11-29-2017, 09:08 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,977
Thanks: 8,223
Thanked 8,995 Times in 7,431 Posts
|
Quote:
I am sort of obligated to get a truck because i work with a contractor and will constantly need my tool with me ( I have A LOT)
|
Phrasing? Tense agreement? ![Wink](/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif) 19yr-old? C-10? Stance it.
c10 | StanceNation
They came with an inline six. Instead of an in-line motor in the driveline; consider an altermotor from the Buick LaCrosse hybrid. Less volts, less problems.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tor-35003.html
Also — welcome to Ecomodder.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-29-2017, 10:21 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 81
Thanks: 29
Thanked 32 Times in 27 Posts
|
A new model 2wd toyota pickup with the 5spd and a fuel injected 22re will get great fuel economy and you can get a lock box or customize a bedcap for security.
Im only staying with pickups because i assume you have alot of tools and the weight would be counter productive to a car and trailer in terms of cost and practicality.
|
|
|
12-02-2017, 06:59 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 477
Thanks: 55
Thanked 95 Times in 74 Posts
|
What kind of work do you do and about how much do all your tools weigh? Even an S-10, Ranger, or Sonoma will carry a half ton. 1000 lbs of tools is a lot of tools.
__________________
If nice guys finish last, are you willing to pay the price to finish first ?
|
|
|
12-02-2017, 09:21 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShodMermaid336
Hello all,
My goal is to have a 350 V8 in front for fun
|
The 2004-2012 Chevrolet Colorado / GMC Canyon 4 cylinder engine is more powerful than most 60's and 70's SBC's. And the 2WD 5 speed version will get almost 30 MPG with no mods.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
12-02-2017, 09:36 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,892
Thanks: 506
Thanked 868 Times in 654 Posts
|
As we chat along the op left after day 1
I guess we’re not female friendly
|
|
|
12-02-2017, 10:12 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 726
Thanks: 208
Thanked 428 Times in 279 Posts
|
1+ 4x4 chassie( torsion bar ,they are easyer to keep low) rwd gas, fwd electric . Mount the batteries under the bed inbord of the frame. Doable, expensive, and time consuming. With a 4wd frame you can still drive in rwd wile you are building. At 19 I'm guessing that you have 1 rig so no projects that will take more than 72hrs (standerd weekend) are not aloud without consequences. Conciter a small diesel wv tdi 130-190hp stock. Or a 4bt Cummins backed by a nv5600 or nv4500 130hp tunable to much more . 4bts from bread trucks are a dime a dozen($1500 ebay for a cut frame includs trans ,wires , and evrything in front of the fire wall) the 6bt will fit in a 73-87 chevy by cutting the fire wall. 4bt is tight with all the coolers . Trick is keep the boost down, you should be able to pull 20-30mpg in a full size diesel with a 1000 load ,if you drive it right. If you could swing it +1 one of the new mid size diesel trucks may pay for it self(granted you will be working it for the next 50 years). There is an eco/aero modle Canyon/Colorado ... it is EPA rated at 29mpg. Active grill luvers and about 10 modds for better mpg. A frend got a 4x4 its purity pepy @160hp and 38X ftlb tq has pulled 35mpg hwyfrom the liometer . Basicly the same power in this as my stock 91.5 IC Cummins with 7200 tow J2807 and a lighter pacage.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20
![](http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig8842a.png)
Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg
|
|
|
12-02-2017, 11:17 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,977
Thanks: 8,223
Thanked 8,995 Times in 7,431 Posts
|
Quote:
As we chat along the op left after day 1
I guess we’re not female friendly
|
Oopsie. No more grammar jokes. ![Frown](/forum/images/smilies/frown.gif)
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
12-03-2017, 02:28 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,701 Times in 1,519 Posts
|
Integrating the electric-assist drive and the engine sounds quite labor-intensive, plus it's quite arguable that you would actually break-even the conversion cost. You could eventually get the engine tuned to a higher efficiency. A more modern truck with an already higher fuel-efficiency would probably be better as a reliable workhorse, unless you're just too fond of the looks of an old C-10. But anyway, considering how the newer trucks grew bigger than their older counterparts, it wouldn't seem to odd to retrofit a C-10 with a smaller engine out of a Colorado, for example.
|
|
|
|