06-30-2015, 08:43 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Future fodder for foolishness: bug splatter-shedding paint improves fuel economy!
Photo: Tamsin Slater
Actually, it's true! But for aeronautic applications...
Quote:
NASA scientists are now developing coatings that help aircraft shed or repel bug guts during flight. After screening nearly 200 different coating formulations [...] it has created a coating that could reduce the amount of insect insides stuck to the wings by up to 40%.
With further optimization, such coatings could allow planes to use 5% less fuel
|
Source:
Airplane Coatings Help Recoup Fuel Efficiency Lost To Bug Splatter
NASA’s insect-shedding surfaces reduce drag by keeping plane wings cleaner in flight
Airplane Coatings Help Recoup Fuel Efficiency Lost To Bug Splatter | June 29, 2015 Issue - Vol. 93 Issue 26 | Chemical & Engineering News
Countdown until this shows up on a car forum as a fuel economy mod?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 09:02 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 447
Thanks: 277
Thanked 231 Times in 105 Posts
|
That's pretty cool. I'm sure it would help for automotive vehicles... traveling at the same speeds... 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to whatmaycome14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 10:12 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
MPGuts-be-gone!
For all your driving out of cargo planes fuel efficiency concerns.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-01-2015, 07:29 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 90
Thanked 95 Times in 79 Posts
|
I'm not even going to read the article- just popped in to award an A for artistic alliteration in the post title-I approve very much
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/
US MPG for my Renault Clio 182
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2015, 07:35 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,248 Times in 1,456 Posts
|
Why, to lose all those dimply tripstrip like little vortex generators? 
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
  lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2015, 07:36 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 114
Thanks: 47
Thanked 96 Times in 34 Posts
|
I think this falls in the splitting hair.. uh bugs catagory
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2015, 09:28 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
But I already use Rain-X...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2015, 09:32 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
I live about 20 miles from NASA Langley and find it astounding that NASA needs to spend my tax money when the Paint manufacturers should be doing this, without my tax money. 
It just shows how insignificant they have become, a bunch of old farts like me riding their retirement plans to 80% (40 years).
They could help me with my idea instead of waxing and polishing a wings leading edge. Wonder how many billions they flush down the toilet on this?
I should not even read this thread and make my blood pressure spike, but then I guess you could call it a stroke test.
regards
mech |
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-01-2015, 09:39 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
With sufficient space to run up I suppose my car could cruise at 100+, but any efficiency gained would, of course, be lost to the speed demon.
Attempting such in the truck would necessitate paint that could shed bits of piston and crankshaft. The 22R is a dogged and relentless mill, but it is NOT happy at high revs.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2015, 02:19 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
A friend once told me that washing the bug splats off his airplane was good for about 2 MPH. His normal cruise speed was around 200 MPH.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
|
|
