Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-27-2014, 12:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
Liberty Lover
 
j12piprius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: central california
Posts: 587

pris prius - '12 Toyota plug in prius
90 day: 71.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 83 Times in 60 Posts
fuel sensor ~ obd2

How difficult would it be to connect the fuel sensor to obd2?

I'm interested to get more accurate fuel tank readings with the ultragauge.

Quote:
As the fuel tank empties, a float drops and slides a moving contact along a resistor, called a potentiometer, increasing its resistance. The dashboard indicator displays the amount of electrical current flowing through the sending unit on a gauge. The potentiometer should read 2-5 ohms when empty and 105-108 when full.


Last edited by j12piprius; 11-27-2014 at 04:20 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-27-2014, 07:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Interesting question. Usually it's the guys with pre-OBD-II vehicles that are looking for more accurate ways to measure fuel used at the tank.

I don't know anything about fiddling with OBD-II. I'd be surprised if you could feed a new sensor into the system and then have the gauge read it though.

But I think you'd be able to buy or make a higher resolution digital gauge easily enough. You'd just have to calibrate it against an actual fill (done in measured increments) for accuracy.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
j12piprius (11-27-2014)
Old 11-27-2014, 08:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Liberty Lover
 
j12piprius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: central california
Posts: 587

pris prius - '12 Toyota plug in prius
90 day: 71.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 83 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I think you'd be able to buy or make a higher resolution digital gauge easily enough. You'd just have to calibrate it against an actual fill (done in measured increments) for accuracy.
That would be good, but shouldn't a new gauge adjust from the sensor in the tank?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 08:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
I assume you'd be going for a display with high resolution (eg. a % readout or 20 "bars" vs analog).

By "calibrate" I mean you could measure exactly how much fuel each bar represents. I don't think the float/resistor gives you a linear progression from full to empty.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 08:17 PM   #5 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
PS: what's your reason for wanting more resolution from your gauge?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 08:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
Liberty Lover
 
j12piprius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: central california
Posts: 587

pris prius - '12 Toyota plug in prius
90 day: 71.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 83 Times in 60 Posts
Yes, high resolution.

My reason is for greater accuracy, verification of how many gallons to fill up, and a double check of fill ups from different stations.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 09:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,185

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,216
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
My understanding is that people with lean burn install an MPGuino.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2014, 01:47 AM   #8 (permalink)
Wanting more for less
 
D.O.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 313

Metric - '94 Honda Magna 250
Motorcycle
90 day: 69.83 mpg (US)

RedCelica - '94 Toyota Celica ZR
90 day: 35.97 mpg (US)

i30 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)

i30-22 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts
Most float type fuel tank level sensors aren't designed to be super accurate, so it throws out whatever display you use.

In a typical rectangular tank, climbing/descending a hill, cornering, road camber, how warm/cold the fuel in the tank is and probably lots of other outside influences will effect the displayed fuel level.
Some type of damping device is usually used to smooth out the reading, but they aren't perfect and will give false readings at times.

An MPGuino is pretty accurate, but even that ignores variations in fuel pressure and temperature, dirty or worn injectors, fuel leaks, etc.

This is why most guys recommend only filling from one particular pump at one particular petrol station at a regular time of day. Even then, there are just too many variables to rely on one tank's result, you have to average results over time.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to D.O.G. For This Useful Post:
j12piprius (11-28-2014)
Old 11-28-2014, 01:56 AM   #9 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
I think the fuel level sensor will already be reading its maximum value after filling at a pump that turns off a bit early, so the exact sensor reading won't help to determine how complete of a fill you are truly getting
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2014, 06:02 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
I too would love an accurate fuel gauge.

At it's simplest, you can simply connect a voltmeter to the factory gauge, X volts means full, Y volts means empty. You could use an Arduino to translate this to actual litres/gallons.

However, as stated already, this would be of limited value as there's still fuel in the tank when the sender reads zero and you can always fill past full.

I've often thought about adding a camera inside the tank for visual confirmation, you could even add a tide stick inside with markings. Only way I can think of to have complete accuracy.

I once nearly ran out of fuel because I put too much faith in my MPGuino, luckily I was at the top of a hill when it began to sputter, and there was a petrol station at the bottom.

__________________






  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com