02-12-2009, 09:48 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sheffield UK
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Grill Block question?
I am planning on doing a grill block to my crx.
Mine has the later ( vtec ) front end.
Aswell as installing a lower front lip, i am thinking of blocking one or two of the grills.
I think ill go for the larger bottom one first.
However , as it is the vtec model, i don't want it to be noticeable ie : to detract from the sporty looks .
A lot of people put coroplast ( or similar blocking material ) infront of the grill , right? To me this seems like the easier and most likely more efficient way to do it obvious.... However it may spoil the looks ( in my eyes )
So i was wondering if it would be worthwhile to block it from behind? So from the outside it looks like it has a functional grill .... but in reality it no longer does.
Im trying to work out whether the mouth of the opening will act more like a parachute ( higher pressure zone ).
Like imagine the lid of an aerosol being pushed ( open end ) forwards through the air..... Its going to be acting like a parachute, as the air inside cannot flow out the back.
Opinions ?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 10:15 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Ex-lurker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersey
Posts: 571
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
|
Either way will work. I'm guessing there will still be some aero drag if it's blocked behind the grill instead of in front, but significantly less than if left open. Try it both ways with some scrap cardboard first and decide which one works/looks better for you.
__________________
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 11:44 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
I'd start from the top down for aerodynamics. If you're after faster warmups, any blocking will help, top / bottom / front / back.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
02-18-2009, 07:52 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,312
Thanks: 24,439
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
|
parachute
I would not be concerned about a parachute effect.The leading-edge radii away from the grille area will prevent any flow separation.You will have a bubble of stagnant air in front of the blocked area but it won't really compromise drag.-------------------- I would recommend that you do a temporary block and first make sure you don't overheat.I never blocked either the upper or lower openings but rather had a nose with internal ducting which limited the "grill" opening,but once past there,the air was free to enter the original grill openings behind the new nose,both upper and lower.------------------------ The only time she ran hot was at wide-open-throttle for six miles during one summer.
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 05:14 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_am_socket
Either way will work. I'm guessing there will still be some aero drag if it's blocked behind the grill instead of in front, but significantly less than if left open. Try it both ways with some scrap cardboard first and decide which one works/looks better for you.
|
The drag comes from the shape of the grill's effect on the airstream, not air going in, so I don't see the point in those rear blocks
The other thing I don't understand is when people block the lower grill but not the upper. Even if you get smooth flow from the bottom one, going up the air will hit the top grill like it's a parachute-- even more so because it's higher pressure and faster air.
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 05:40 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,312
Thanks: 24,439
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
|
drag
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis
The drag comes from the shape of the grill's effect on the airstream, not air going in, so I don't see the point in those rear blocks
The other thing I don't understand is when people block the lower grill but not the upper. Even if you get smooth flow from the bottom one, going up the air will hit the top grill like it's a parachute-- even more so because it's higher pressure and faster air.
|
Actually the drag is caused by the air going through the cooling system and the tortuous path through the engine bay on its way out.
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 03:12 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
Actually the drag is caused by the air going through the cooling system and the tortuous path through the engine bay on its way out.
|
The only drag that matters is the resistance the air encounters going in. It doesn't matter what the path is inside, except the effect on the resistance to inflow. A grill block has 100% resistance to inflow, but if it's angled the flow over the top of it will be much easier.
Do a thought experiment-- picture a powerful fan pulling air through the engine bay. Of course it's not going to increase drag, regardless of how much turbulence and resistance there is inside. All that matters is the force exerted on the airflow outside the car.
The difference between a rear block and the engine bay's aerodynamics are that one pushes 100% of the air back out, and the other pushes some fraction back out.
Last edited by winkosmosis; 02-22-2009 at 03:25 AM..
|
|
|
03-09-2009, 08:07 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis
The only drag that matters is the resistance the air encounters going in.
|
Since after passing through the radiator, cooling air generally exits in a turbulent fashion to the aerodynamically dirty underside of a vehicle, that should be taken into consideration too.
Which is why it makes sense that blocking grille openings above the stagnation point has the dual benefit of reducing cooling drag and diverting that airflow to the relatively smooth top & sides of the vehicle, vs. underneath.
|
|
|
03-10-2009, 12:11 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
Hi,
I would try blocking the upper grill first -- this will help lower the stagnant point, which is a good thing. Also, the early indications are that I am getting slightly better cooling with only a lower opening; despite the smaller total open area. (I also have a large portion of the outer parts of the lower grill blocked.)
|
|
|
03-10-2009, 12:36 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis
The only drag that matters is the resistance the air encounters going in. It doesn't matter what the path is inside, except the effect on the resistance to inflow. A grill block has 100% resistance to inflow, but if it's angled the flow over the top of it will be much easier.
Do a thought experiment-- picture a powerful fan pulling air through the engine bay. Of course it's not going to increase drag, regardless of how much turbulence and resistance there is inside. All that matters is the force exerted on the airflow outside the car.
The difference between a rear block and the engine bay's aerodynamics are that one pushes 100% of the air back out, and the other pushes some fraction back out.
|
Credentials? Backing data?
|
|
|
|