03-21-2009, 05:27 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Honda Ridgeline MPG vs speed graph: fuel economy with & without cargo trailer
Another one to add to the pile. My brother's 2007 Ridgeline that he uses for his HVAC business:
Note: the '07 Ridgeline is rated by the EPA at:
I'll post the full details later, but it's pretty close to the same conditions & test method as the Corolla speed vs. mpg graph.
The truck has a full hard tonneau, and I inflated the tires to max sidewall.
Edit: here are the raw figures:
Without the trailer:
Code:
W (mpg US) ... E (mpg US) ... Avg
29.2 ... 28.3 ... 28.75
28.0 ... 30.0 ... 29
24.7 ... 27.2 ... 25.95
27.2 ... 29.2 ... 28.2
24.8 ... 26.6 ... 25.7
22.4 ... 24.3 ... 23.35
20.4 ... 21.1 ... 20.75
19.7 ... 21.4 ... 20.55
With the trailer:
Code:
W (mpg US) ... E (mpg US) ... Avg
22.5 ... 25.4 ... 23.95
21.8 ... 24.2 ... 23
17.6 ... 18.9 ... 18.25
12.9 ... 16.7 ... 14.8
Conditions, route & methodology:
Weather conditions: 29 Dec '08, 34 F / 1 C, wind SSE 9 kts, pressure 29.6 in.
Route: 2 lane highway, straight, dry & nearly level
Methodology:
Speed was set once per pair of bi-dir runs with cruise control, cancelled with the brake between runs. Truck was brought up to speed & leveled off before passing a "start" marker (road sign) where the ScanGauge (not calibrated against refuelling) was reset. Reading was taken after passing a "finish" marker and cruise was cancelled.
Traffic conditions: There was no traffic in my lane and very little in the oncoming lane. (More than a few runs were done with me being the only car on that stretch of road.) If anyone caught up & overtook me, or if I caught up to another car, I ditched that run and did it again to avoid aero interference.
---
See also ....
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 06:46 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Coasting Down the Peak
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: M I C H I G A N
Posts: 514
Thanks: 27
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
|
Automatic?
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 06:55 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 500
Thanks: 6
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
|
Arent they all?
__________________
'05 Outback XT, 19 mpg
BP-turbo 93 Festiva (long gone)
1/4 mile - 12.50@111.5
Best MPG - 36.8
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 11:23 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Yes, they're all automatics. I think it's a 4 speed/overdrive.
Here's the type of trailer used:
|
|
|
04-10-2009, 12:57 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Over 25mpg for a whole tank?
I don't have a tonneau and have to baby mine to break 20mpg.
What's the secret?
|
|
|
04-10-2009, 11:44 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
|
My 04 Odyssey 3.5 V6 is a 5-speed auto. I'm almost positive this is the same.
My results match, especially the dip at 43 mph. The shift points are 10, 20, 30, and 45 mph. See that last one? It doesn't match. The 40-45 mph span is just painful as the engine revs but won't shift. I generally try to keep it below 40 or above 45. You can do a quick D-N-D shift and get it to shift sooner, down to about 42 mph.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
04-10-2009, 06:57 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Ridgeline Rookie: I haven't driven the truck for a full tank, so I can't tell you what it's capable of.
Note that the figures in the graph are taken from bi-directional runs of about 1.6 km each way.
But I'd say you could easily beat 20 mpg for a highway tank, not even using any special driving techniques. You just have to keep the speed down.
|
|
|
04-10-2009, 07:19 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
My 04 Odyssey 3.5 V6 is a 5-speed auto. I'm almost positive this is the same.
|
Same specs on the Ridgeline - 5-speed.
Quote:
My results match, especially the dip at 43 mph.
|
The truck will hold top gear below 43 after it has engaged, so I could have accelerated above 45, then dropped down to 43 (70 km/h) and that would have undoubtedly been the high point in the graph.
But I decided to do the runs straight up, no messin' around.
|
|
|
04-10-2009, 08:48 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
The truck will hold top gear below 43 after it has engaged, so I could have accelerated above 45, then dropped down to 43 (70 km/h) and that would have undoubtedly been the high point in the graph.
But I decided to do the runs straight up, no messin' around.
|
Again, same behavior here. Doing the D-N-D shift makes it think it was already in 5th, and it'll drop right down and hold it. I use this all the time.
I agree with your decision to go straight up.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
04-10-2009, 08:53 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
How in the world did you figure out the D-N-D trick?
|
|
|
|