Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2018, 11:55 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
Warm air intake/ resonator removal

I have been thinking about redoing the intake on my wife's 2001 subaru outback. Currently it has a factory cold air intake with a resonator. I understand the role the resonator plays in the vehicle's performance, but I believe it is only effective with the CAI setup the car currently has. If I removed the resonator and replaced it with a non restrictive warm air intake, could I possibly see significant gains?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-18-2018, 01:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor95 View Post
I have been thinking about redoing the intake on my wife's 2001 subaru outback. Currently it has a factory cold air intake with a resonator. I understand the role the resonator plays in the vehicle's performance, but I believe it is only effective with the CAI setup the car currently has. If I removed the resonator and replaced it with a non restrictive warm air intake, could I possibly see significant gains?
There's a lot of disagreement on this site about how effective a warm air intake is. Many people think that what happens is the warmer air creates a leaner air fuel ratio. But that's not the case. As warmer air comes in through the intake, there will be less oxygen and the engine computer will reduce the amount of fuel. But the real benefit to your fuel economy comes when in order to accomplish the same amount of power you depress the throttle further. by opening the throttle plate further, you reduce the restriction on the engine referred to generally as pumping losses. The reduction in pumping losses is in effect an increase in the efficiency of the engine. But saying that doesn't prove that installing a warm air intake will increase the fuel economy of your car.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
Taylor95 (08-18-2018)
Old 08-18-2018, 01:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
What do you think about the resonator? I think that it only helps in the specific factory application on my car... I think that if I were to change things around I should remove it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 03:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KY
Posts: 1,351

IGL - '04 Saturn Ion
Team Saturn
90 day: 56.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 365 Times in 268 Posts
I vote for deleting the intake resonator, to remove the restrictions...
__________________
My current Ecotec project...


My last Ecotec project...
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 19bonestock88 For This Useful Post:
Taylor95 (08-18-2018)
Old 08-19-2018, 10:11 AM   #5 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
I also think you want to track your intake air temp before you change anything. Get a baseline of comparison between ambient temps and IAT readings. IAT will be higher than ambient even in a stock vehicle. You wanna know if you improve the delta from stock configuration as a basic way of knowing if your WAI design is doing anything. Temps in an engine compartment are always higher than ambient when the engine gets hot.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2018, 11:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
teoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245

A3 - '12 Audi A3
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
The warm air vaporizes the fuel better. And with a warmer mix you get faster combustion.

But the resonator (depending on which rpm it is tuned to provide benefit) makes the air jiggle about at a specific frequency and it can ram in to the engine providing more air.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2018, 07:39 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,014

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,869
Thanked 2,513 Times in 1,553 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by teoman View Post
The warm air vaporizes the fuel better. And with a warmer mix you get faster combustion.
Very true. And, as California98Civic says, you also have reduced pumping losses with a conventional automatic or manual. This will not be the case with a Subaru CVT, however, as reduced power will just cause it to rev higher. I could see this as being counterproductive.

Only way to know for sure is to test. I'd think running one in winter, at least, would be a good idea.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2018, 11:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,170

Sport Utility Prius - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 52.98 mpg (US)

300k Sequoia 4WD - '01 Toyota Sequoia Limited 4wd
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 265 Times in 212 Posts
I'd almost bet your vehicle has no problems quickly building up the heat to run efficiently.
Once the vehicle is already warm there is nothing to gain with a wai. A lot of 4 cylinder/ stop start cars have problems maintaining temp, but large engine vehicles with no start stop heat up almost immediately and produce excess heat and any extra heat consumed is just bled off by running the cooling circuit more often.
__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."

Last edited by hayden55; 08-21-2018 at 11:42 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2018, 11:12 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,014

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,869
Thanked 2,513 Times in 1,553 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hayden55 View Post
I'd almost bet your Jeep has no problems quickly building up the heat to run efficiently.
Once the vehicle is already warm there is nothing to gain with a wai. A lot of 4 cylinder/ stop start cars have problems maintaining temp, but large engine vehicles with no start stop heat up almost immediately and produce excess heat and any extra heat consumed is just bled off by running the cooling circuit more often.
Not necessarily. The temperature of air drawn into the cylinder does have an impact on combustion, regardless of how warm the engine is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2018, 11:35 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,170

Sport Utility Prius - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 52.98 mpg (US)

300k Sequoia 4WD - '01 Toyota Sequoia Limited 4wd
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 265 Times in 212 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
Not necessarily. The temperature of air drawn into the cylinder does have an impact on combustion, regardless of how warm the engine is.
Hey in theory that is 100% true.

__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."

Last edited by hayden55; 08-21-2018 at 11:43 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com