Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2011, 02:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Hot rodder eco wannabe
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: kansas city
Posts: 25

The truck now the car - '04 Pontiac Sunfire SE
Thanks: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Air intake muffler delete on a Pontiac Sunfire

I’ve got an eco mod and a performance mod for people with a Cavalier/Sunfire (J-body). Other people can benefit from this too. The steps will be different, but the benefit will be the same.

I remembered that the J-body has an air box or intake muffler in the driver’s side fender. Eliminating this air box frees up the restrictive catacombs that the incoming air has to go through to enter your engine. I did this mod in under 70 minutes including jacking up the car and with the help of pneumatic tools.

How is this an eco/performance mod? This air box is kind of like you running marathon breathing through a straw. If you get rid of the restriction then your car can breathe better and more efficiently. This translates to you not needing to press the accelerator pedal down more than you need to to get going. Less pedal means less gas injected into the engine saving you fuel. And your engine will thank you for it. Just keep you foot out of the pedal because less restriction means your car will be a lot more rev happy.

All you need for this is a jack and jack stands, ratchet set, screwdriver flathead and phillips, pliers, Optional tools, a sawsall and a long blade (if you don’t have one read the article for alternative), compressor, air ratchet, impact wrench and sockets, hammer and punch

On to the mod!

Jack the car up, place jack stands under the car as required (I put them under the lower control arm). If you don’t know where your car’s jacking points are look in your owner’s manual. Take off the driver’s front wheel. It’s a lot easier that way. In the engine compartment, if you have a strut tower bar go ahead and unbolt the driver’s side of the bar with a 13mm ratchet. There is a fuse box that you’ll need to remove that is right over the filter box. All you need to remove that is pliers. Take out the center plug of the fastener, and then you can pull the rest of the fastener out. The other side is only held in by a tab. Lift the front where the fastener was and pull the fuse box up. You don’t need to disconnect any wires you’re doing this just to have room to pull the filter box up.

Unscrew the 4 bolts of the filter box with a flathead or Phillips screwdriver whatever your preference. Unscrew the band clamp closest to the engine/throttle body. Take the plastic ducting along with the top of the filter box and air filter and set it aside. The only thing holding the bottom of the air filter box on the car is a tab next to the firewall. You just need to bend that tab back a little to get the filter box off. If you can’t bend the tab with your fingers then you’ll need a small pry bar or big flathead screwdriver. Be sure to wrap the pry bar/screwdriver in a paper towel so as to not scratch the paint. After the tab is bent take the bottom of the air filter box out. You’ll see the ducting of the box connects to the air muffler in the fender. You can press out one more fastener. It’s the plastic nipple that holds the air intake of the air muffler to the body of the car. It’s down from the plastic fastener from the fuse box that you took off. If you can’t locate it you can just tug it out when the air muffler is free. If you did find it press it out with a hammer and the proper sized punch.

Get down on a creeper (or the floor), take a 7mm ratchet and unbolt 3 bolts that hold the underside plastic on, then unbolt the 2 bolts in the outside wheel well. There are 2 more bolts on the inside wheel well only loosen those. The plastic of the wheel well will still be attached by 2 plastic fasteners at the top, taking these out is unnecessary (and they usually break just enough so you have to buy more from the dealership $2 or 3 each). The plastic will be pliable enough to do what you need to do.

Unbolt the upper bolt (10mm or 13mm depends which year) with the metal tab on the backside of the air muffler. Discard it/recycle it. You won’t use it again. If you already pressed out the air intake of the air muffler in the engine bay you only have one bolt left, but you have to unbolt the windshield washer fluid reservoir. (Thanks GM engineers for making something easy harder to do!) I didn’t do that… I got out my sawsall, put a long blade in it, and cut the backside of the bottom box of the air muffler half way through. ONLY CUT HALF WAY THROUGH! THERE ARE WIRES ON THE FRONT SIDE! Then cut the front of the bottom box. Once that comes off the air muffler comes right out. Button everything back up, clean up and take a test drive.

If you don’t have a sawsall there are coupons in many magazines and even some Sunday papers for Harbor Freight that have sawsalls for around $20. If you don’t have that coupon then I think regular price is $40. That’s good price for any saw. These are good cheap tools, not bad cheaply made tools. If you don’t have a sawsall or don’t have a Harbor Freight store or the like in your area you’re stuck with draining the washer fluid reservoir, and unbolting it to get to that last bolt.

Since doing this I’ve noticed that I don’t have to rev the engine as much to get started. Even starting in 2nd gear isn’t a chore. The engine revs easier. The car doesn’t hesitate when going around a corner in 3rd gear or going up hill in a numerically higher gear. My car is happy and I’m happy because it’s easier to drive.

As soon as the test drive was over I filled up and it’s time to do a mileage test.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-12-2011, 03:51 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Less pedal means less gas injected into the engine saving you fuel.
See right there is the major fault in your premise that this actually accomplishes anything eco. To extract x amount of throttled power the engine NEEDS to be restricted x amount. The source of the restriction for eco purposes is irrelevant.

Show us a watertight A-B-A.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Joenavy85 (07-13-2011), mcrews (07-12-2011)
Old 07-12-2011, 12:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
exacttly, well said FL
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 02:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
It sucks that its such a PITA to remove that from your car it takes about 25min to do it on my Bonneville remove 2 screws and loosen a band clamp then pull up. To remove the intake muffler use a screw driver and hammer at plastic welds, now reinstall air box. I went a step further and opened the front of the box also.

The air box is not really a restriction till you get into high RPMs and the MPG change will be .01-.7 better at most IF driving it the same way as before. The real benefit to this mod is better throttle response, and that can save gas.

Before anyone says anything here is the reason that it can save gas. Having better throttle response means there will be less delay in the engines ability to rev. If the engine can rev easier and faster changes in TPS are easier to detect allowing for more fine tuning of speed when cruising, and less time spent accelerating. In the end the change might not do anything for MPG but it will give a better seat of the pants feel and can allow the driver to better adjust the throttle for more efficient driving.
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 10:23 AM   #5 (permalink)
Hot rodder eco wannabe
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: kansas city
Posts: 25

The truck now the car - '04 Pontiac Sunfire SE
Thanks: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
See right there is the major fault in your premise that this actually accomplishes anything eco. To extract x amount of throttled power the engine NEEDS to be restricted x amount. The source of the restriction for eco purposes is irrelevant.

Show us a watertight A-B-A.
Frank,
You are almost correct in what you’re saying, but you’re confusing restriction(CFM) and vacuum. Higher vacuum is what gives you more gas mileage. Not higher restriction (lower CFM). The reason for the vacuum is the engine trying to suck air through a partially open throttle body. Because I have deleted the air intake muffler I have better flow to the throttle body; therefore I don’t need to open the throttle body more to get the same acceleration I did before the mod. Because the throttle body isn’t open as much the throttle position sensor ( or TPS) isn’t sending the computer the signal to inject more fuel into the engine.

My modification doesn’t deal with decreasing vacuum it deals with increasing flow measured in CFM. By getting rid of the restriction it can have more flow to the throttle body.
For example, in the world of head porting and polishing the object of the porting/ gasket match is to open up the intake and exhaust runners increasing CFM. Before and after the porting the technician measures the flow. Of course there has to be a constant or a control to see how much more CFM is flowing in and out of the cylinders. That control is vacuum. Let’s say a regular unported 350 head flows 180 CFM at 28 inches of vacuum before the porting. Then after the porting the technician has to have the correct vacuum to make a good comparison of the CFM gain. It’ll still be 28 inches of vacuum.

As far as the watertight A-B-A, this vehicle is to go to work and back which is 20 miles so I use a more realistic test like driving until the tank gets down to 1/4 tank then fill it up and calculate the results.

That will be in about 2 weeks... Can you feel the tension rising?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 10:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
Hot rodder eco wannabe
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: kansas city
Posts: 25

The truck now the car - '04 Pontiac Sunfire SE
Thanks: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Phantom;249928]It sucks that its such a PITA to remove that from your car it takes about 25min

The air box is not really a restriction till you get into high RPMs and the MPG change will be .01-.7 better at most IF driving it the same way as before. The real benefit to this mod is better throttle response, and that can save gas.

Phantom, thanks for the post. Whether it was a PITA or not. I'm glad I did it.

I've actually done this mod on my girlfriend's (now wife) 2001 Sunfire with a 150k miles on it. It had the older OHV 2.2L engine and an automatic transmission. She went from getting 26 mpg to 28 mpg. It had no other mods done to it. I'm hoping for around that kind of gas mileage but I'm not betting on it. Every little bit helps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 11:38 AM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
That will be in about 2 weeks... Can you feel the tension rising?
Well... no, not really.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 06:07 PM   #8 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvey01 View Post
Less pedal means less gas injected into the engine saving you fuel.
More restriction from the throttle body, more pumping losses, less efficient use of fuel.

Quote:
Just keep you foot out of the pedal because less restriction means your car will be a lot more rev happy.
as has been said, irrelevant at other than close to WOT(thanks Phantom), as the throttle plate causes far more restriction than the intake pipe ever will
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 04:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Hot rodder eco wannabe
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: kansas city
Posts: 25

The truck now the car - '04 Pontiac Sunfire SE
Thanks: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have good news (for me). I went from a 36.2 MPG fill up to a 37.06 MPG (375.4/10.128) fill up. Let the hate posts begin.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 05:18 PM   #10 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,554 Posts
Silvey01, I'm glad to see you're getting better mileage. However, the fact of the matter really is that we have some great knowledgable users here that really do know a lot about engines and how they work, especially when related to efficiency. You can ignore these users, but it really isn't going to get you better mileage. There are a lot of misconceptions out there, and many are wildly proliferated via the internet and car forums. We do a lot of testing here to prove our modifications work (or don't work) which is pretty rare.

That being said, this modification is not responsible for getting you your extra 1 mpg. I would highly recommend looking over the 65+ mods list for staring out ecomodding. Its a very good list. The mods listed are proven modifications that do work.

__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com