Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-04-2010, 12:13 PM   #101 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
Tumble and swirl should mix everything together real good.

Christ, the EGR is accounted for from MAF readings.

EGR does in fact slow the combustion rate, so maximum brake torque timing advances with EGR rates. I don't know the details of the sensors in your car, but may I suggest when EGR is activated you also activate a relay adding a very high resistance in line with the IAT sensor. If the ECU thinks it's -40 in there, that might get you ~2 degrees of advance.

__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...

Last edited by tasdrouille; 02-05-2010 at 10:13 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-04-2010, 01:22 PM   #102 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Interesting thoughts Christ. The Paseo uses a map sensor and temp sensor for sensing intake air. The map sensor will detect the difference in manifold vacuum, but the temp sensor won't see the hot EGR gas... Is it necessary to compensate for the hot EGR gas? Since I think I will need more ignition advance, I'm thinking that it would be best to bypass the temp sensor. If I'm wrong and get ping, there is a knock sensor to take care of retarding timing.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 01:25 PM   #103 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Thanks for the info Tas. I had a feeling an EGR rich mixture would burn slower. So, I will need a way to advance timing... If the sensor trick doesn't work, I do have a greddy emanage blue laying around I can wire up. I was just hoping it wouldn't come to that. I don't think they deal with P&G well. Although, if this mod works well, I won't be P&Ging anymore (aka, the goal).
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 01:30 PM   #104 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I don't think the MAP will actually see a difference in manifold vacuum.

Here's why:

The EGR isn't a forced gas, it's drawn in by vacuum. The ECM will see an increase in vacuum via the MAP sensor, but not understand that some percentage of that void is filled by EGR reflow. The vacuum in the manifold will remain the same regardless of where the flow comes from, but the MAP won't be able to compensate for the EGR flow.

That's why vacuum leaks cause so many problems. The engine vacuum is still the same at the valve's face, but the sensor (or carburetor) doesn't "see" the difference.

If you're already running a HAI, I wouldn't think the percentage of EGR you're going to reflow (less than 20% of total volume, I'd imagine?) is going to really affect temps that much, especially considering how much the gasses have already expanded and cooled by the time you get them back into the engine, so there shouldn't really be a need to compensate for temp, but you will need to adjust timing, like Tas said, to make up for the decrease in flame speed.

How much EGR are you planning to flow? That will help the discussion a little.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 01:35 PM   #105 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
As much as I can! I doubt I'll be able to flow as much as the 2010 Prius which has been quoted to run up to 30%. If I had to guess, I'd hope I can get up to 20%.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 01:39 PM   #106 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Going strictly on volume and not mass, and assuming 100% VE, a 20% reduction in intake volume would bring you from a 1.5L to a 1.2L engine. Not bad at all.

Of course, given air temp and actual VE, you'll likely have something closer to a .9 or 1.0 or less at cruise.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 01:40 PM   #107 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Sounds great to me. Throw in a new tranny with lower final drive and I'll be right where I want to be.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 02:15 PM   #108 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Actually, that last number is wholly incorrect, because I didn't account for throttle position during cruise, and for that, I'd have to know the VE and BSFC of the engine in it's new form to determine approximate torque at X rpm blahblahblah.

Still, I'd put cruise displacement somewhere between .6 and 1.0 (Bigger range, is all.)

Depending on things like piston travel and other factors such as exhaust/intake frequency, it could actually be better to stay at a higher RPM after you've reduced your effective displacement so much.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 07:02 PM   #109 (permalink)
ecomonkey
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: middleburg fl
Posts: 240

silver clown - '02 toyota echo 2 door base
90 day: 47.16 mpg (US)

white ghost - '05 prius base
90 day: 47.53 mpg (US)

white pearl - '12 toyota prius base
Last 3: 45.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
i read in a post about the 3 cyl metro motor ,being damaged by a clogged ? egr valve, im interested in your research ,but am no egr expert, what is the risk of engine damage? if any, i need to get another 150k out of my echo.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 07:09 PM   #110 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
I'm not exactly sure what the problem is with the Metro. But, I think it has more to do with uneven amounts of EGR in each cylinder. Metro experts?

That said, EGR isn't the cleanest thing, and I'm sure my system will need to be cleaned out occasionally. Thats something to keep in mind as I route plumbing. Perhaps a U shaped trap like a sink drain has would help? Other ideas guys?

FYI, no progress on this for a little while, I'm on vacation now until the 14th.

__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My New 4cyl Compact Doesn't Get Good Mileage Stone Axe Introductions 13 02-08-2013 12:06 PM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 55 08-20-2012 11:34 PM
Trouble Code PO401 EGR Flow Insufficient Detected Ford Man Off-Topic Tech 4 12-09-2011 12:45 PM
How to get instant fuel consumption from Megasquirt TELVM Instrumentation 11 08-29-2011 02:47 PM
The Mechanism Behind Flow Separation LostCause Aerodynamics 46 07-15-2010 07:38 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com