Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2015, 04:52 PM   #31 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
You could have a pto shaft off of the front of the engine to drive the wheels mechanically on the fast areas, and 35hp would get you 30mph easily. I'd use a high output MX bike engine, say a YZ 450 4 stroke, 50HP, 8500 to 11,000rpm. Less than 100 lbs.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	images-3.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	6.2 KB
ID:	18795  
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-25-2015, 06:12 PM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
well a high rpm motor will only have more losses on the conversion to torqe.

and the hydraulic motors are basically turning all the time, bolted straight to the wheel, so lots of fluid moving around going nowhere at 30mph.

I like hydraulic, as seen on construction equipment and other crawlers (like that thing that moves rockets at 1/3 a mile/hour) but it loses if you want hydraulic energy storage.

An electric motor controller that can monitor current/temperature/etc and minimize breakage isn't that hard to conceive (and liquid cooling can help). But there are lots of design limitations and compromises in that direction as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 07:09 PM   #33 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
These are very high efficiency engines withe the torque curve remaining virtually flat from 5000-10000 rpm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 07:44 PM   #34 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
Smaller engines aren't usually terribly efficient, but there are atv sized rock-crawlers, but how does the hybrid part play along without being the worst of both worlds?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 12:21 AM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
well this isn't exactly what was described, but an interesting machine anyway, electric drive 4x10hp (peak 200hp total), some large honda generator looking thing, wheelbase can be lengthened/shortened/widened/narrowed/raised/lowered hydraulically. And can go pretty fast, for a little bit.

But it doesn't have much storage, aside from the fuel tank "batteries give it corvette power for 5 seconds". So technically a hybrid (as counting the winch as a hybrid didn't seem to get much traction).

also didn't see any vids of it climbing, mostly dancing around in the parking lot, so nothing conclusive about it performance wise. It might be so expensive he is afraid to climb with it, or it breaks easily, or too heavy with batteries or not geared right for climbing or? But I would think there would be some real climbing vids if it were that good, rather than leave it to your imagination.

green rock dawg
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to P-hack For This Useful Post:
CFECO (09-26-2015)
Old 09-26-2015, 12:26 AM   #36 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
"Efficient", by what metric, HP/CID... In the past a Cox .049 2 cycle won that one hands down, today I don't know. These MC race engines are pretty good for what they are designed for, we now have 4 stroke motors beating two strokes in the same class, and P/W is King!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 12:33 AM   #37 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
Wow, there you go! That looks like the I believe V8 powered machine that each wheel is on an arm which can be pivoted up or down, chain drive as I remember. Articulation is Crazy!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 12:34 AM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
efficient when discussing an engine can surely be assumed to mean bsfc(well, around here anyway). power to weight can play a role in system efficiency, esp in a vehicle, but an engine by itself cannot go anywhere. The smaller the engine the worse it is at turning fuel into horsepower, typically.

edit, pic:

Last edited by P-hack; 09-26-2015 at 12:40 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 12:41 AM   #39 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
Here it is in action, way to buisy keeping everything adjusted, more of a can I do it kind of thing. I could see hitting a lever the wrong way and flipping it on its lid.

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 12:50 AM   #40 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack View Post
efficient when discussing an engine can surely be assumed to mean bsfc(well, around here anyway). power to weight can play a role in system efficiency, esp in a vehicle, but an engine by itself cannot go anywhere. The smaller the engine the worse it is at turning fuel into horsepower, typically.
Don't forget extra friction losses due to high RPM. Not to mention I would need at least one extra gear box to convert RPM based horsepower to torque, and I am already geared higher than I like with an engine that can chug along at 500 RPM.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com