Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2008, 07:45 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 87

Brown Bus - '98 GMC Sonoma X-Cab SLS
90 day: 31.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
...and on a metro, the swap would be FAR more straightforward due to the relative simplicity of the car. Especially compared to an insight.

Of course, if you found a metro with a dead slushbox, you could probably get it for nothing and bring it back to life as a manual.

__________________
Meh Truck
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-06-2008, 11:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
Mechanical Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 190

The Truck - '02 Dodge Ram 1500 SLT Sport
90 day: 15.15 mpg (US)

The Van 2 - '06 Honda Odyssey EX
90 day: 22.63 mpg (US)

GoKart - '14 Hyundai Elantra GT base 6MT
90 day: 29.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnmyster View Post
Yup. A rental AWD Compass. Slow as turd. 26 mpg highway.
I recently rented a Caliber 2.0 CVT that was probably the same drive train as the Compass. It wasn't a hot rod but it was adequately quick to feel safe pulling out into traffic. I didn't baby it, but I did do some neutral-coasting (the engine braking programmed into that CVT was WAY too excessive) and tried to modulate throttle to hold no more than 2500 rpm accelerating when I could (without impeding traffic). Mostly highway trip with some small around town while on business. I wasn't able to accurately calculate mileage because the dang rental place let me pick it up with a half tank so I had to return it with a half tank, which is impossible to do. I filled before heading out and topped it up before returning and guesstimating how much fuel it actually used I had to have gotten at least 30mpg.

I found that if you began accelerating in a sane fashion but then decided it wasn't quick enough it was *really* slow to pick up. You could floor it at 30mph and for like 2 seconds the engine wound-out to red line and then the car took off. If you knew you were pulling out in front of a semi and gave it the boot from the get-go that thing would take off in a much more urgent manner. Basically, drive it like a golf cart. It's pretty much the same response (for those who haven't driven golf carts, either the brake or the gas is on the floor at all times unless you want to maintain a steady speed below the governed max speed, at which point the CVT shifts-out and engine rpms drop).

That said, I bet it would still be better with a 5spd. Automotive CVTs do require obscene hydraulic pressure to work and golf cart/snowmobile CVTs use rubber belts that are equally inefficient.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 04:19 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Crono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Victoria
Posts: 70

Pizza Geo - '92 Geo Metro
Last 3: 47.52 mpg (US)

Blazing Glory - '07 Yamaha C3
90 day: 108.96 mpg (US)

The Beast - '86 Pontiac Subird
90 day: 15.6 mpg (US)

Mom's Firefly - '92 Pontiac Firefly
90 day: 35.65 mpg (US)

Noris - '08 Toyota Yaris
90 day: 35.45 mpg (US)

Mirage - '15 Mitsubishi Mirage
90 day: 41.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not a car, but my Yamaha C3 (49cc Scooter) supposedly has a CVT and it seems to be alright. (I think it's more the "rubber band" type) The acceleration is alright, not as good as 2 stroke engines, but the mileage is really awesome - about 95mpg on average, though supposedly I'm supposed to get 115 if I drive 25mph. (Not going to happen) Realized the tires were underinflated recently though, so I might get a bit better mileage. Anyway, at least in a scooter application a CVT seems to be pretty good.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2015, 07:31 PM   #14 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,185

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 318
Thanked 614 Times in 453 Posts
Just curious, if you just put in a complete manual transaxle, shifter, clutch and cables and left out the sensors and the rest of the wiring crap wouldn't you just get a no lean burn insight that doesn't shutoff and have a cel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red View Post
You could, you'd need a few parts which isn't easy to find for an Insight

For starters
ECU
Cluster
Shifter
Shift cables
Trans
Flywheel
Clutch
Trans sensors (5ish or something)
Part of the harness that hooks up to those sensors

And since you'll be swapping in a manual trans ECU might as well hook up the Lean Burn stuff so
LAF sensor
New cats with the right ports
Extra bits of harness

IMO too much work and $$ to be worthwhile unless you have most of the stuff on hand or you could pick up a parts car cheap
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2015, 07:33 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
GoGreenAuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 17

Silver Bullet - '01 Honda Insight Hybrid
Team Honda
90 day: 55.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Don't give up on the CVT. After only 2 years I have my G1 with 150k getting 60-62 max and 56-58 all the time.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2015, 01:19 AM   #16 (permalink)
.
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Berkshires, Massachussetts
Posts: 884

Ruby Sparks - '01 Honda Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 64.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 111
Thanked 361 Times in 201 Posts
There's not much point anymore. The whole purpose is to get leanburn in a cvt (which was only available in foreign models.)

You can make a CVT leanburn now with just a Japanese ecu and a little wiring change and 02 sensor. You can get one for ~ $750 + shipping. So it would be cheaper to do that.

Now would i spend $750 (210 gallons worth of gas) to save 35 gallons of fuel a year?
__________________
I try to be helpful. I'm not an expert.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2015, 09:40 PM   #17 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 406 Times in 311 Posts
If you keep your eye out, Japanese ECU's pop up on eBay for ~200$.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 11:05 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Mayflower, AR
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
You can achieve lean burn on a CVT Insight FYI. I average 65MPG on my CVT insight and would hate to shift constantly.
With MIMA there are CVT owners getting 75MPG+

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reviving a 2000 Honda Insight "beater" Red Hybrids 215 08-10-2017 07:35 PM
Effect of gear oil viscosity on transmission efficiency (Metro owners take note) MetroMPG EcoModding Central 44 12-08-2014 11:22 PM
Auto transmission with the manual shift feature ScottC33 Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 5 06-17-2009 07:32 AM
Opinions: CRX HF, Honda Insight or Keep Suzuki Swift? dunhamjr General Efficiency Discussion 17 06-18-2008 05:14 PM
Honda insight, doing research, interesting trends NoCO2 General Efficiency Discussion 15 05-06-2008 07:36 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com