Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-27-2015, 03:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Henning (2014 VW Passat, 1.6 TDI Bluemotion)

Replacement for Hermann has arrived.

Henning.



It is a Passat, 1.6 TDI Bluemotion - the FE biased version. We still need something bigg-ish and dog friendly (low loading sill) so this seems to fit quite well.

Official stats are urban 53.3 mpg, extra urban mpg 70.6 mpg and overall 64.2 mpg. It also only cost £30 a year to tax vs. £475 for Hermann so I'm about 5 tanks of Diesel ahead already. Insurance (also annual) is £18 less.

Not planning much, if any, moddage to it except for higher tyre pressures and to see what techniques work best. In terms of FE mods the grill isn't blocked much (unlike the Polo Bluemotion) but it has (supposedly, will need to check what is on it) LRR tyres and slightly lowered suspension. Main feature is stop-start which works really well combined with hill-hold. It is also a manual 6 Speed.

It will be interesting to compare with Mrs A's Skoda Octavia estate which has the same engine but the 7 speed DSG.

So far using the built in display it has managed 48 and 55 MPG in fairly heavy traffic on two short trips - one to collect it and one to fill up.

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Arragonis For This Useful Post:
MobilOne (04-28-2015), niky (04-29-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-27-2015, 03:47 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
I wish we could get the 1.6L TDI on this side of the pond.
__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2015, 03:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Nice upgrade.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Arragonis (04-27-2015)
Old 04-27-2015, 04:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Why the huge difference in tax, age?

regards
mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2015, 04:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonG View Post
I wish we could get the 1.6L TDI on this side of the pond.
I can't see why it couldn't be sold there if the other TDIs make it but we end up in that debate about demand and why Americans are needing vastly more power than everyone else - EDIT - the 1.6 has "only" 105hp and does 0-60 in "only" 12-13 seconds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Why the huge difference in tax, age?

regards
mech
UK car tax (meant to pay for roads and maintenance but is really used as general taxation) is based on CO2 emission "bands". The Audi fell into the 2nd or 3rd highest. If I had bought one a year younger is was "only" £275, even if I had a 3.0 instead of my 2.7.

This is a Carbon tax for real, and one even I support even if I did have to pay it. If reducing CO2 is your big deal then this is how to do it effectively as it also means makers want their cars to be in the lower 3 bands which go from £0 - £30. This is a win-win as emissions go down and consumers save. Except uk.gov likes taxes so they have pondered taxing us by usage instead.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]

Last edited by Arragonis; 04-27-2015 at 04:39 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2015, 04:45 PM   #6 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
P.S. The source of Henning. EDIT Some mild swearing.

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2015, 04:54 PM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Looks nice.

UK or US mpg stated?

I don't suppose those roof rails will easily come off from the outside.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2015, 05:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Maybe a bit of coroplast fairing.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2015, 06:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Looks nice.

UK or US mpg stated?

I don't suppose those roof rails will easily come off from the outside.
All MPGs are imperial.

Not planning on removing the bars at the moment.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2015, 09:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
Spaced out...
 
spacemanspif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 748

The New Focus - '07 Ford Focus ZX5
90 day: 32.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 205 Times in 149 Posts
Nice grab. Is it a turbo diesel? I didn't think turbos and lots of on/off made for a good match; wondering how VW handled that possible issue...

__________________
-Mike

2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014

Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to spacemanspif For This Useful Post:
MobilOne (05-05-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com