10-05-2020, 06:04 PM
|
#81 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtlethargic
Regarding the AST: truncation of the tail has been a key part, so I don't see the shown overlays as evidence against its use, but for it.
|
What has truncation of the tail got to do with The Template?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-05-2020, 06:49 PM
|
#82 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,492
Thanks: 8,059
Thanked 8,859 Times in 7,313 Posts
|
It's what makes it work in the real world. The full taper adds 50% or more of unusable space.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
10-05-2020, 07:03 PM
|
#83 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
It's what makes it work in the real world. The full taper adds 50% or more of unusable space.
|
Yes.
But any car shape can be truncated. Truncation, as such, has nothing to do with using The Template as the shape guide.
I was writing in response to:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtlethargic
Regarding the AST: truncation of the tail has been a key part, so I don't see the shown overlays as evidence against its use, but for it.
|
Prior to the rear of the car, the two nominated cars don't follow The Template shape - and yet they're very low drag cars... again, how amazing is that!
|
|
|
10-05-2020, 07:07 PM
|
#84 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 632
Thanks: 28
Thanked 148 Times in 116 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar
What has truncation of the tail got to do with The Template?
|
The cars posted align with the template pretty well. They have truncated tails, which is part of the AST deal.
|
|
|
10-05-2020, 07:10 PM
|
#85 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 632
Thanks: 28
Thanked 148 Times in 116 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar
Yes.
But any car shape can be truncated. Truncation, as such, has nothing to do with using The Template as the shape guide.
I was writing in response to:
Prior to the rear of the car, the two nominated cars don't follow The Template shape - and yet they're very low drag cars... again, how amazing is that!
|
It seems that you've misunderstood the intended uses of and precautions given for the AST.
|
|
|
10-05-2020, 07:11 PM
|
#86 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtlethargic
The cars posted align with the template pretty well. They have truncated tails, which is part of the AST deal.
|
I am sorry, but if you think the upper rear angle of the cars aligns well with The Template rear angle, you must see things quite differently to me.
Of course, there's absolutely no requirement to follow The Template when designing a low drag car (or additions to any other car) and it's a damn shame that so many people have been sucked into believing that on this group.
|
|
|
10-05-2020, 07:13 PM
|
#87 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtlethargic
It seems that you've misunderstood the intended uses of and precautions given for the AST.
|
No, I have watched how it actually has been used here. For example, to:
- to determine whether airflow is attached or separated
- to determine the required height of rear spoilers
- as an assessment tool to judge the aerodynamic purity of production cars
- to guide the best shape of rear car extensions to existing cars
All completely unjustifiable!
|
|
|
10-05-2020, 07:19 PM
|
#88 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 632
Thanks: 28
Thanked 148 Times in 116 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar
No, I have watched how it actually has been used here. For example, to:
- to determine whether airflow is attached or separated
- to determine the required height of rear spoilers
- as an assessment tool to judge the aerodynamic purity of production cars
- to guide the best shape of rear car extensions to existing cars
All completely unjustifiable!
|
Have you seen the text information that usually accompanies the AST? I believe there are notes on at least one version.
|
|
|
10-05-2020, 07:56 PM
|
#89 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
When I was first reading about the template, it was made clear that it was a 2-D form and that actual 3-D cars would be able to deviate from it quite well.
But it was a starting point. Short of making and testing multiple prototypes with your daily driver, you could do a lot worse than building to the template, testing, and being happy with the results.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-05-2020, 08:01 PM
|
#90 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie
When I was first reading about the template, it was made clear that it was a 2-D form and that actual 3-D cars would be able to deviate from it quite well.
But it was a starting point. Short of making and testing multiple prototypes with your daily driver, you could do a lot worse than building to the template, testing, and being happy with the results.
|
As I said, it's obviously gone down a waaay different rabbit hole in the years since!
And, "you could do a lot worse than" is, with respect, rather strange logic isn't it? Don't we want people to achieve the best that's possible for them?
That's just like saying: "When tuning, run an AFR of 12.5:1 at full load - you could do a lot worse than that, you know." Well, yes you could - but it's also very likely you could do better.
|
|
|
|