View Poll Results: What grade of fuel do you use (octane)?
|
Regular 87
|
|
24 |
63.16% |
89
|
|
4 |
10.53% |
91
|
|
7 |
18.42% |
93
|
|
3 |
7.89% |
03-06-2012, 10:54 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 57
Thanks: 15
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
High Octane Fuel
Here in Montreal we have 3 grades of gas: 87, 89 and 91 octane.
I noticed that the pump says that 87 and 89 "may contain up to 10% ethanol" but there is no such label on 91.
While I heard that higher octane might not give a boost in FE, I was wondering, would there be any advantage of driving on 91 (E0) rather than 87 (E10)?
Thursdays, the difference between 87 and 91 is only 11.4 cents/gallon rather than 22.8. Do you think it's worth it? (keeping in mind gas here is about $5.14/gallon)
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 11:18 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
|
The only advantage is if your engine is tuned to run on higher octane, or if your engine is experiencing knock due to timing while running a lower rated gas.
__________________
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 11:34 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
Best way to find out is to try it, some people see an increase in mileage when they use pure gasoline and some people don't see a difference.
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 11:35 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...99% of the time, use 87-octane per manual; but (1%) will up it to 91 or 93-octane when heavily-loaded and driving in hilly country (Colorado).
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 11:42 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurcher
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 151
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
|
E10 has about 3% less energy than gasoline, but your price difference is about 2% so I'd say you could save money by buying premium, if it really is pure gasoline. But I bet it isn't. I bet the increased antiknock rating comes from MTBE, which also has less energy than gasoline, but more than ethanol. So you're probably breaking even.
-mort
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mort For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2012, 12:00 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Stick with
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 01:30 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 14
Thanks: 10
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
My '03 Kia Rio's mileage would dip by about 3% MPG when I used 89 instead of 87. So I stopped using anything other than 87 even if a station sold 87 and 89 octanes for the same price. However, I think all of this was before E10 appeared.
__________________
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 01:36 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...yeah, I remember the "good old" premium high-test SUNOCO 260, wish it was still available here in Arizona.
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 03:00 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
...yeah, I remember the "good old" premium high-test SUNOCO 260, wish it was still available here in Arizona.
|
And the T-Rex of the American Interstate. The phrase can't outrun a radio had no meaning when the LEO's had these:
http://assets.hemmings.com/story_ima...00-0.jpg?rev=2
Todays supercars might have more top end, but it's meaningless without the open road of yesteryear.
As to todays cars and fuels, mid-grade seems to work well for the additive package (fewer fuel-related problems on small-engined equipment as the test).
.
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 03:03 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
I have done several 'tests' while taking my trips to Texas from CA.
My car is one of those that says '91'.
It does make a difference in mpg if I drop down. according to the scangauge, the ign advance drops down.
Whoever in othere threads (ignoring the ethonl) going up to 91 from a car that is supposed to run 87 didnt help.
But I think mort might be onto something in his post.
|
|
|
|