09-19-2017, 10:43 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: south africa
Posts: 168
Fiesta - '06 Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ambiante 90 day: 45.9 mpg (US) Dakar - '03 BMW f650 GS Dakar (retired) Tucson - '07 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GLS 90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 172
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
|
hyundai i10 1,1 or 1,2
looking at downgrading the suv and get a little cheap runaround. it will be second hand but i am unsure of what engine size. here we get them in the 1,1 and 1,2 engine. logic will tell you the smaller engine will give better millage but according to this website not.
https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/h...-2008-11-63-hp
also this country has very hilly terrain so not sure how the smaller engine will cope vs the 100cc's more of the 1.2?
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-19-2017, 12:05 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
I have a Honda Jazz 1.2, and Honda superseded it with the 1.3, for better fuel economy.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JockoT For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-20-2017, 03:50 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: south africa
Posts: 168
Fiesta - '06 Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ambiante 90 day: 45.9 mpg (US) Dakar - '03 BMW f650 GS Dakar (retired) Tucson - '07 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GLS 90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 172
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
|
did some research and found there is quite a difference in the engines. 1.1 being 8 valve and 16 valve for the 1.2. think i will go for the 1.2 if one comes up in my price range
__________________
|
|
|
09-20-2017, 11:31 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
The 8-valve 1.1L actually doesn't seem to be so bad, even though it has a marginally lower peak torque. At least the peak torque is delivered at a lower RPM range.
|
|
|
09-20-2017, 09:09 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
|
People who report better milage from bigger engines generally aren't hypermilers.
|
|
|
09-20-2017, 11:55 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile
People who report better milage from bigger engines generally aren't hypermilers.
|
It depends. But in such a small car, I would not disconsider the smaller engine since the load factor is also low.
|
|
|
09-23-2017, 11:23 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
|
I'd go for the Twincam for what should be better volumetric efficiency. In the end the fuel use for the extra 0.1l isn't going to make a significant difference.
I'm happyish with my little Proton SOHC, but am basically wishing the whole time it had a DOHC and an extra 0.1l.
|
|
|
09-24-2017, 01:17 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
I'd go for what is better mantained, even though the presumably easier repairability and more ruggedness of the SOHC would be a valuable asset.
|
|
|
|