Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2022, 04:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 14
Thanks: 5
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Hello from South Bucks

Hi, my name is Oliver and I'm a professional electronics design engineer. That pays the bills, but at heart I'm something of a petrol head. For me, that doesn't mean loud exhausts and license losing power but efficiency.

I've got a Caterham 7 that I built 33 years ago, and it's pretty close to a truly minimal car. Over the years it's gone from 130 BHP and 25 MPG to 155 BHP and 33 MPG, with plans for more improvements.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OliverSedlacek For This Useful Post:
Gasoline Fumes (07-08-2022)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-07-2022, 07:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,698
Thanks: 7,776
Thanked 8,585 Times in 7,069 Posts
Welcome. This South Bucks? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Bucks

Which was more difficult, 130-155 HP or 25-33 MPG?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 01:25 AM   #3 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
What engine does the Caterham have?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 01:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 14
Thanks: 5
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Yes, that south bucks.
The Caterham has a Ford crossflow 1700cc pushrod engine, so originally 1960s design. I didn't really set myself power or MPG goals, so I can't say either was more difficult. The main goal was a genuine 300 BHP per ton, so I'm pretty pleased with getting 310 BHP per ton. I'm at 91 BHP per liter, and to go more than that gets really expensive. For those of you on facebook you can see more at facebook.com/CaterhamX300. For those not on facebook I'll post stuff here.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OliverSedlacek For This Useful Post:
freebeard (07-08-2022)
Old 07-08-2022, 02:39 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,698
Thanks: 7,776
Thanked 8,585 Times in 7,069 Posts
Quote:
For those not on facebook I'll post stuff here.
Thank you for that.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2022, 04:41 PM   #6 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverSedlacek View Post
The Caterham has a Ford crossflow 1700cc pushrod engine, so originally 1960s design.
I actually like some seemingly "obsolete" engine designs. Even some sidevalve engines catch my attention once in a while...


Quote:
I didn't really set myself power or MPG goals, so I can't say either was more difficult. The main goal was a genuine 300 BHP per ton, so I'm pretty pleased with getting 310 BHP per ton. I'm at 91 BHP per liter, and to go more than that gets really expensive.
No need to make much effort with such a featherweight ride anyway...
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 04:37 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 14
Thanks: 5
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
When is something no onger obsolete?

I did consider doing a bike engine swap some years ago, which would then be all 16V DOHC territory.
For road work I rarely trouble 5000 RPM+ territory, so pushrods work fine. With throttle bodies and an ECU, the oldest part of the engine by design is the 2 valve 'chamber in piston' design, which to be fair isn't clean burning.
Modern forged pistons gave a huge improvement in performance and fuel economy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2022, 09:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverSedlacek View Post
I did consider doing a bike engine swap some years ago, which would then be all 16V DOHC territory.
Unless you could find a 2-stroke
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2023, 09:28 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: Davie
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I need some help.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2023, 12:49 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,698
Thanks: 7,776
Thanked 8,585 Times in 7,069 Posts
A year-old thread may not be the best place to ask.

Specifics?

__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com