Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-29-2010, 06:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
Engineering first
 
bwilson4web's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 843

17 i3-REx - '14 BMW i3-REx
Last 3: 45.67 mpg (US)

Blue Bob's - '19 Tesla Std Rng Plus
Thanks: 94
Thanked 246 Times in 157 Posts
hybrid plateau

Hi,

Recently, I had occasion to analyze the EPA data for low mileage hybrids:


What struck me was how commercial hybrids had plateaued between 45-50 MPG. Understand, I'm not out for individual performance but rather a more difficult challenge:
  • What 'affordable' mods could add +5 MPG to stock hybrids?
Think in terms of "JC Whitney" mods, something that doesn't take our skill level to install. I'm sniffin' around for what is often called 'low hanging fruit.'

My short list:
  • full block, bumper inlet block - using an under body or other vent. The idea is a unit that either handles damage easily and/or is cheap enough to be replaces for little or no cost.
  • rear wheel covers - a simple system that can be easily painted and removed or flipped to handle tire rotation or repair.
  • Prius docking station - a curb that the owner parks on that handles engine compartment, not just engine or transmission, pre-warmup. Ideally it works out doors.
Thoughts?

Bob Wilson

__________________
2019 Tesla Model 3 Std. Range Plus - 215 mi EV
2017 BMW i3-REx - 106 mi EV, 88 mi mid-grade
Retired engineer, Huntsville, AL
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-29-2010, 07:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
A full belly pan and block heater would be easy and cheap mods.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 07:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,803

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
The cooling air path won't benefit by being convoluted. I'd focus on making smooth, sealed ducting to the rad that can flex to vary the intake area to meet demand. I'd try to center the intake at the front stagnation point to minimize fan use.

I wonder if we might benefit from using oversize rads to reduce the needed airflow. I guess it wouldn't be hard to put a thermometer probe on each side of the rad to compare outflow temperature to water temperature in the top hose. There are probably aero benefits to slower flow through the rad as well as reduced volume. The team that built the globe-circling Voyager aircraft had to write their own textbook for our kind of speeds, and still gave up 20% of total drag to cooling - while flying, not rolling. I smell fruit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 08:46 PM   #4 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I've often wondered why a cooling system needs a radiator. Why not just a long aluminum pipe running fore and aft that uses the air running under the car to cool the antifreeze passively? My bone stock Maxima barely gets to 190 degrees on a 90 degree day (while driving conservatively mind you) and I suspect allowing it to get to 210 wouldn't hurt anything.

Why does a cooling system have to be non aerodynamic? Often questioning common logic gets me in trouble, so dish it out, no need to be nice

I've often envisioned a shallow aluminium tank under the car full of antifreeze ready to cool to replace the mileage sucking radiator as we know it. Some insulation between the body and pan would keep heat out of the car quite nicely I imagine, but I don't know everything
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 09:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,803

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
Radiators have evolved to maximize the area for heat transfer with minimum weight and cost. A few ships have used the type of pipe you describe, but they are transferring to water. The 1911 Napier had its engine surrounded by copper pipes to make a streamlined enclosure with cooling surface. Generally, you want to protect the pressurized coolant from casual damage.

Theoretically, a duct with a rad can work as a low-temperature jet engine and add thrust. Many texts refer to the P-51 Mustang aircraft achieving negative drag from the rad housing, but it wasn't copied on the Voyager. As is usual on aircraft, it had a variable exit, rather than a variable intake, but that made little difference to the air. With the flow restricted, the ring of stagnant air replacing the stagnation point would just reduce its diameter, while the high pressure zone handled the flow shaping adequately.

A snowmobile has a underbody panel system like the one you describe, but if it is not sprayed with snow, as when running on ice or roads, it overheats.

Last edited by Bicycle Bob; 05-29-2010 at 09:17 PM.. Reason: more, better
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 09:19 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
I've often wondered why a cooling system needs a radiator. Why not just a long aluminum pipe running fore and aft that uses the air running under the car to cool the antifreeze passively? My bone stock Maxima barely gets to 190 degrees on a 90 degree day (while driving conservatively mind you) and I suspect allowing it to get to 210 wouldn't hurt anything.

Why does a cooling system have to be non aerodynamic? Often questioning common logic gets me in trouble, so dish it out, no need to be nice

I've often envisioned a shallow aluminium tank under the car full of antifreeze ready to cool to replace the mileage sucking radiator as we know it. Some insulation between the body and pan would keep heat out of the car quite nicely I imagine, but I don't know everything
This could be amazing! A belly pan and no radiator.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 12:11 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
My bone stock Maxima barely gets to 190 degrees on a 90 degree day (while driving conservatively mind you) and I suspect allowing it to get to 210 wouldn't hurt anything.
But remember you have to design for worst case. I bet the temps you see are driving on fairly level roads. You'll generate a lot more heat when you're e.g. climbing 4000 vertical ft at a 6% or steeper grade.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 01:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
Engineering first
 
bwilson4web's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 843

17 i3-REx - '14 BMW i3-REx
Last 3: 45.67 mpg (US)

Blue Bob's - '19 Tesla Std Rng Plus
Thanks: 94
Thanked 246 Times in 157 Posts
This winter I fully blocked our ZVW30 (2010 Prius) bumper air inlet and saw a 5% improvement in mileage. I'm thinking a bumper air inlet block with a valve wired with the fans or thermistor might be an answer. The trick is curving the valve edges so we don't get whistles and air noise.

The other challenge is handling bumper events. It needs to deal with minor incidents and in the event of damage, be repaired or replaced for little money. This makes the problem much more interesting.

Bob Wilson
__________________
2019 Tesla Model 3 Std. Range Plus - 215 mi EV
2017 BMW i3-REx - 106 mi EV, 88 mi mid-grade
Retired engineer, Huntsville, AL
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 08:10 AM   #9 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
Interesting picture. Assuming they are all stock, the main variable is the nut behind the wheel.

There's a lot of people in the middle who drive "normally"

Theres some leadfoots on the left.

Theres some extra efficient drivers on the right.

Would look different if it were L/100km.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 03:49 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
What is the unlabeled x-axis of that graph?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are hybrid SUVs a good or bad thing? SVOboy Hybrids 71 05-05-2017 03:24 PM
Sat, Sep 19th, Houston Hybrid and Hypermilers Club Dan. Events & Meet-ups 6 09-19-2009 09:02 PM
Honda Insight Concept to Debut at Paris Int. Auto Show SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 32 04-17-2009 10:45 AM
Milwaukee Hybrid Group Meet 3-28-09 Daox Events & Meet-ups 1 03-28-2009 09:04 PM
Honda Begins Use of Class 8 Hybrid Truck Q1000 Hybrids 0 03-11-2009 07:55 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com