Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-04-2010, 08:22 PM   #111 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
If I recall, the Metro problem is a coked up EGR passage that affects the middle cylinder. The result can be a burned exhaust valve (since EGR reduces combustion temperatures, without it, things get too toasty).

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-04-2010, 10:37 PM   #112 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
If I recall, the Metro problem is a coked up EGR passage that affects the middle cylinder. The result can be a burned exhaust valve (since EGR reduces combustion temperatures, without it, things get too toasty).
That seems to be what they say, that I've heard anyway.

Daox - For the care, cleaning, and maintenance of your system, short and straight as possible. There's nothing fluid, and unless you're going to filter it through water or some other fluid medium, or add in filters/screens, etc... just pipe it all in there, and maintain it accordingly. You'll be checking on it all the time anyway, I'm sure, so you'll get a feel for how long it takes before it needs to be cleaned out.

EGR cleaning should be a part of vehicle maintenance for anyone that does alot of cruising at steady speeds. It seems that those vehicles see coked EGR's the most, at least to me.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 11:13 AM   #113 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
As Christ pointed out, the MAP sensor will not sense it. I removed this part from my post.

EGR works as long as the pressure in the exhaust manifold is higher than the pressure inside the intake manifold. It is possible to have significant EGR levels at WOT and even at positive intake manifold pressure. In fact, diesel engines always operate EGR with positive intake pressure.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 12:47 PM   #114 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
As Christ pointed out, the MAP sensor will not sense it. I removed this part from my post.

EGR works as long as the pressure in the exhaust manifold is higher than the pressure inside the intake manifold. It is possible to have significant EGR levels at WOT and even at positive intake manifold pressure. In fact, diesel engines always operate EGR with positive intake pressure.
Without sounding pompous about it - doesn't an engine, by design, always have higher pressure in the exhaust than in the intake?

Barring a few very special situations, I can't think of a time that for it to be running properly, it doesn't have more pressure coming out than going in.

I don't fully understand EGR, so that's not a rhetorical question, and I don't mean it to come off that way.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 01:37 PM   #115 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
I just wanted to express my view as to whether EGR is drawn by vacuum or forced by pressure. My comment was merely academic as we were talking about the same net effect anyway.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 05:17 PM   #116 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
As Christ pointed out, the MAP sensor will not sense it. I removed this part from my post.

EGR works as long as the pressure in the exhaust manifold is higher than the pressure inside the intake manifold. It is possible to have significant EGR levels at WOT and even at positive intake manifold pressure. In fact, diesel engines always operate EGR with positive intake pressure.
I'm not understanding why this is. I'm cruising along at part throttle, so I have vacuum in the intake manifold. Then, I open up the EGR valve a bit. This is going to reduce the vacuum. The MAP sensor should see that.

At full throttle I could definitely imagine seeing positive pressure in the manifold, but I don't see that happening any other time than that. I guess I was also under the assumption that exhaust pressure was always higher than intake pressure as well.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 06:18 PM   #117 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
Won't your MAP think more air just went in and the ECU would adjust the fueling accordingly? Your o2 sensor would pick it up though, setting the record straight trimming the fuel, but maybe that would throw a MAP fault code.

Here's an interesting article on EGR control strategies.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 10:52 PM   #118 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
I'm not understanding why this is. I'm cruising along at part throttle, so I have vacuum in the intake manifold. Then, I open up the EGR valve a bit. This is going to reduce the vacuum. The MAP sensor should see that.

At full throttle I could definitely imagine seeing positive pressure in the manifold, but I don't see that happening any other time than that. I guess I was also under the assumption that exhaust pressure was always higher than intake pressure as well.
It's a thought... I'm not totally sure about it.

I don't really think that adding EGR is going to reduce the vacuum, because it's just adding mass from an area other than the throttle body. In other words, the engine is still drawing the same vacuum on the manifold, but the EGR is basically a second intake source. While you would show less flow through the throttle body, the vacuum figure should be the same regardless of EGR flow. (Some fluctuation might be noted due to expansion of heated gasses, etc.. )
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2010, 10:07 AM   #119 (permalink)
Too many cars
 
Gasoline Fumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,610

CRXFi - '88 Honda CRX XFi

Insight 256 - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights

Insight 5342 (no IMA) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 66.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,360
Thanked 810 Times in 481 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
It's a thought... I'm not totally sure about it.

I don't really think that adding EGR is going to reduce the vacuum, because it's just adding mass from an area other than the throttle body. In other words, the engine is still drawing the same vacuum on the manifold, but the EGR is basically a second intake source. While you would show less flow through the throttle body, the vacuum figure should be the same regardless of EGR flow. (Some fluctuation might be noted due to expansion of heated gasses, etc.. )
I'd expect a reduction in vacuum with EGR. Since EGR reduces power, you'll have to open the throttle further to maintain the same speed. And the EGR flow you're letting into the intake manifold is higher pressure than the ambient pressure entering the throttle body, so that alone should decrease vacuum even if throttle position remains the same.

Also, the ECU in Suzukis (as well as other cars) uses the MAP sensor to monitor EGR function. If the ECU doesn't see the expected change in MAP when the EGR valve is told to open, you get a CEL. But from what I've read, it's a very small change in vacuum. But if you're increasing EGR flow, that could change.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2010, 06:16 PM   #120 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Well, another option might be feeding the exhaust into the intake tract, upstream of the throttle.

Though that might mess things up because of the intake air temp (IAT) sensor ...

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My New 4cyl Compact Doesn't Get Good Mileage Stone Axe Introductions 13 02-08-2013 01:06 PM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 55 08-21-2012 12:34 AM
Trouble Code PO401 EGR Flow Insufficient Detected Ford Man Off-Topic Tech 4 12-09-2011 01:45 PM
How to get instant fuel consumption from Megasquirt TELVM Instrumentation 11 08-29-2011 03:47 PM
The Mechanism Behind Flow Separation LostCause Aerodynamics 46 07-15-2010 08:38 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com