Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2017, 09:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Eddie25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: south africa
Posts: 168

Fiesta - '06 Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ambiante
90 day: 45.9 mpg (US)

Dakar - '03 BMW f650 GS Dakar (retired)

Tucson - '07 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GLS
90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 172
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
hyundai i10 1,1 or 1,2

looking at downgrading the suv and get a little cheap runaround. it will be second hand but i am unsure of what engine size. here we get them in the 1,1 and 1,2 engine. logic will tell you the smaller engine will give better millage but according to this website not.

https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/h...-2008-11-63-hp

also this country has very hilly terrain so not sure how the smaller engine will cope vs the 100cc's more of the 1.2?

__________________



  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-19-2017, 11:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
I have a Honda Jazz 1.2, and Honda superseded it with the 1.3, for better fuel economy.
__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JockoT For This Useful Post:
Xist (09-19-2017)
Old 09-20-2017, 02:50 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Eddie25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: south africa
Posts: 168

Fiesta - '06 Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ambiante
90 day: 45.9 mpg (US)

Dakar - '03 BMW f650 GS Dakar (retired)

Tucson - '07 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GLS
90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 172
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
did some research and found there is quite a difference in the engines. 1.1 being 8 valve and 16 valve for the 1.2. think i will go for the 1.2 if one comes up in my price range
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 10:31 AM   #4 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
The 8-valve 1.1L actually doesn't seem to be so bad, even though it has a marginally lower peak torque. At least the peak torque is delivered at a lower RPM range.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 08:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
People who report better milage from bigger engines generally aren't hypermilers.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 10:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
People who report better milage from bigger engines generally aren't hypermilers.
It depends. But in such a small car, I would not disconsider the smaller engine since the load factor is also low.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2017, 10:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
I'd go for the Twincam for what should be better volumetric efficiency. In the end the fuel use for the extra 0.1l isn't going to make a significant difference.

I'm happyish with my little Proton SOHC, but am basically wishing the whole time it had a DOHC and an extra 0.1l.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2017, 12:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
I'd go for what is better mantained, even though the presumably easier repairability and more ruggedness of the SOHC would be a valuable asset.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com