02-04-2010, 01:13 PM
|
#101 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
|
Tumble and swirl should mix everything together real good.
Christ, the EGR is accounted for from MAF readings.
EGR does in fact slow the combustion rate, so maximum brake torque timing advances with EGR rates. I don't know the details of the sensors in your car, but may I suggest when EGR is activated you also activate a relay adding a very high resistance in line with the IAT sensor. If the ECU thinks it's -40 in there, that might get you ~2 degrees of advance.
Last edited by tasdrouille; 02-05-2010 at 11:13 AM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 02:22 PM
|
#102 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Interesting thoughts Christ. The Paseo uses a map sensor and temp sensor for sensing intake air. The map sensor will detect the difference in manifold vacuum, but the temp sensor won't see the hot EGR gas... Is it necessary to compensate for the hot EGR gas? Since I think I will need more ignition advance, I'm thinking that it would be best to bypass the temp sensor. If I'm wrong and get ping, there is a knock sensor to take care of retarding timing.
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 02:25 PM
|
#103 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Thanks for the info Tas. I had a feeling an EGR rich mixture would burn slower. So, I will need a way to advance timing... If the sensor trick doesn't work, I do have a greddy emanage blue laying around I can wire up. I was just hoping it wouldn't come to that. I don't think they deal with P&G well. Although, if this mod works well, I won't be P&Ging anymore (aka, the goal).
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 02:30 PM
|
#104 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
I don't think the MAP will actually see a difference in manifold vacuum.
Here's why:
The EGR isn't a forced gas, it's drawn in by vacuum. The ECM will see an increase in vacuum via the MAP sensor, but not understand that some percentage of that void is filled by EGR reflow. The vacuum in the manifold will remain the same regardless of where the flow comes from, but the MAP won't be able to compensate for the EGR flow.
That's why vacuum leaks cause so many problems. The engine vacuum is still the same at the valve's face, but the sensor (or carburetor) doesn't "see" the difference.
If you're already running a HAI, I wouldn't think the percentage of EGR you're going to reflow (less than 20% of total volume, I'd imagine?) is going to really affect temps that much, especially considering how much the gasses have already expanded and cooled by the time you get them back into the engine, so there shouldn't really be a need to compensate for temp, but you will need to adjust timing, like Tas said, to make up for the decrease in flame speed.
How much EGR are you planning to flow? That will help the discussion a little.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 02:35 PM
|
#105 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
As much as I can! I doubt I'll be able to flow as much as the 2010 Prius which has been quoted to run up to 30%. If I had to guess, I'd hope I can get up to 20%.
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 02:39 PM
|
#106 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Going strictly on volume and not mass, and assuming 100% VE, a 20% reduction in intake volume would bring you from a 1.5L to a 1.2L engine. Not bad at all.
Of course, given air temp and actual VE, you'll likely have something closer to a .9 or 1.0 or less at cruise.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 02:40 PM
|
#107 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Sounds great to me. Throw in a new tranny with lower final drive and I'll be right where I want to be.
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 03:15 PM
|
#108 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Actually, that last number is wholly incorrect, because I didn't account for throttle position during cruise, and for that, I'd have to know the VE and BSFC of the engine in it's new form to determine approximate torque at X rpm blahblahblah.
Still, I'd put cruise displacement somewhere between .6 and 1.0 (Bigger range, is all.)
Depending on things like piston travel and other factors such as exhaust/intake frequency, it could actually be better to stay at a higher RPM after you've reduced your effective displacement so much.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 08:02 PM
|
#109 (permalink)
|
ecomonkey
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: middleburg fl
Posts: 240
Thanks: 33
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
|
i read in a post about the 3 cyl metro motor ,being damaged by a clogged ? egr valve, im interested in your research ,but am no egr expert, what is the risk of engine damage? if any, i need to get another 150k out of my echo.
|
|
|
02-04-2010, 08:09 PM
|
#110 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
I'm not exactly sure what the problem is with the Metro. But, I think it has more to do with uneven amounts of EGR in each cylinder. Metro experts?
That said, EGR isn't the cleanest thing, and I'm sure my system will need to be cleaned out occasionally. Thats something to keep in mind as I route plumbing. Perhaps a U shaped trap like a sink drain has would help? Other ideas guys?
FYI, no progress on this for a little while, I'm on vacation now until the 14th.
|
|
|
|