Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2011, 08:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 13

Van - '00 Chevy Astro 2WD Passenger
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Which intake would show most fuel efficiency gains?

I've been searching and searching the internet for an answer, and I haven't been able to find a clear one, so I've turned to EcoModder. Which intake system, Cold Air Intake, stock intake, or a short ram intake? I've already learned that cold air means more powerful explosions, because of the cold dense air, but would this mean, under frugal driving, that one would see fuel gains while maintaining the same (if not better) acceleration? Any information would be greatly appreciated!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-23-2011, 09:49 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Search feature, live and be well.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 10:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
lots of unknowns need to be answered in your search for the perfect intake, like besides an air filter, what else is attached to your intake system...
is it a straight shot to the filter or is there a resonator in the factory system?
is there any ecu related electronics mounted in the intact tract between the throttle body and air filter?
what kind of car/truck is this?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 11:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 13

Van - '00 Chevy Astro 2WD Passenger
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Its gonna be for a Honda Civic Hatchback that I haven't bought yet so I'm assuming everything will be like factory settings.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 01:17 AM   #5 (permalink)
Smooth Operator
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: dover tn
Posts: 147

Old Yellar - '79 MGB Tourer Drop-Hood Coupé
Sports Cars
90 day: 25.83 mpg (US)

Old Brown Ford - '91 Ford Bronco Custom

MAGNUM - '05 DODGE MAGNUM SXT
Thanks: 9
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Cold Air Intake,,,, CAI Thought to provider a denser colder charge enhancing engine efficiency.improves available power .

Warm Air Induction.... WAI thought to improve fuel economy because of *pumping losses* ...reduces available power

stock intake, .. best of both worlds it will have a sensor that will provide WAI on start until proper operating temps are met then automatically adjust CAI & WAI as required

short ram intake? velocity stacks do you mean?? in carburetor units increases the induction speed for enhanced mixture atomization usually in racing conditions with no air filter
Ram Air Cold Induction ...RACI a cold air induction system with the induction in a high pressure area exposed to the air stream ,, the poor mans supercharger ,, increases the induction pressure by about .02 PSI @ 70 MPG , same as CAI with a wee bit [negligible] of boost.


my unit is a 1800CC if i had what i want it would be a K03 turbocharger
but until engineering development i settle for RACI, development and parts cost prohibitive . i need to do trials with the RACI and a manometer and see if the theoretical .02 PSI is seen in the airbox..

i would like the WAI crowd to provide hard data to support claims

CAI seems to be the big market choice they are every where with vendors claiming effect.


if i were you id hang with the stock system for a while until convincing hard data is presented
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 01:36 AM   #6 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyRun View Post
Its gonna be for a Honda Civic Hatchback that I haven't bought yet so I'm assuming everything will be like factory settings.
ok, you're not helping.. WAY not enough info.

Year?
Engine size?
Transmission?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 01:43 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
really.


If you would do a search (why should we do it) of the forum, using the search function, you would see documented and tested results.

all that cold air crap is well crap. Cold air does not improve FE. Oh, and I can say that because I have used the search function to find the answers.

There is plenty of test results for the warm air. again search.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 02:46 AM   #8 (permalink)
Smooth Operator
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: dover tn
Posts: 147

Old Yellar - '79 MGB Tourer Drop-Hood Coupé
Sports Cars
90 day: 25.83 mpg (US)

Old Brown Ford - '91 Ford Bronco Custom

MAGNUM - '05 DODGE MAGNUM SXT
Thanks: 9
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
searched... all i found was one proved no effect
wiki has no documented test results
show me

http://ecomodder.com/wiki/index.php/Warm_air_intake

no documented results

http://www.metrompg.com/posts/wai-test.htm



Observations & conclusions

The grain of salt: the margin of error for the CAI group is +/-0.17 km/gal; for the WAI group it's +/-0.42 km/gal.

For this car, under these specific test conditions, the difference between the WAI and CAI averages is so small as to be statistically insignificant. (And even if it was statistically significant, practically speaking there's no difference between 79.12 and 79.31 km/gal

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ins-16212.html

Run with Cold:

1. 38.5
2. 36.5
3. 36.4
4. 37.1
5. 35.6
6. 36.0

Average: 36.68

Run with Hot:

1. 37.0
2. 36.8
3. 37.0
4. 34.8
5. 36.4
6. 35.1

Average: 36.18



A .5 mpg decrease overall at 45 mph. While this would be acceptable if there was another benefit, there isn't. The power is NOTICEABLY gone from the engine. With the hot air intake, its choked.
................


i guess i was wrong heres 2 tests not carried over to the wiki both say WAI ineffective

Last edited by MGB=MPG; 02-24-2011 at 03:10 AM.. Reason: add reference
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 11:32 AM   #9 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
If there's no documented increase to a CAI, why spend the money? If you don't have one already, spend the money on a Scangauge. It will do FAR more for your mileage.

I'm doing just fine with my Civic and the stock intake.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
mcrews (04-20-2011), SoobieOut (02-24-2011)
Old 02-24-2011, 11:36 AM   #10 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
If there's no documented increase to a CAI, why spend the money? If you don't have one already, spend the money on a Scangauge. It will do FAR more for your mileage.

I'm doing just fine with my Civic and the stock intake.
Best advice yet, bottom line.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com