Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-03-2010, 10:11 PM   #41 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
Yep, and it still maths out as I mentioned. Though a Prius or an Insight is more like 30-40% efficient.
Max efficiency is around 36% but again in the real world it normally isn't at that level 28% or so is much more common on a normal mixed driving cycle and that is because of the Atkins' cycle.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-04-2010, 04:17 AM   #42 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 69

EcoSentra - '04 Nissan Sentra
90 day: 35.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
Actually, if EV adoption goes too smoothly, there goes the gas price crunch which I'm hoping will awaken the masses to the importance of good energy policy. I really hope we never see a cheap, coal-fired SUV, but it looks like it's on the way.
I suspect that the adoption of EV or PHEV will be slow enough that we will manage to hit $5/gallon in US and $10/gallon in the rest of the world in the next couple of years.

Don't be so fixated on coal. Almost all new power plants in the US are Nat Gas and combined cycle Nat Gas plants can be ~60% efficient, though that's still a fossil fuel. Once we get over the fear of nuclear the grid will get even cleaner. Plus the emissions from electricity generation from coal can be cleaned up by using oil producing algae to clean the CO2, then the oil produced by the algae is used to make biodiesel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 04:30 AM   #43 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 69

EcoSentra - '04 Nissan Sentra
90 day: 35.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
Even accounting for the inputs of refining and distribution, I arrived at 16KWh = 1gal in terms of CO2.
Is that CO2 production to produce 16kWhr is equal to produce 1 gallon of gas, well to wheels?

Seems reasonable and means that EVs still come out on top with regards to efficiency and minimal environmental impact, but that shouldn't be a surprise because even studies funded by the oil industry have to admit that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 07:57 AM   #44 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 04_Sentra View Post
Is that CO2 production to produce 16kWhr is equal to produce 1 gallon of gas, well to wheels?
Yes.

If you'd like to know why coal keeps coming up, see post two of that thread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 10:50 AM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The Prius engine is 38% *peak* efficiency. The Edison2 VLC is 34% *peak* efficiency. On average (after warming up!) most internal combustion engines are 18-20% while they are moving the vehicle. If they have stop/start, they save 5-8% overall, but while idling and sitting still they are 0% efficient.

The worst coal plants are 30-35%, and the newer ones are ~45%. Gas fired electrical plants are ~60%. And hydro, wind, solar, wave, tidal, geothermal use no fuel, so by this measure, they are 100% efficient. Grid losses are about 7.5%.

Gasoline "contains" both electricity and natural gas, and the electricity "in" gasoline contains coal, natural gas, nuclear, and some additional oil. All of this additional energy adds to the carbon footprint of using the gasoline:

*Since it takes years to find oil fields, with lots of scientific methods and computer modeling, etc. Many exploratory rigs fail to find oil.

* and years build the rigs

* lots of energy to move these giant rigs into place -- it takes months to "sail" them

* and lots of energy to make the materials used (like drilling mud which is very energy intensive)

* and lots of power to drill for months (which adds all the carbon used to make it)

* energy to transport workers and equipment back and forth to the oil rig

* and then more electricity to extract the oil (which adds all the carbon used to make the electricity)

* and then more energy to transport it in tankers and/or pipelines (each of which have to be constructed and maintained)

* and then the oil has to be pumped into storage tanks (which have to be built and maintained)

* and then pumped again to be transported to refineries (which have to be built and maintained)

* then it has to be heated and distilled for days (requiring as much electricity as a city of 250,000 -- and many therms of natural gas, too; which has a similar process to oil except the refinement)

* scrub the emissions from the refinery

* and then be pumped into storage tanks (which have to be built and maintained)

* and the additives need to be made (ethanol is a whole nightmarish feedback loop in itself! Natural gas is used to make the fertilizer for the corn -- corn is very fertilizer intensive crop, lots of chemicals need to be manufactured, and the tractors run on diesel, and it has to be transported to a it's own refinery -- and "cooked" and distilled...)

*pumped again and transported by truck, or trains, or pipelines (which also have to be built and maintained)

*pumped again into storage tanks at each gas station (which have to be built, installed and maintained)

*and finally, the gasoline has to be pumped into a vehicle's tank.

ALL OF THE ENERGY USED along the way from find the oil, through the myriad steps until it is in your vehicle's tank MUST BE accounted for in the carbon footprint of gasoline.

**** Now, if we add military spending and foreign policy that are largely driven by the need to maintain a secure and stable supply of oil, then the equation becomes overwhelmingly in favor of electricity.

--------------

The process for coal is far simpler:

* Find the coal deposits

* Mine the coal, (requiring the equipment to be built and maintained)

* Transport it on trains (which is the most efficient way to move anything)

* Store it in big piles, and move it around to keep it from igniting because of the pressure (requiring equipment to be built and maintained)

* Burn it to generate power (requiring the plant to be built and maintained)

* Scrub the emissions

* Store the fly ash safely

* and transmit it over the grid (requiring it to be built and maintained)

--------------

Oil requires (at least) 18 steps that use energy, vs 8 steps for coal.



Oil is finite, and electricity is virtually infinite.
Oil is all carbon, and electricity is potentially carbon-free.

Then, an ICE powered vehicle is 18-20% efficient vs ~85% efficient EV's.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 11-04-2010 at 10:59 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 11:35 AM   #46 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 04_Sentra View Post
Once we get over the fear of nuclear the grid will get even cleaner.
Weird thinking.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to euromodder For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (11-04-2010), UFO (11-04-2010)
Old 11-04-2010, 07:41 PM   #47 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
@Neil: I've given you well to wheels analysis. All you have is FUD. I could write a paper, fit to publish, on this topic, and it wouldn't sway you in the least, because some activist journalist telling you what you want to hear came to different conclusions.

We could argue 'til we're blue in the face about peak engine efficiency vs cycle efficiency, for hypermilers versus normies. But there's no need to. Engine/motor efficiency is already rolled in to mpg and Wh/mi, so just compare those on a car-by-car basis, using the best analysis techniques available, which indicate that somewhere around 16KWh equates to 1 gal by most metrics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Oil is all carbon
Neil, you are a person who brings out the worst in me. I despise your emotion-driven, anecdote-ridden argumentative style and your religious obsessions about seemingly arbitrarily chosen technologies. Do not mistake my further silence for acquiescence.

Hehe. I do appreciate irony though. I think I may be an anti-zeal zealot.

@04Sentra: I agree, nuclear is a great way to reduce the carbon intensity of the grid and provide an affordable way to displace fossil fuel consumption.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 10:16 PM   #48 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 69

EcoSentra - '04 Nissan Sentra
90 day: 35.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
Yes.

If you'd like to know why coal keeps coming up, see post two of that thread.
I understand that the biggest share of electricity generation is from coal but that is on the decrease. I think that we can green the grid and the transportation sector in parallel...at least I hope that we can for the sake of the planet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 10:44 PM   #49 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 69

EcoSentra - '04 Nissan Sentra
90 day: 35.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Weird thinking.
Nuclear doesn't produce climate changing emissions. The waste is dangerous but it is stored not released into the environment, so for providing base load to the grid IMHO nuke is preferable to coal.

Don't get me wrong I'm not pro-nuke, I'm pro-efficiency and solar, but in the short term increased use of nuclear can green the grid until production capacity from renewables (wind, solar, etc.) can catch up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 11:03 PM   #50 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262

Bus - '94 Ford School Bus huge

Stupid - '01 Chevy Blazer LS
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)

hawk - '00 Honda Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Just a quick stab at wind, hydro, and others, how do they lubricate these machines? How much oil consumption is there for the gearboxes and bearings?

I dont know, but they are not 100% free of oil.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nissan drive by wire throttle skyl4rk EcoModding Central 2 11-06-2009 01:05 PM
Smart Fortwo test drive: what do YOU want to know? SVOboy EcoModding Central 14 05-18-2009 09:53 PM
LA Auto Show: Mitsubishi i MiEV Test Drive SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 0 11-21-2008 09:10 PM
Video: (definitely worth checking) test drive of Aptera @ Popular Mechanics MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 30 10-20-2008 10:11 PM
Video: Porsche 914 home conversion (show & test drive) MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 13 01-23-2008 01:29 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com