06-30-2011, 02:05 PM
|
#91 (permalink)
|
Making Ecomods a G thing
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83
MetroMPG -
I like these spoilers the most, the "flush-kamm-back" looking ones :
Ford Hydrogen Fusion 999 in grey primer
Autoblog Green — We Obsessively Cover The Green Scene
Hmmmm. In the "grey primer" image, there is a parachute tucked in the back. Maybe they're main purpose is to act as parachute shields?!?!?!?!?
CarloSW2
|
Cleaner separation for better parachute effect???
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
07-05-2011, 02:59 PM
|
#92 (permalink)
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,745
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
Alfa Romeo 156 (OEM option?)
I can imagine stretching some fabric between this spoiler and the rear pillars/roof and getting an elastic Kammback which will allow the trunk to be opened.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-05-2012, 02:58 PM
|
#93 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: planet earth
Posts: 30
PT Cruiser - '01 Chrysler PT Cruiser Limited Edition 90 day: 27.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
i have a pt cruiser with a rear spoiler, since im not technically inclined im afraid of taking it off for fear of not being able to put it back on if it does help mileage. is there anyone that can tell me if that rear spoiler actually does help on mileage with my particular car or not? im not talking about the little "lip" spoiler, im talking about the actual spoiler that comes off the top back of the car.
|
|
|
04-05-2012, 04:52 PM
|
#94 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
|
If you could post a side view, telephoto if possible to reduce perspective, we could take an educated guess.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
|
|
|
04-05-2012, 07:29 PM
|
#95 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: planet earth
Posts: 30
PT Cruiser - '01 Chrysler PT Cruiser Limited Edition 90 day: 27.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
here is a side of a pt with the same spoiler on the back
|
|
|
04-05-2012, 07:49 PM
|
#96 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,228
Thanks: 24,375
Thanked 7,357 Times in 4,757 Posts
|
spoiler
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderjava
here is a side of a pt with the same spoiler on the back
|
The PT is a square back and does not generate lift so I'm guessing that the spoiler is serving a styling function,it keeps a little sun out of the car in summer,it may be creating a jet of air to mitigate back-soiling of the rear windshield,and in a 4-season environment,if the snow is heavy enough,it might provide a protected clear slit underneath for rear vision if snow is trying to build up on the glass.
Dimensionally,it's not large enough to significantly impact mpg.Just an opinion.
|
|
|
04-05-2012, 07:59 PM
|
#97 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: planet earth
Posts: 30
PT Cruiser - '01 Chrysler PT Cruiser Limited Edition 90 day: 27.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
so in other words your opinion is no it should stay where it is?
|
|
|
04-05-2012, 10:25 PM
|
#98 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
I'll be starting the testing of one of the flush mount kammback style spoilers tomorrow. I went to the store tonight and am not sure, but almost felt a difference in coast down time. We will see tomorrow. Here is a pic of my version. More to come later
http://i1255.photobucket.com/albums/...5-12_18-30.jpg
|
|
|
04-05-2012, 10:28 PM
|
#99 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
If it was my car, I'd try it without and try to see if a trend shows up in the gaslog.
|
|
|
04-06-2012, 01:09 PM
|
#100 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Chrysler fitted the later PT's with a small "lip" spoiler on top of the hatch in later years. I bet they are lift- & drag-reducing.
So if I had one of these cars, I'd swap for the lip spoiler. (Well, if I had one of these, I'd do an A-B-A comparison of both types first ... no, then I'd probably abandon spoilers altogether for a kammback or boat tail)
Maybe you can find someone on a PT forum willing to do a swap.
|
|
|
|