Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2012, 11:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
How Low Can You Go?

I'm putting this here, though it might be more appropriate in the Aerodynamics Section (???).

The question is, what would be the minimum ground clearance for a street-driven car?


I did some measuring the other day, and my car currently measures ~ 7" from factory side skirt/front air dam to ground. I'm planning to put together custom side skirts and a front air dam that would extend farther down, but I want to maintain a basic amount of ground clearance. Also, IF I decide to get springs/coilovers, the ride height would drop an additional ~ 1.5" overall.

Anyway, I'm just looking for a consensus of opinion on the minimum clearance I need. Here in the city, there can be somewhat steep parking garage inclines, but otherwise, it's mostly flat, paved road.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-24-2012, 12:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
4.5 inches for stuff you don't want destroyed is about minimum.

Coincidentally, a Pepsi can works very good as a measuring tool.

Very thin UHMW makes a good front skirt which can hang lower to keep air out from under the car.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to drmiller100 For This Useful Post:
Ladogaboy (02-24-2012)
Old 02-24-2012, 01:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
My Rabbit's oil pan is 4" off the ground (coilovers) and I've had no real issue. But it's got insane approach/departure angles. The Probe's air dam hung down about the same amount (before I changed it) and would scrape quite regularly, especially when driving straight up ramps.

My advice: buy the coilovers, lower the thing 2" or more. Get a larger air dam (and a few spares). You can get away with a lot if you learn to drive up and down ramps at an angle for more clearance.

Go on YouTube for videos of lowered cars driving around and you'll see some of the stuff you might encounter. For the dedicated it's a challenge. For the casual it's a hindrance. Under 3 or 4 inches you start getting into trouble, and less than that, you are either insanely dedicated or on air ride.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store

Last edited by Sven7; 02-24-2012 at 01:39 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
Ladogaboy (02-24-2012)
Old 02-24-2012, 02:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
With the undercarriage/pan, I think I have about 8" of clearance right now. I'm really just looking to extend the side skirts and front dam.

The coilovers sound nice, but I'll have to be saving up for those (~ $2,000 for the ones I'd want).

The UHMW sounds like a very interesting option. It's cheap enough that I might be willing to get a section and start fooling around with it.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 03:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
It's pointless to go too low because I've read from several sources (Hucho, aerohead, etc.) that IIRC 5" or so is optimal.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 03:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
It's pointless to go too low because I've read from several sources (Hucho, aerohead, etc.) that IIRC 5" or so is optimal.
Interesting. So no gains after 5", or is it diminishing returns? I find that to be an intriguing number since (just with coilovers or lowering springs), I'd be at ~ 5".
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:45 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
I've read from NUMEROUS sources lower is better, as long as you have rake to the car.

The less air under the car, the better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 12:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
My old '94 Vette had 5.25". Stock.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 12:46 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
If no belly pan, then go as low as you can.

Just my two cents.

When I see a race car or speed record holder holding it to 5 inches, maybe I'll be swayed.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
drmiller100 (02-25-2012)
Old 02-24-2012, 12:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Already answered question: Look up the word "lowrider".

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com