View Poll Results: What grade of fuel do you use (octane)?
|
Regular 87
|
|
24 |
63.16% |
89
|
|
4 |
10.53% |
91
|
|
7 |
18.42% |
93
|
|
3 |
7.89% |
03-06-2012, 04:14 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 712
Thanks: 153
Thanked 272 Times in 166 Posts
|
I have always used the octane recommended in my car's manual (87) even if the engine has a rather high Compression Ratio (10.5:1). Modern ECU/ECM can easily manage lower octane with higher compression engines by adjusting the timing accordingly, to a certain extent. I might try 89 (E5) or 91 (E0) octane gas this summer and see if the ECM can advance the timing on its own for increased efficiency.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 06:32 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salt Lake valley Utah
Posts: 923
Thanks: 114
Thanked 397 Times in 224 Posts
|
A while back i put in a tank of 93 instead of 87. Driving on premium is alot more fun! I would that was a noticeable difference.
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:36 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
|
If you're able to fiddle with valve timing, I'm pretty sure you can use the valve timing to limit power at low rpm and use lower octane gas on a high compression engine, since variable cam phasing systems typically advance the cam to increase power at the expense of greater detonation risk (hence, high octane gas to compensate), and maintain the same spark timing and therefore not lose economy.
|
|
|
03-12-2012, 06:51 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Wanting more for less
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 313
Thanks: 23
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts
|
I think it varies too much car to car to predict.
"BoB" used to see no difference between 91RON E0 or 91RON E10 and about 6% better FE on 95RON E0 (at 8-10% higher cost).
"Baa" gets better FE on E0 91RON than the other two.
(The recommended fuel for each car is 91RON E0).
I'd suggest you run a few tanks of each and work out cost per mile for your vehicle and driving conditions.
|
|
|
03-15-2012, 03:15 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
mcrews -
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews
...
Whoever in othere threads (ignoring the ethonl) going up to 91 from a car that is supposed to run 87 didnt help.
But I think mort might be onto something in his post.
|
I've been using 91 but I am switching to 87 right now to save $ and to see what happens in the next few tanks.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 02:09 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews
I have done several 'tests' while taking my trips to Texas from CA.
My car is one of those that says '91'.
It does make a difference in mpg if I drop down. according to the scangauge, the ign advance drops down.
Whoever in othere threads (ignoring the ethonl) going up to 91 from a car that is supposed to run 87 didnt help.
But I think mort might be onto something in his post.
|
Yeah, I marked 91. My car requires premium, and unfortunately, 93 isn't an option in CA.
__________________
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 10:07 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
The Bobsled wants 91, so it gets whatever is available over 89. Sometimes that's 91, sometimes it's 93. My last car, the Flying ****box (96 Esteem sedan), specified 87 but was a little peppier on 91 so it got that sometimes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 10:08 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
I hadn't known that we had censorware here.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 10:24 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 296
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
|
We have 85, 87 and 91 as the standard octanes at 5000 feet altitude.
I use 88 octane pure gas at one of the ma-pa gas stations. The Corvette dealership here also uses that 88 pure gas to fill up their new Corvettes.
|
|
|
03-16-2012, 10:17 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
I was going to give a big thumbs up to the 89 octane pure gas I got 3 weeks ago. I sold my car two weeks ago and have been riding the bikes exclusively.
The fuel mileage on both bikes went up considerably, but we also have had extremely warm weather here with temps in the 80s last two days, an new record yesterday.
It would be hard to give any exact amount but the increase was in the neighborhood of 10%. I should get my 2011 Fiesta next week, the DMV is dragging their arse again, even though it is costing them hundreds of dollars in taxes.
But then their procrastination has meant I used 10 gallons of gas to cover 733 miles. The weather has been most cooperative.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
|