is my 'dead horse' that I keep bringing up from time to time.
This is proof that you can have a blunt 'barn door' front end and still have good aero.

This old '80 Camaro got down to a wind tunnel tested .201 Cd - or just over what the EV-1 achieved.

Chevy Camaro Aerodynamics Side View Photo 7



Also look at the attached flow with the 'barn door' flat front end on this '32 Coupe :



Notice the flow along the roofline as the smoke stream hits the vertical windshield.


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-19-2011, 08:16 PM   #32 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Here is another '32 coupe - this one quite draggy by the looks of the smokestream.

Still, this video gives a good idea of how that a simple rounded edge can keep attached flow - for example along the roofline.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-22-2011), California98Civic (11-20-2011)
Old 11-19-2011, 08:57 PM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
.201 even with that massive scoop??
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 09:37 PM   #34 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
It would certainly be interesting to see a tuft test along the sides of those fenders Frank.

Its hard to tell without tufting it though.

( I hope you do get around to fixing that front end ! Good luck passing inspection without the turn signal lights )
It would be fun to tuft test vs one of my "complete" cars.

There are no inspections. There are turn signal lights.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 02:11 AM   #35 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
.201 even with that massive scoop??
" We did lots of hoodscoop testing with Harwood's scoop part numbers (left to right) 3161, 3164, and 3182 borrowed from Barnett Performance. We also tried our old 6-inch cowl hood and a bone-stock flat hood we borrowed from Camaro Specialty and taped all the scoops in place on that hood. All the scoops were swoopiest when extended back to the windshield. Believe it or not, the cowl and the PN 3182 aero scoop had the very same Cd as the flat hood, and the other two scoops were just 10 counts worse. Better yet, the ram-air of the aero scoop was estimated to give us 24 hp at 250 mph. "

Read more: Chevy Camaro Aerodynamics Hoodscoop Photo 5
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 10:35 AM   #36 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
Frank, your Tempo pic reminds me of the truck grille I have not finished yet.
I get to make a scratch bumper for the truck, and I've been watching this thread. Thanks for all the good info. It looks like I need to build something resembling Jay Leno's chin, yet tasteful. Seems like a tall order to me
__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 09:25 AM   #37 (permalink)
Quasi-Modder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DeForest, Wisconsin
Posts: 144
Thanks: 23
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
While this is for the nose of a streamliner; it is still quite interesting.

http://www.aussieinvader.com/wp-cont..._design_dm.pdf
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2011, 10:40 AM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post

Also look at the attached flow with the 'barn door' flat front end on this '32 Coupe :

Phil has said this before and I'll repeat it for the sake of discussion. Attached flow is not the goal! The pressure at the front of a car is great enough to attach flow almost no matter the shape. In fact, if you show me a car without attached flow on the front panel I'll send you a nice drawing of your car.

Anyway. Reducing drag is the goal. Air will most likely prefer a nice, rounded front to a block front. And keep in mind that when you compare it to the EV1, you compare it to a stock car without the giant air dam or gap taping.

That's not to say a car with a flat front can't yield good numbers- the Camaro disproves that- but a smooth transition is preferable.

Carry on!
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
Cd (12-11-2011)
Old 11-21-2011, 02:01 PM   #39 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
People continue to fixate on the front when the top of the windshield on back is where it's at.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Cd (12-11-2011), PaleMelanesian (11-22-2011), slowmover (12-28-2011)
Old 11-21-2011, 02:51 PM   #40 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,183
Thanks: 128
Thanked 2,804 Times in 1,969 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quasimoto View Post
While this is for the nose of a streamliner; it is still quite interesting.

http://www.aussieinvader.com/wp-cont..._design_dm.pdf
Very interesting.

Looks like you have a choice of safe and slow, or fast and air-born.

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com