Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2013, 12:38 PM   #21 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
Electric fans just shift the exact same burden to the electrical system. Are you willing to put it to a higher strain? Might gain a little in solo driving, but the question always exists as to whether an aftermarket set of e-fans is capable of the same duty rating as the mechanical fan.
No, they don't shift the exact same burden. The mechanical fans, even clutched or flex, are always spinning thus are always a parasitic loss especially at above idle rpms.

In my experience (several years with NO fan in the F150, including towing) the only time the fan is needed is when the vehicle is going too slowly to move air past the radiator- for example waiting at stoplights or extended parking lot maneuvering- even moreso if the A/C is on. I do completely remove my winter front when it's warmer out.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-04-2013, 12:47 PM   #22 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
"Modern" mechanical fans can have electromagnetic clutches (if we misunderstnad each other here). The "free wheel" is different.

The amperage draw for an electrically-driven pair of fans to cool a hard-working 1T truck radiator is huge. A bigger alternator is called for (and the re-size has to have a load reserve margin increse as well). 140A to 220A would be about right, assuming one can find an ambulance-package factory alternator.

Even with an older style mechanical clutch the trade-off may not be worthwhile. The HP draw may be similar, and one is hard-loadng the electrical to do it.

.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2013, 01:18 PM   #23 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Admittedly my experience is with a 1/2 ton with a 302, and my car. Still, I wouldn't expect a cooling fan to need to work hard, if at all, when the vehicle is moving. I've adapted to the fan delete by being more careful to avoid hot stationary idling. That might be a bit much for campground maneuvering but I'd be surprised if an e-fan couldn't handle it w/o any alternator upgrades.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-04-2013 at 01:23 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 09:54 PM   #24 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Admittedly my experience is with a 1/2 ton with a 302, and my car. Still, I wouldn't expect a cooling fan to need to work hard, if at all, when the vehicle is moving. I've adapted to the fan delete by being more careful to avoid hot stationary idling. That might be a bit much for campground maneuvering but I'd be surprised if an e-fan couldn't handle it w/o any alternator upgrades.
I agree with your statements on this question from a lifetime of experience with V8's. But things are different since the Big Three finally replaced motors designed in the 1950's and 1960's by before 2005.

I have not owned a 1/2T of the "modern" era and can't speak to them specifically, either.

I would add to it that the heat rejection load needed in the southern US is not to be trifled with. I take it that if one has a 1/2T one needs one (eventually, towing & payload; my agreements with your sentiments on soccer daddies notwithstanding). Thus I would search out someone who has an aftermarket electric fan kit and has put thousands of miles of HD usage on it -- climate, terrain and use similar to ones own -- before considering buying one. An automatic tramsmission makes this, IMO, mandatory. Add A/C to that in stop/go traffic . . . .

HD fan use is limited over the percentage of miles of the vehicle. But the use itself may be from 1/2-hr to a couple of hours at a time. Nothing I'd be willing to trifle with no matter the engine type or vehicle spec or brand.

I'd imagine a retrofit to an older vehcle of a truck-specific fan/shroud/electrical package may be a good one for someone somewhere at some time.

.

Last edited by slowmover; 06-05-2013 at 09:59 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 10:03 PM   #25 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I've read that Taurus fans are pretty strong; if I ever put an e-fan on the F150 it'll probably be one of those... mainly because I already have them sitting in my spare parts stash.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 01:53 AM   #26 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I wouldn't expect a cooling fan to need to work hard, if at all, when the vehicle is moving. I've adapted to the fan delete by being more careful to avoid hot stationary idling.
No wonder many motorcycles don't have fans. Well, avoiding idling at all increases fuel savings
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 01:59 AM   #27 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Well... not that I do much of any idling anyway; I should have said low speed operations.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 02:07 AM   #28 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I should have said low speed operations.
That's a critical condition for overheating, no wonder I see more cars overheating in a traffic jam than in an open road
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 04:31 PM   #29 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,525 Times in 2,799 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
In my experience (several years with NO fan in the F150, including towing) the only time the fan is needed is when the vehicle is going too slowly to move air past the radiator- for example waiting at stoplights or extended parking lot maneuvering- even moreso if the A/C is on. I do completely remove my winter front when it's warmer out.
This is what I have found too.
(I don't have A/C and cant comment on its use)
The Fans stay off about 99% of the time when vehicle speed is below 35mph and stay off all the time above 35mph.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 10:26 AM   #30 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
This is what I have found too.
(I don't have A/C and cant comment on its use)
The Fans stay off about 99% of the time when vehicle speed is below 35mph and stay off all the time above 35mph.
Except when pulling a grade heavily-loaded or towiing. Putting the truck to work as designed. Higher rpms and throttle fully open will find any weaknesses in the cooling system. Might be at WOT in 2nd, 3rd or other than top gear for 20-minutes or longer.

The engine fan (shroud, etc) had better be up to snuff. The hotter the weather, the worse it is.

But it is NOT hot weather only. The need to shed heat rapidly can surprise you on some cooler days.

.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (06-14-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com